Skip to content

EMC vs MILN

Global X Emerging Markets Great Consumer ETF

EMCCNYSE Arca

Global X Millennial Consumer ETF

MILNBNasdaq

Overlap

0.1%by weight

Expense ratio

MILN −0.15pt a year

EMC0.65%MILN0.50%

Avg volume · 30D

MILN 1.7×the volume

EMC4.19KMILN7.31K

3Y return · a year

MILN +0.7pt

EMC+14.1%MILN+14.8%

EMC vs MILN Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+7.5%EMC−7.2%MILN

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. EMC +7.5%. MILN −7.2%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%20%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
EMC 0.65%
MILN 0.50%, better
Fund size
EMC $52M
MILN $89M
1Y total return
EMC +7.5%, better
MILN −7.2%
Yield (12M)
EMC 0.63%, better
MILN 0.32%
Holdings
EMC 73
MILN 82
Avg volume (30D)
EMC 4.19K sh
MILN 7.31K sh, better
NAV per share
EMC $33.86
MILN $43.75
52W range

ETF.net Grade

EMC: Cost 31, Risk 52, Mission not scored, Tradability 45, Holdings 42, Durability 77. MILN: Cost 70, Risk 44, Mission 80, Tradability 75, Holdings 83, Durability 81.
Pillar letters and Scores for EMC, MILN, with each pillar’s weight
PillarEMCMILN
Cost30% weightD31A70Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredA80
Risk15% weightC52HigherC44
Tradability15% weightC45A75Higher
Holdings10% weightC42A83Higher
Durability5% weightA77A81Higher

Rank among Consumer Lifestyle funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. EMC and MILN are both graded against the same 10 Consumer Lifestyle funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Consumer Lifestyle⁠

Category · 10 funds
See all 10 ›

MILN ranks 1st and EMC 5th of 10 funds in the Consumer Lifestyle Category.

  1. Rank 1BMILNGlobal X Millennial Consumer ETFScore 68
  2. Rank 2BPEJInvesco Dynamic Leisure and Entertainment ETFScore 63
  3. Rank 4CGENZVanEck Digital Native Economy ETFScore 44
  4. Rank 5CEMCGlobal X Emerging Markets Great Consumer ETFScore 42
  5. Rank 6CLOGOAlpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETFScore 41

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

EMCCGlobal X Emerging Markets Great Consumer ETF

MILNBGlobal X Millennial Consumer ETF

In short

EMC Most consumer-theme ETFs just follow an index. EMC hires stock pickers: a Mirae Asset team in Hong Kong choosing roughly 70 emerging-market companies tied to a rising middle class, in whatever sector that spending lands.

MILN A bet on how a whole generation spends, not on one sector. Since 2016 it has tracked an index of about 80 US companies built around Millennial wallets, an early take on generational themes that costs less than the typical fund in its niche.

Stated mandate

EMC The fund seeks long-term capital growth by investing in companies linked to emerging-market consumption trends driven by the expanding purchasing power of the middle class.

MILN The fund seeks exposure to companies positioned to benefit from the increasing spending power and distinct consumption preferences of U.S. Millennials.

Why people hold it

  • EMC Actively managed and sub-advised by Mirae Asset's Hong Kong team, which hand-picks emerging-market names it judges best placed to capture domestic spending growth.globalxetfs.com
  • Not fenced into consumer staples and discretionary: managers can own any industry sitting in the path of rising consumption, from banks to airlines.globalxetfs.com
  • Born in 2010 as a Mirae Asset mutual fund, converted to an ETF in 2023 with the same team and process, plus daily holdings disclosure and intraday trading.globalxetfs.comsec.gov
  • Active stock picking at 0.65%, the median expense ratio in its consumer-theme peer group, where most rivals simply track a basket.
  • MILN Charges 0.50% a year, under the 0.65% median for its consumer-lifestyle peer group. Modest for a single-theme fund.globalxetfs.com
  • Follows a published rulebook, the Indxx Millennials Thematic Index, so holdings answer to the stated mandate rather than a manager's mood.globalxetfs.com
  • The portfolio matches what the label promises: US companies tied to Millennial spending power and tastes, spread across roughly 80 names instead of a two-stock wager.globalxetfs.com
  • Top-quartile standing in a consumer-lifestyle cohort that includes PAWZ, EMC and LOGO, and it undercuts EMC and LOGO on fees.

Worth knowing

  • EMC Thinly traded, so spreads can run wider than in the category's heavyweights.
  • No index to hug: the MSCI Emerging Markets Index is the yardstick, not the blueprint, so results ride on the team's calls.globalxetfs.com
  • Index-based cousins in the cohort cost less, with MILN and PAWZ at 0.50%.
  • MILN Trades thinly. Spreads can run wider than on a mega-cap index fund, so order size and limit prices matter more here.
  • One theme, one country. Roughly 80 US consumer stocks tied to a single spending story can move further, up or down, than a broad market fund.
  • Distributions arrive once or twice a year at most. Income is not what this structure is built around.

