Skip to content

GENZ vs MILN

VanEck Digital Native Economy ETF

GENZCNasdaq

Global X Millennial Consumer ETF

MILNBNasdaq

Overlap

Expense ratio

MILN −0.01pt a year

GENZ0.51%MILN0.50%

Avg volume · 30D

MILN 5.3×the volume

GENZ1.38KMILN7.31K

10Y return · a year

MILN +9.0pt

GENZ+2.3%MILN+11.3%

GENZ vs MILN Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

−21.7%GENZ−1.0%MILN

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. GENZ −21.7%. MILN −1.0%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−40%−30%−10%10%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
GENZ 0.51%
MILN 0.50%, better
Fund size
GENZ $15M
MILN $89M
1Y total return
GENZ −10.3%
MILN −7.2%, better
Yield (12M)
GENZ 3.83%, better
MILN 0.32%
Holdings
GENZ 42
MILN 82
Avg volume (30D)
GENZ 1.38K sh
MILN 7.31K sh, better
NAV per share
GENZ $35.62
MILN $43.75
52W range

ETF.net Grade

GENZ: Cost 55, Risk 26, Mission not scored, Tradability 39, Holdings 38, Durability 70. MILN: Cost 70, Risk 44, Mission 80, Tradability 75, Holdings 83, Durability 81.
Pillar letters and Scores for GENZ, MILN, with each pillar’s weight
PillarGENZMILN
Cost30% weightB55A70Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredA80
Risk15% weightD26C44Higher
Tradability15% weightD39A75Higher
Holdings10% weightD38A83Higher
Durability5% weightA70A81Higher

Rank among Consumer Lifestyle funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. GENZ and MILN are both graded against the same 10 Consumer Lifestyle funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Consumer Lifestyle⁠

Category · 10 funds
See all 10 ›

MILN ranks 1st and GENZ 4th of 10 funds in the Consumer Lifestyle Category.

  1. Rank 1BMILNGlobal X Millennial Consumer ETFScore 68
  2. Rank 2BPEJInvesco Dynamic Leisure and Entertainment ETFScore 63
  3. Rank 3CPAWZProShares Pet Care ETFScore 53
  4. Rank 4CGENZVanEck Digital Native Economy ETFScore 44
  5. Rank 5CEMCGlobal X Emerging Markets Great Consumer ETFScore 42

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

GENZCVanEck Digital Native Economy ETF

MILNBGlobal X Millennial Consumer ETF

In short

GENZ Longevity is rare in thematics: GENZ dates back to 2008 and today tracks the MarketVector Digital Native Economy Index, roughly 40 US stocks, for 0.51% a year, below its peer group's median fee.

MILN A bet on how a whole generation spends, not on one sector. Since 2016 it has tracked an index of about 80 US companies built around Millennial wallets, an early take on generational themes that costs less than the typical fund in its niche.

Stated mandate

GENZ GENZ seeks to replicate the MarketVector Digital Native Economy Index before fees and expenses. It uses a passive approach and normally invests at least 80% of assets in securities comprising that index.

MILN The fund seeks exposure to companies positioned to benefit from the increasing spending power and distinct consumption preferences of U.S. Millennials.

Why people hold it

  • GENZ At 0.51% a year it undercuts the 0.57% median fee in its thematic peer group, so the theme doesn't carry a novelty markup.
  • Rules over hunches: it replicates the MarketVector Digital Native Economy Index and normally keeps at least 80% of assets in that index's securities.
  • A 2008 launch is old age in thematic land. This fund has traded through multiple full market cycles under the same issuer.
  • MILN Charges 0.50% a year, under the 0.65% median for its consumer-lifestyle peer group. Modest for a single-theme fund.globalxetfs.com
  • Follows a published rulebook, the Indxx Millennials Thematic Index, so holdings answer to the stated mandate rather than a manager's mood.globalxetfs.com
  • The portfolio matches what the label promises: US companies tied to Millennial spending power and tastes, spread across roughly 80 names instead of a two-stock wager.globalxetfs.com
  • Top-quartile standing in a consumer-lifestyle cohort that includes PAWZ, EMC and LOGO, and it undercuts EMC and LOGO on fees.

