Skip to content

EIPX vs TRUT

FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF

EIPXCNYSE Arca

VanEck Technology TruSector ETF

TRUTANasdaq

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

TRUT −0.81pt a year

EIPX0.95%TRUT0.14%

Avg volume · 30D

TRUT 5.3×the volume

EIPX34.1KTRUT182K

EIPX vs TRUT Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+35.4%EIPX+12.7%TRUT

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. EIPX +35.4%. TRUT +12.7%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%−10%0%20%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
EIPX 0.95%
TRUT 0.14%, better
Fund size
EIPX $615M
TRUT $238M
1Y total return
EIPX +35.4%, better
TRUT +12.7%
Yield (12M)
EIPX 2.63%, better
TRUT 0.35%
Holdings
EIPX 91
TRUT 77
Avg volume (30D)
EIPX 34.1K sh
TRUT 182K sh, better
NAV per share
EIPX $34.25
TRUT $31.15
52W range

ETF.net Grade

EIPX: Cost 15, Risk 90, Mission 40, Tradability 60, Holdings 71, Durability 78. TRUT: Cost 93, Risk 23, Mission not scored, Tradability 96, Holdings 31, Durability 61.
Pillar letters and Scores for EIPX, TRUT, with each pillar’s weight
PillarEIPXTRUT
Cost30% weightF15A93Higher
Mission25% weightC40Not scored
Risk15% weightA90HigherF23
Tradability15% weightB60A96Higher
Holdings10% weightA71HigherD31
Durability5% weightA78HigherB61

Rank among US Active Sector funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. EIPX and TRUT are both graded against the same 35 US Active Sector funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Sector⁠

Category · 35 funds
See all 35 ›

TRUT ranks 4th and EIPX 15th of 35 funds in the US Active Sector Category.

  1. Rank 1AAVREAvantis Real Estate ETFScore 77
  2. Rank 2APSRInvesco Active U.S. Real Estate ETFScore 70
  3. Rank 2BTMEDT. Rowe Price Health Care ETFScore 70
  4. Rank 4ATRUTVanEck Technology TruSector ETFScore 69
  5. Rank 5BUTESVirtus Reaves Utilities ETFScore 66
  6. Rank 14CEIPIFT Energy Income Partners Enhanced Income ETFScore 51
  7. Rank 15CEIPXFT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETFScore 50
  8. Rank 16CJTEKJPMorgan U.S. Tech Leaders ETFScore 49

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

EIPXCFT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF

TRUTAVanEck Technology TruSector ETF

In short

EIPX First Trust hands the wheel to Energy Income Partners: an actively run, global energy book of roughly 80 names chasing risk-adjusted total return, not an index snapshot of whoever pumps the most barrels.

TRUT Diversification rules force most tech ETFs to trim their biggest names. TRUT's answer: own the giants directly up to the legal line, then top up with sector ETFs so the portfolio mirrors the sector's real shape.

Stated mandate

EIPX The Fund seeks risk-adjusted total return.

TRUT The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation through active investment in securities of information technology-related companies or instruments providing exposure to them.

Why people hold it

  • EIPX Actively managed rather than index-tracking, with a stated goal of risk-adjusted total return. A manager picks the energy names, and can pass on the ones it doesn't like.
  • Roughly 80 holdings. Concentrated enough that the manager's calls actually show up, broad enough that no single pipeline or utility runs the show.
  • The mandate is global, so the portfolio isn't fenced into US energy names the way many sector funds are.
  • Pays on a quarterly cadence and has built a mid-sized asset base since its 2022 launch, which is real staying power for a niche sector fund.
  • TRUT The mechanism is the point. Fund rules cap one stock at 25% and stocks above 5% at 50% combined; TRUT fills the gap with targeted sector ETFs instead of overweighting smaller names.vaneck.comvaneck.com 2
  • 0.14% a year for an actively managed fund, against a median near 0.65% across active US equity peers. Cheap enough to sit alongside index products.
  • One of the two originals in VanEck's TruSector line, launched in 2025. The approach has since been extended across all 11 GICS sectors.vaneck.comvaneck.com 2
  • About 80 positions, quarterly distributions, and steady day-to-day trading. On cost and tradability it lands in the upper tier of its active US equity cohort.

Worth knowing

  • EIPX 0.95% a year is specialist-active pricing, meaningfully above the typical active US equity ETF. You're paying for the stock picking, so it has to earn its keep.
  • It trades lightly compared with its peer group, so entry and exit costs deserve more attention than with a mega-cap fund.
  • This is one sector, start to finish. Energy moves on commodity cycles and policy, and the whole portfolio rides that wave together.
  • TRUT Part of the exposure arrives through other ETFs rather than shares the fund holds outright. That is the workaround that makes uncapped weights possible, and it adds a layer.vaneck.com
  • Uncapped means concentrated. Leaning fully into tech's largest companies ties results to a handful of mega-caps more tightly than a capped sector fund would.vaneck.com
  • Launched August 2025, so there is only a short record of how closely the hybrid build actually shadows an uncapped tech benchmark.