Full EMC profile⁠

Full MILN profile⁠

EMC vs MILN Holdings

As of

How EMC and MILN differ

Overlap by weight

0.1%

Shared holdings make up 1.4% of EMC and 0.1% of MILN.

Level by level

  • Holdings1 in both0.1%
  • Countryby domicile0.7%
  • Sector10 Sectors39.7%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

Sector weights in EMC and MILN, widest gap first
SectorMore in EMCMore in MILN
Consumer DiscretionaryMILN +43.0 points
TechnologyEMC +29.7 points
FinancialsEMC +19.5 points
CommunicationMILN +8.9 points
IndustrialsEMC +4.8 points
Consumer StaplesMILN +4.4 points
Real EstateMILN +3.9 points
MaterialsEMC +3.0 points
EnergyEMC +2.6 points
Health CareEMC +0.7 points

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in EMC and MILN, widest gap first
CountryMore in EMCMore in MILN
United StatesMILN +96.7 points
TaiwanEMC +29.9 points
South KoreaEMC +21.0 points
ChinaEMC +16.0 points
IndiaEMC +13.1 points
BrazilEMC +5.2 points
Hong KongEMC +3.5 points
South AfricaEMC +3.1 points
Other countries (7)EMC +4.8 points

Outside the US: EMC 7% developed, 93% emerging.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • EMC46.0%
  • MILN34.1%

Securities held

  • EMC69
  • MILN81

Asset class

EMC
Equity
MILN
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in EMC68
  • In both1
  • Only in MILN80

Only in EMC

68 securities, 98.5% of EMC by weight

  • Taiwan Semiconductor Manufac13.76%
  • Samsung Electr-Gdr Reg’s7.08%
  • Mediatek Inc4.30%

Only in MILN

80 securities, 99.9% of MILN by weight

  • Apple Inc3.85%
  • Airbnb Inc-Class A3.72%
  • Doordash Inc - A3.70%

Weight gaps

All 1 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in EMC and MILN, widest gap first
HoldingMore in EMCMore in MILN
Other Payable & ReceivablesEMC +0.05 points

All 68 EMC holdings⁠All 80 MILN holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

EMC vs MILN Cost

Overpaying EMC vs MILN

$2,738

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • EMC 0.65%

    $12,717

  • MILN 0.50%

    $9,979

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • EMC 0.65%
  • MILN 0.50%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530EMC $12,717MILN $9,979

Year by year

YearEMCMILNOverpaying
10$1,163$900$263
20$4,440$3,460$980
30$12,717$9,979$2,738

Expense ratio

  • 0.65%EMC
  • 0.50%MILN, cheaper
  • Middle half of Consumer Lifestyle funds
  • Median 0.54%

MILN 3rd cheapest of 10 funds

EMC 7th cheapest of 10 funds

EMC vs MILN Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
EMC 0.63%, better
MILN 0.32%
Payout (12M)
EMC $0.21
MILN $0.14
Last payment
EMC $0.08
MILN $0.04
Ex-dividend
EMC Jun 29, 2026
MILN Jun 29, 2026
Paid on
EMC Jul 7, 2026
MILN Jul 2, 2026
Frequency
EMC Twice a year
MILN Twice a year

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

EMCTwice a year · 6 paymentsAll EMC payments⁠
One bar per payment. 6 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 28, 2023 $0.23; Jun 27, 2024 $0.12; Dec 30, 2024 $0.18; Jun 27, 2025 $0.11; Dec 30, 2025 $0.13; Jun 29, 2026 $0.08. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252017202020232026YTD
MILNTwice a year · 15 paymentsAll MILN payments⁠
One bar per payment. 15 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 28, 2017 $0.17; Dec 28, 2018 $0.09; Jun 27, 2019 $0.02; Dec 30, 2019 $0.09; Jun 29, 2020 $0.02; Dec 30, 2020 $0.06; Dec 30, 2021 $0.07; Dec 29, 2022 $0.06; Jun 29, 2023 $0.0042; Dec 28, 2023 $0.11; Jun 27, 2024 $0.02; Dec 30, 2024 $0.09; Jun 27, 2025 $0.02; Dec 30, 2025 $0.10; Jun 29, 2026 $0.04. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252017202020232026YTD

EMC vs MILN Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
EMC 16.1%, betterMILN 17.7%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
EMC 0.62MILN 0.62Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
EMC −18.4%since May 2023MILN −44.4%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
EMC 1.04MILN 1.15

Popular comparisons

  • EMCCvsPEJB

    Global X Emerging Markets Great Consumer ETF · Invesco Dynamic Leisure and Entertainment ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.58%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • MILNBvsPEJB

    Global X Millennial Consumer ETF · Invesco Dynamic Leisure and Entertainment ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.58%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • EMCCvsPAWZC

    Global X Emerging Markets Great Consumer ETF · ProShares Pet Care ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • MILNBvsPAWZC

    Global X Millennial Consumer ETF · ProShares Pet Care ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • EMCCvsGENZC

    Global X Emerging Markets Great Consumer ETF · VanEck Digital Native Economy ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.51%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • MILNBvsGENZC

    Global X Millennial Consumer ETF · VanEck Digital Native Economy ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.51%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.