Skip to content

EIPX vs TMED

FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF

EIPXCNYSE Arca

T. Rowe Price Health Care ETF

TMEDBNasdaq

Overlap

Expense ratio

TMED −0.51pt a year

EIPX0.95%TMED0.44%

Avg volume · 30D

EIPX 4.6×the volume

EIPX34.1KTMED7.43K

EIPX vs TMED Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+35.4%EIPX+20.6%TMED

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. EIPX +35.4%. TMED +20.6%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%10%30%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
EIPX 0.95%
TMED 0.44%, better
Fund size
EIPX $615M
TMED $34M
1Y total return
EIPX +35.4%, better
TMED +20.6%
Yield (12M)
EIPX 2.63%
TMED No data
Holdings
EIPX 91
TMED 112
Avg volume (30D)
EIPX 34.1K sh, better
TMED 7.43K sh
NAV per share
EIPX $34.25
TMED $34.31
52W range

ETF.net Grade

EIPX: Cost 15, Risk 90, Mission 40, Tradability 60, Holdings 71, Durability 78. TMED: Cost 82, Risk 55, Mission not scored, Tradability 59, Holdings 91, Durability 35.
Pillar letters and Scores for EIPX, TMED, with each pillar’s weight
PillarEIPXTMED
Cost30% weightF15A82Higher
Mission25% weightC40Not scored
Risk15% weightA90HigherB55
Tradability15% weightB60HigherB59
Holdings10% weightA71A91Higher
Durability5% weightA78HigherD35

Rank among US Active Sector funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. EIPX and TMED are both graded against the same 35 US Active Sector funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Sector⁠

Category · 35 funds
See all 35 ›

TMED ranks 2nd and EIPX 15th of 35 funds in the US Active Sector Category.

  1. Rank 1AAVREAvantis Real Estate ETFScore 77
  2. Rank 2APSRInvesco Active U.S. Real Estate ETFScore 70
  3. Rank 2BTMEDT. Rowe Price Health Care ETFScore 70
  4. Rank 4ATRUTVanEck Technology TruSector ETFScore 69
  5. Rank 14CEIPIFT Energy Income Partners Enhanced Income ETFScore 51
  6. Rank 15CEIPXFT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETFScore 50
  7. Rank 16CJTEKJPMorgan U.S. Tech Leaders ETFScore 49

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

EIPXCFT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF

TMEDBT. Rowe Price Health Care ETF

In short

EIPX First Trust hands the wheel to Energy Income Partners: an actively run, global energy book of roughly 80 names chasing risk-adjusted total return, not an index snapshot of whoever pumps the most barrels.

TMED No data

Stated mandate

EIPX The Fund seeks risk-adjusted total return.

TMED No data

Why people hold it

  • EIPX Actively managed rather than index-tracking, with a stated goal of risk-adjusted total return. A manager picks the energy names, and can pass on the ones it doesn't like.
  • Roughly 80 holdings. Concentrated enough that the manager's calls actually show up, broad enough that no single pipeline or utility runs the show.
  • The mandate is global, so the portfolio isn't fenced into US energy names the way many sector funds are.
  • Pays on a quarterly cadence and has built a mid-sized asset base since its 2022 launch, which is real staying power for a niche sector fund.

TMED No data

Worth knowing

  • EIPX 0.95% a year is specialist-active pricing, meaningfully above the typical active US equity ETF. You're paying for the stock picking, so it has to earn its keep.
  • It trades lightly compared with its peer group, so entry and exit costs deserve more attention than with a mega-cap fund.
  • This is one sector, start to finish. Energy moves on commodity cycles and policy, and the whole portfolio rides that wave together.

TMED No data

Full EIPX profile⁠

Full TMED profile⁠

EIPX vs TMED Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

EIPX vs TMED Cost

Overpaying EIPX vs TMED

$9,017

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • EIPX 0.95%

    $17,869

  • TMED 0.44%

    $8,852

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • EIPX 0.95%
  • TMED 0.44%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530EIPX $17,869TMED $8,852

Year by year

YearEIPXTMEDOverpaying
10$1,678$794$884
20$6,322$3,061$3,261
30$17,869$8,852$9,017

Expense ratio

  • 0.95%EIPX
  • 0.44%TMED, cheaper
  • Middle half of US Active Sector funds
  • Median 0.61%

TMED 7th cheapest of 35 funds

EIPX 30th cheapest of 35 funds

EIPX vs TMED Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
EIPX 2.63%
TMED No data
Payout (12M)
EIPX $0.90
TMED No data
Last payment
EIPX $0.25
TMED $0.16
Ex-dividend
EIPX Sep 24, 2026
TMED Dec 23, 2025
Paid on
EIPX Sep 30, 2026
TMED Dec 26, 2025
Frequency
EIPX Quarterly
TMED Irregular

Distribution history

Per share, 2022 to 2026, same scale for both

EIPXQuarterly · 16 paymentsAll EIPX payments⁠
One bar per payment. 16 payments from 2022 to 2026 YTD. Dec 23, 2022 $0.07; Mar 24, 2023 $0.17; Jun 27, 2023 $0.19; Sep 22, 2023 $0.20; Dec 22, 2023 $0.18; Mar 21, 2024 $0.17; Jun 27, 2024 $0.22; Sep 26, 2024 $0.23; Dec 13, 2024 $0.19; Mar 27, 2025 $0.20; Jun 26, 2025 $0.23; Sep 25, 2025 $0.22; Dec 12, 2025 $0.20; Mar 26, 2026 $0.21; Jun 25, 2026 $0.24; Sep 24, 2026 $0.25. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.2520232026YTD
TMEDIrregular · 1 paymentAll TMED payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2022 to 2026 YTD. Dec 23, 2025 $0.16. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.2520232026YTD

EIPX vs TMED Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
EIPX 14.2%TMED 14.7%since Jul 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
EIPX 1.16TMED 1.50since Jul 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
EIPX −15.4%since Nov 2022TMED −11.1%since Jun 2025
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
EIPX 0.24TMED 0.46

Popular comparisons

  • EIPXCvsAVREA

    FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF · Avantis Real Estate ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.95% · 0.17%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TMEDBvsAVREA

    T. Rowe Price Health Care ETF · Avantis Real Estate ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.44% · 0.17%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • EIPXCvsPSRA

    FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF · Invesco Active U.S. Real Estate ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.95% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TMEDBvsPSRA

    T. Rowe Price Health Care ETF · Invesco Active U.S. Real Estate ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.44% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • EIPXCvsTRUTA

    FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF · VanEck Technology TruSector ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.95% · 0.14%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TMEDBvsTRUTA

    T. Rowe Price Health Care ETF · VanEck Technology TruSector ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.44% · 0.14%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.