Skip to content

EMC vs GENZ

Global X Emerging Markets Great Consumer ETF

EMCCNYSE Arca

VanEck Digital Native Economy ETF

GENZCNasdaq

Overlap

1.3%by weight

Expense ratio

GENZ −0.14pt a year

EMC0.65%GENZ0.51%

Avg volume · 30D

EMC 3.0×the volume

EMC4.19KGENZ1.38K

3Y return · a year

EMC +13.5pt

EMC+14.1%GENZ+0.6%

EMC vs GENZ Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+7.5%EMC−10.3%GENZ

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. EMC +7.5%. GENZ −10.3%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%20%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
EMC 0.65%
GENZ 0.51%, better
Fund size
EMC $52M
GENZ $15M
1Y total return
EMC +7.5%, better
GENZ −10.3%
Yield (12M)
EMC 0.63%
GENZ 3.83%, better
Holdings
EMC 73
GENZ 42
Avg volume (30D)
EMC 4.19K sh, better
GENZ 1.38K sh
NAV per share
EMC $33.86
GENZ $35.62
52W range

ETF.net Grade

EMC: Cost 31, Risk 52, Mission not scored, Tradability 45, Holdings 42, Durability 77. GENZ: Cost 55, Risk 26, Mission not scored, Tradability 39, Holdings 38, Durability 70.
Pillar letters and Scores for EMC, GENZ, with each pillar’s weight
PillarEMCGENZ
Cost30% weightD31B55Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightC52HigherD26
Tradability15% weightC45HigherD39
Holdings10% weightC42HigherD38
Durability5% weightA77HigherA70

Rank among Consumer Lifestyle funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. EMC and GENZ are both graded against the same 10 Consumer Lifestyle funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Consumer Lifestyle⁠

Category · 10 funds
See all 10 ›

GENZ ranks 4th and EMC 5th of 10 funds in the Consumer Lifestyle Category.

  1. Rank 1BMILNGlobal X Millennial Consumer ETFScore 68
  2. Rank 2BPEJInvesco Dynamic Leisure and Entertainment ETFScore 63
  3. Rank 3CPAWZProShares Pet Care ETFScore 53
  4. Rank 4CGENZVanEck Digital Native Economy ETFScore 44
  5. Rank 5CEMCGlobal X Emerging Markets Great Consumer ETFScore 42
  6. Rank 6CLOGOAlpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETFScore 41

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

EMCCGlobal X Emerging Markets Great Consumer ETF

GENZCVanEck Digital Native Economy ETF

In short

EMC Most consumer-theme ETFs just follow an index. EMC hires stock pickers: a Mirae Asset team in Hong Kong choosing roughly 70 emerging-market companies tied to a rising middle class, in whatever sector that spending lands.

GENZ Longevity is rare in thematics: GENZ dates back to 2008 and today tracks the MarketVector Digital Native Economy Index, roughly 40 US stocks, for 0.51% a year, below its peer group's median fee.

Stated mandate

EMC The fund seeks long-term capital growth by investing in companies linked to emerging-market consumption trends driven by the expanding purchasing power of the middle class.

GENZ GENZ seeks to replicate the MarketVector Digital Native Economy Index before fees and expenses. It uses a passive approach and normally invests at least 80% of assets in securities comprising that index.

Why people hold it

  • EMC Actively managed and sub-advised by Mirae Asset's Hong Kong team, which hand-picks emerging-market names it judges best placed to capture domestic spending growth.globalxetfs.com
  • Not fenced into consumer staples and discretionary: managers can own any industry sitting in the path of rising consumption, from banks to airlines.globalxetfs.com
  • Born in 2010 as a Mirae Asset mutual fund, converted to an ETF in 2023 with the same team and process, plus daily holdings disclosure and intraday trading.globalxetfs.comsec.gov
  • Active stock picking at 0.65%, the median expense ratio in its consumer-theme peer group, where most rivals simply track a basket.
  • GENZ At 0.51% a year it undercuts the 0.57% median fee in its thematic peer group, so the theme doesn't carry a novelty markup.
  • Rules over hunches: it replicates the MarketVector Digital Native Economy Index and normally keeps at least 80% of assets in that index's securities.
  • A 2008 launch is old age in thematic land. This fund has traded through multiple full market cycles under the same issuer.

Worth knowing

  • EMC Thinly traded, so spreads can run wider than in the category's heavyweights.
  • No index to hug: the MSCI Emerging Markets Index is the yardstick, not the blueprint, so results ride on the team's calls.globalxetfs.com
  • Index-based cousins in the cohort cost less, with MILN and PAWZ at 0.50%.
  • GENZ Thinly traded with a small asset base, so spreads tend to be wider and the cost of getting in and out is a real part of the bill.
  • Roughly 40 stocks in one theme. Individual names move the fund, and swings can run deeper than a broad US equity index.
  • Cheaper tech-theme options sit in the same cohort (LRND at 0.14%, TECB at 0.30%), and GENZ lands in the lower half of that peer group on our review.