Worth knowing

  • GENZ Thinly traded with a small asset base, so spreads tend to be wider and the cost of getting in and out is a real part of the bill.
  • Roughly 40 stocks in one theme. Individual names move the fund, and swings can run deeper than a broad US equity index.
  • Cheaper tech-theme options sit in the same cohort (LRND at 0.14%, TECB at 0.30%), and GENZ lands in the lower half of that peer group on our review.
  • MILN Trades thinly. Spreads can run wider than on a mega-cap index fund, so order size and limit prices matter more here.
  • One theme, one country. Roughly 80 US consumer stocks tied to a single spending story can move further, up or down, than a broad market fund.
  • Distributions arrive once or twice a year at most. Income is not what this structure is built around.

Full GENZ profile⁠

Full MILN profile⁠

GENZ vs MILN Holdings

As of
How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

GENZ vs MILN Cost

Overpaying GENZ vs MILN

$186

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • GENZ 0.51%

    $10,165

  • MILN 0.50%

    $9,979

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • GENZ 0.51%
  • MILN 0.50%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5K$5K$7.5K$10K$12.5K051015202530GENZ $10,165MILN $9,979

Year by year

YearGENZMILNOverpaying
10$918$900$18
20$3,527$3,460$67
30$10,165$9,979$186

Expense ratio

  • 0.51%GENZ
  • 0.50%MILN, cheaper
  • Middle half of Consumer Lifestyle funds
  • Median 0.54%

MILN 3rd cheapest of 10 funds

GENZ 5th cheapest of 10 funds

GENZ vs MILN Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
GENZ 3.83%, better
MILN 0.32%
Payout (12M)
GENZ $1.36
MILN $0.14
Last payment
GENZ $1.36
MILN $0.04
Ex-dividend
GENZ Dec 22, 2025
MILN Jun 29, 2026
Paid on
GENZ Dec 26, 2025
MILN Jul 2, 2026
Frequency
GENZ Annual
MILN Twice a year

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

GENZAnnual · 9 paymentsAll GENZ payments⁠
One bar per payment. 9 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 18, 2017 $1.08; Dec 20, 2018 $1.13; Dec 23, 2019 $1.23; Dec 21, 2020 $0.22; Dec 20, 2021 $0.35; Dec 19, 2022 $0.17; Dec 18, 2023 $0.71; Dec 23, 2024 $1.17; Dec 22, 2025 $1.36. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD
MILNTwice a year · 15 paymentsAll MILN payments⁠
One bar per payment. 15 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 28, 2017 $0.17; Dec 28, 2018 $0.09; Jun 27, 2019 $0.02; Dec 30, 2019 $0.09; Jun 29, 2020 $0.02; Dec 30, 2020 $0.06; Dec 30, 2021 $0.07; Dec 29, 2022 $0.06; Jun 29, 2023 $0.0042; Dec 28, 2023 $0.11; Jun 27, 2024 $0.02; Dec 30, 2024 $0.09; Jun 27, 2025 $0.02; Dec 30, 2025 $0.10; Jun 29, 2026 $0.04. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD

GENZ vs MILN Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • GENZ
  • MILN
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: MILN −44.4% · Nov 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−40%−30%−20%−10%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
GENZ 18.2%MILN 17.7%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
GENZ −0.12MILN 0.62, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
GENZ −36.8%, betterMILN −44.4%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
GENZ 0.96MILN 1.15

Popular comparisons

  • GENZCvsPEJB

    VanEck Digital Native Economy ETF · Invesco Dynamic Leisure and Entertainment ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.51% · 0.58%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • MILNBvsPEJB

    Global X Millennial Consumer ETF · Invesco Dynamic Leisure and Entertainment ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.58%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GENZCvsPAWZC

    VanEck Digital Native Economy ETF · ProShares Pet Care ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.51% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • MILNBvsPAWZC

    Global X Millennial Consumer ETF · ProShares Pet Care ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GENZCvsEMCC

    VanEck Digital Native Economy ETF · Global X Emerging Markets Great Consumer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.51% · 0.65%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • MILNBvsEMCC

    Global X Millennial Consumer ETF · Global X Emerging Markets Great Consumer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.65%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.