PEJ ranks 2nd and EMC 5th of 10 funds in the Consumer Lifestyle Category.
EMC vs PEJ
PEJ −0.07pt a year
0.65%0.58%
PEJ 14.6×the volume
4.19K61.3K
PEJ +9.4pt
+14.1%+23.5%
EMC vs PEJ Performance
+7.5%+14.2%
- EMC 0.65%
- PEJ 0.58%, better
- EMC $52M
- PEJ $358M
- EMC +7.5%
- PEJ +14.2%, better
- EMC 0.63%, better
- PEJ 0.51%
- EMC 73
- PEJ 32
- EMC 4.19K sh
- PEJ 61.3K sh, better
- EMC $33.86
- PEJ $66.44
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EMC | PEJ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D31 | C46Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C52 | B66Higher |
| Tradability | C45 | A86Higher |
| Holdings | C42 | B69Higher |
| Durability | A77 | A90Higher |
Rank among Consumer Lifestyle funds
Same Category. EMC and PEJ are both graded against the same 10 Consumer Lifestyle funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EMCC
PEJB
In short
EMC Most consumer-theme ETFs just follow an index. EMC hires stock pickers: a Mirae Asset team in Hong Kong choosing roughly 70 emerging-market companies tied to a rising middle class, in whatever sector that spending lands.
PEJ The travel-and-fun trade, run like a quant screen: roughly 30 US leisure and entertainment stocks re-ranked every quarter on momentum, quality, management action and value. Fee is 0.58%, with no waiver doing the work. Trading since 2005.
Stated mandate
EMC The fund seeks long-term capital growth by investing in companies linked to emerging-market consumption trends driven by the expanding purchasing power of the middle class.
PEJ The fund seeks capital appreciation through an index that evaluates companies using multiple investment-merit criteria.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EMC vs PEJ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EMC vs PEJ Cost
Overpaying EMC vs PEJ
$1,264
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EMC 0.65%
$12,717
PEJ 0.58%
$11,453
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EMC | PEJ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,163 | $1,041 | $122 |
| 20 | $4,440 | $3,986 | $454 |
| 30 | $12,717 | $11,453 | $1,264 |
- 0.65%EMC
- 0.58%PEJ, cheaper
- Middle half of Consumer Lifestyle funds
- Median 0.54%
PEJ 6th cheapest of 10 funds
EMC 7th cheapest of 10 funds
EMC vs PEJ Dividends
- EMC 0.63%, better
- PEJ 0.51%
- EMC $0.21
- PEJ $0.34
- EMC $0.08
- PEJ $0.06
- EMC Jun 29, 2026
- PEJ Sep 21, 2026
- EMC Jul 7, 2026
- PEJ Sep 25, 2026
- EMC Twice a year
- PEJ Quarterly
Distribution history
EMC vs PEJ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EMC 16.1%, betterPEJ 16.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- EMC 0.62PEJ 1.08, better
- Worst fall
- EMC −18.4%PEJ −34.7%
- Market sensitivity
- EMC 1.04PEJ 1.10
Popular comparisons
- 0.65% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.58% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.58% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.51%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.58% · 0.51%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.