Full EMC profile⁠

Full GENZ profile⁠

EMC vs GENZ Holdings

As of

How EMC and GENZ differ

Overlap by weight

1.3%

Shared holdings make up 2.4% of GENZ and 1.5% of EMC.

Level by level

  • Holdings2 in both1.3%
  • Countryby domicile14.0%
  • Sector10 Sectors85.1%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

Sector weights in EMC and GENZ, widest gap first
SectorMore in EMCMore in GENZ
Consumer DiscretionaryGENZ +7.7 points
IndustrialsEMC +4.5 points
TechnologyGENZ +4.4 points
MaterialsEMC +3.0 points
FinancialsGENZ +2.8 points
EnergyEMC +2.4 points
Real EstateEMC +1.9 points
Health CareEMC +1.6 points
Consumer StaplesEMC +1.4 points
CommunicationEMC +0.2 points

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in EMC and GENZ, widest gap first
CountryMore in EMCMore in GENZ
United StatesGENZ +76.0 points
TaiwanEMC +29.9 points
South KoreaEMC +21.0 points
IndiaEMC +13.1 points
CanadaGENZ +9.0 points
ChinaEMC +8.1 points
Hong KongEMC +3.1 points
BrazilEMC +3.1 points
Other countries (7)EMC +6.6 points

Outside the US: EMC 7% developed, 93% emerging.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • EMC46.0%
  • GENZ68.2%

Securities held

  • EMC69
  • GENZ38

Asset class

EMC
Equity
GENZ
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in EMC67
  • In both2
  • Only in GENZ36

Only in EMC

67 securities, 97.2% of EMC by weight

  • Taiwan Semiconductor Manufac13.76%
  • Samsung Electr-Gdr Reg’s7.08%
  • Mediatek Inc4.30%

Only in GENZ

36 securities, 97.5% of GENZ by weight

  • Shopify Inc10.74%
  • Roblox Corp9.66%
  • Netease Inc7.89%

Weight gaps

All 2 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in EMC and GENZ, widest gap first
HoldingMore in EMCMore in GENZ
Nu Holdings Ltd/Cayman Isl-ANUGENZ +1.19 points
Futu Holdings Ltd-AdrFUTUEMC +0.21 points

All 68 EMC holdings⁠All 38 GENZ holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

EMC vs GENZ Cost

Overpaying EMC vs GENZ

$2,552

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • EMC 0.65%

    $12,717

  • GENZ 0.51%

    $10,165

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • EMC 0.65%
  • GENZ 0.51%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530EMC $12,717GENZ $10,165

Year by year

YearEMCGENZOverpaying
10$1,163$918$245
20$4,440$3,527$913
30$12,717$10,165$2,552

Expense ratio

  • 0.65%EMC
  • 0.51%GENZ, cheaper
  • Middle half of Consumer Lifestyle funds
  • Median 0.54%

GENZ 5th cheapest of 10 funds

EMC 7th cheapest of 10 funds

EMC vs GENZ Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
EMC 0.63%
GENZ 3.83%, better
Payout (12M)
EMC $0.21
GENZ $1.36
Last payment
EMC $0.08
GENZ $1.36
Ex-dividend
EMC Jun 29, 2026
GENZ Dec 22, 2025
Paid on
EMC Jul 7, 2026
GENZ Dec 26, 2025
Frequency
EMC Twice a year
GENZ Annual

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

EMCTwice a year · 6 paymentsAll EMC payments⁠
One bar per payment. 6 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 28, 2023 $0.23; Jun 27, 2024 $0.12; Dec 30, 2024 $0.18; Jun 27, 2025 $0.11; Dec 30, 2025 $0.13; Jun 29, 2026 $0.08. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD
GENZAnnual · 9 paymentsAll GENZ payments⁠
One bar per payment. 9 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 18, 2017 $1.08; Dec 20, 2018 $1.13; Dec 23, 2019 $1.23; Dec 21, 2020 $0.22; Dec 20, 2021 $0.35; Dec 19, 2022 $0.17; Dec 18, 2023 $0.71; Dec 23, 2024 $1.17; Dec 22, 2025 $1.36. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD

EMC vs GENZ Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
EMC 16.1%, betterGENZ 18.2%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
EMC 0.62, betterGENZ −0.12
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
EMC −18.4%since May 2023GENZ −36.8%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
EMC 1.04GENZ 0.96

Popular comparisons

  • EMCCvsMILNB

    Global X Emerging Markets Great Consumer ETF · Global X Millennial Consumer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GENZCvsMILNB

    VanEck Digital Native Economy ETF · Global X Millennial Consumer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.51% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • EMCCvsPEJB

    Global X Emerging Markets Great Consumer ETF · Invesco Dynamic Leisure and Entertainment ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.58%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GENZCvsPEJB

    VanEck Digital Native Economy ETF · Invesco Dynamic Leisure and Entertainment ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.51% · 0.58%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • EMCCvsPAWZC

    Global X Emerging Markets Great Consumer ETF · ProShares Pet Care ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GENZCvsPAWZC

    VanEck Digital Native Economy ETF · ProShares Pet Care ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.51% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.