Full EIPX profile⁠

Full TRUT profile⁠

EIPX vs TRUT Holdings

How EIPX and TRUT differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.2% of EIPX and 0.0% of TRUT.

Level by level

  • Holdings1 in both0.0%
  • Countryby domicile92.2%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

No Sector split for TRUT.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in EIPX and TRUT, widest gap first
CountryMore in EIPXMore in TRUT
United StatesTRUT +7.4 points
CanadaEIPX +3.2 points
United KingdomEIPX +2.1 points
FranceEIPX +1.9 points
Other countries (4)EIPX +0.2 points

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • EIPX41.6%
  • TRUT86.5%

Securities held

  • EIPX89
  • TRUT76

Asset class

EIPX
Equity
TRUT
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in EIPX88
  • In both1
  • Only in TRUT75

Only in EIPX

88 securities, 91.8% of EIPX by weight

  • Enterprise Products Partners L.P.7.43%
  • Energy Transfer LP6.85%
  • Mplx Lp3.78%

Only in TRUT

75 securities, 99.9% of TRUT by weight

  • Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund30.70%
  • Nvidia Corp15.65%
  • Apple Inc15.40%

Weight gaps

All 1 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in EIPX and TRUT, widest gap first
HoldingMore in EIPXMore in TRUT
First Solar, Inc.FSLREIPX +0.13 points

All 89 EIPX holdings⁠All 75 TRUT holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

EIPX vs TRUT Cost

Overpaying EIPX vs TRUT

$14,937

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • EIPX 0.95%

    $17,869

  • TRUT 0.14%

    $2,932

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • EIPX 0.95%
  • TRUT 0.14%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530EIPX $17,869TRUT $2,932

Year by year

YearEIPXTRUTOverpaying
10$1,678$256$1,422
20$6,322$1,000$5,322
30$17,869$2,932$14,937

Expense ratio

  • 0.95%EIPX
  • 0.14%TRUT, cheaper
  • Middle half of US Active Sector funds
  • Median 0.61%

TRUT 3rd cheapest of 35 funds

EIPX 30th cheapest of 35 funds

EIPX vs TRUT Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
EIPX 2.63%, better
TRUT 0.35%
Payout (12M)
EIPX $0.90
TRUT $0.11
Last payment
EIPX $0.25
TRUT $0.03
Ex-dividend
EIPX Sep 24, 2026
TRUT Oct 1, 2026
Paid on
EIPX Sep 30, 2026
TRUT Oct 6, 2026
Frequency
EIPX Quarterly
TRUT Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2022 to 2026, same scale for both

EIPXQuarterly · 16 paymentsAll EIPX payments⁠
One bar per payment. 16 payments from 2022 to 2026 YTD. Dec 23, 2022 $0.07; Mar 24, 2023 $0.17; Jun 27, 2023 $0.19; Sep 22, 2023 $0.20; Dec 22, 2023 $0.18; Mar 21, 2024 $0.17; Jun 27, 2024 $0.22; Sep 26, 2024 $0.23; Dec 13, 2024 $0.19; Mar 27, 2025 $0.20; Jun 26, 2025 $0.23; Sep 25, 2025 $0.22; Dec 12, 2025 $0.20; Mar 26, 2026 $0.21; Jun 25, 2026 $0.24; Sep 24, 2026 $0.25. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.2520232026YTD
TRUTQuarterly · 5 paymentsAll TRUT payments⁠
One bar per payment. 5 payments from 2022 to 2026 YTD. Oct 1, 2025 $0.01; Dec 29, 2025 $0.02; Apr 1, 2026 $0.03; Jul 1, 2026 $0.03; Oct 1, 2026 $0.03. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.2520232026YTD

EIPX vs TRUT Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
EIPX 14.2%TRUT 26.8%since Sep 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
EIPX 1.16TRUT 0.78since Sep 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
EIPX −15.4%since Nov 2022TRUT −18.6%since Aug 2025
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
EIPX 0.24TRUT 1.76

Popular comparisons

  • EIPXCvsAVREA

    FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF · Avantis Real Estate ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.95% · 0.17%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TRUTAvsAVREA

    VanEck Technology TruSector ETF · Avantis Real Estate ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.14% · 0.17%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • EIPXCvsPSRA

    FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF · Invesco Active U.S. Real Estate ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.95% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TRUTAvsPSRA

    VanEck Technology TruSector ETF · Invesco Active U.S. Real Estate ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.14% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • EIPXCvsTMEDB

    FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF · T. Rowe Price Health Care ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.95% · 0.44%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TRUTAvsTMEDB

    VanEck Technology TruSector ETF · T. Rowe Price Health Care ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.14% · 0.44%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.