YLDE ranks 1st and EGGQ 31st of 50 funds in the Active Option Income Category.
EGGQ vs YLDE
YLDE −0.45pt a year
0.93%0.48%
YLDE 2.6×the volume
5.05K13.3K
EGGQ vs YLDE Performance
−14.3%+16.5%
- EGGQ 0.93%
- YLDE 0.48%, better
- EGGQ $60M
- YLDE $177M
- EGGQ −14.3%
- YLDE +16.5%, better
- EGGQ 11.32%, better
- YLDE 7.27%
- EGGQ 39
- YLDE 50
- EGGQ 5.05K sh
- YLDE 13.3K sh, better
- EGGQ $35.69
- YLDE $56.30
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EGGQ | YLDE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B55 | A86Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | F17 | A71Higher |
| Tradability | C44 | A80Higher |
| Holdings | D29 | A82Higher |
| Durability | B57 | A90Higher |
Rank among Active Option Income funds
Same Category. EGGQ and YLDE are both graded against the same 50 Active Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EGGQC
YLDEA
In short
EGGQ Most options-income funds lead with yield. EGGQ flips the order: growth first, income second, with an active manager buying US large caps directly or through options, and paying monthly. Fee: 0.93% net of a waiver through March 30, 2027.
YLDE A 2017 ClearBridge dividend portfolio that had an income engine bolted on in 2025: about 50 large-cap dividend payers, with index calls sold on top for premium. Pays monthly, charges 0.48%, no waiver, below the category median.
Stated mandate
EGGQ The Fund seeks long-term growth and, secondarily, current income. It actively selects U.S.-listed large-cap companies, investing directly or synthetically through options; its option strategies seek income and may limit upside, while cash or Treasuries may comprise up to 20% of assets.
YLDE The Fund seeks income and long-term capital appreciation through an actively managed enhanced equity-income strategy. It primarily invests in dividend-paying equities and writes U.S. exchange-traded calls on U.S. large-cap equity indices to enhance income.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EGGQ vs YLDE Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EGGQ vs YLDE Cost
Overpaying EGGQ vs YLDE
$7,934
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EGGQ 0.93%
$17,539
YLDE 0.48%
$9,605
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EGGQ | YLDE | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,644 | $865 | $779 |
| 20 | $6,199 | $3,328 | $2,871 |
| 30 | $17,539 | $9,605 | $7,934 |
- 0.93%EGGQ
- 0.48%YLDE, cheaper
- Middle half of Active Option Income funds
- Median 0.95%
YLDE 8th cheapest of 50 funds
EGGQ 22nd cheapest of 50 funds
EGGQ vs YLDE Dividends
- EGGQ 11.32%, better
- YLDE 7.27%
- EGGQ $4.26
- YLDE $4.17
- EGGQ $0.40
- YLDE $0.30
- EGGQ Oct 29, 2026
- YLDE Nov 2, 2026
- EGGQ Oct 30, 2026
- YLDE Nov 5, 2026
- EGGQ Monthly
- YLDE Monthly
Distribution history
EGGQ vs YLDE Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EGGQ 37.9%YLDE 10.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- EGGQ 0.41YLDE 1.24
- Worst fall
- EGGQ −46.6%YLDE −20.2%
- Market sensitivity
- EGGQ 2.09YLDE 0.60
EGGQ and YLDE in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.93% · 0.34%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.48% · 0.34%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.93% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.48% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.93% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.48% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

