ILIT ranks 2nd and EMET 5th of 12 funds in the Critical Materials Category.
EMET vs ILIT
ILIT −0.15pt a year
0.62%0.47%
ILIT 2.2×the volume
4.78K10.6K
EMET vs ILIT Performance
−14.8%−29.8%
- EMET 0.62%
- ILIT 0.47%, better
- EMET $30M
- ILIT $10M
- EMET
- ILIT −18.2%
- EMET 1.84%
- ILIT 3.04%, better
- EMET 62
- ILIT 54
- EMET 4.78K sh
- ILIT 10.6K sh, better
- EMET $35.65
- ILIT $10.46
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EMET | ILIT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B58 | A97Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C53Higher | D30 |
| Tradability | C42Higher | D26 |
| Holdings | B68 | B68 |
| Durability | B62Higher | C41 |
Rank among Critical Materials funds
Same Category. EMET and ILIT are both graded against the same 12 Critical Materials funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EMETC
ILITB
In short
EMET Copper is the spine of electrification, but wiring a grid takes a whole shelf of metals. EMET tracks a global index of the companies that mine, refine and recycle them, about 60 names, for 0.62% a year.
ILIT Most lithium funds blend miners with EV makers and battery tech. ILIT stays at the source: an index of global companies whose main business is digging lithium ore or making lithium compounds, about 40 names, for 0.47% a year.
Stated mandate
EMET The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the MarketVector Global Electrification Metals Index. That index covers companies involved in producing, refining, processing, and recycling metals critical to global electrification.
ILIT ILIT aims to replicate an index of U.S. and non-U.S. equity issuers whose principal activities are lithium-ore mining or lithium-compound manufacturing.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EMET vs ILIT Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EMET vs ILIT Cost
Overpaying EMET vs ILIT
$2,761
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EMET 0.62%
$12,179
ILIT 0.47%
$9,418
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EMET | ILIT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,111 | $847 | $264 |
| 20 | $4,246 | $3,261 | $985 |
| 30 | $12,179 | $9,418 | $2,761 |
- 0.62%EMET
- 0.47%ILIT, cheaper
- Middle half of Critical Materials funds
- Median 0.64%
ILIT cheapest of 12 funds
EMET 6th cheapest of 12 funds
EMET vs ILIT Dividends
- EMET 1.84%
- ILIT 3.04%, better
- EMET $0.68
- ILIT $0.32
- EMET $0.68
- ILIT $0.02
- EMET Dec 22, 2025
- ILIT Jun 15, 2026
- EMET Dec 26, 2025
- ILIT Jun 18, 2026
- EMET Annual
- ILIT Twice a year
Distribution history
EMET vs ILIT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EMET ILIT 46.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- EMET ILIT −0.11
- Worst fall
- EMET ILIT −73.7%
- Market sensitivity
- EMET 1.02ILIT 1.66
Popular comparisons
- 0.62% · 0.53%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.47% · 0.53%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.62% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.47% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.62% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.47% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.