Skip to content

EMET vs ILIT

VanEck Copper and Green Metals ETF

EMETCNYSE Arca

iShares Lithium Miners and Producers ETF

ILITBNasdaq

Overlap

Expense ratio

ILIT −0.15pt a year

EMET0.62%ILIT0.47%

Avg volume · 30D

ILIT 2.2×the volume

EMET4.78KILIT10.6K

EMET vs ILIT Performance

Aug 7, 2026 – Nov 9, 2026

−14.8%EMET−29.8%ILIT

Aug 7, 2026 to Nov 9, 2026. EMET −14.8%. ILIT −29.8%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%−10%0%10%Aug 2026Sep 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
EMET 0.62%
ILIT 0.47%, better
Fund size
EMET $30M
ILIT $10M
1Y total return
EMET No data
ILIT −18.2%
Yield (12M)
EMET 1.84%
ILIT 3.04%, better
Holdings
EMET 62
ILIT 54
Avg volume (30D)
EMET 4.78K sh
ILIT 10.6K sh, better
NAV per share
EMET $35.65
ILIT $10.46
52W range

ETF.net Grade

EMET: Cost 58, Risk 53, Mission not scored, Tradability 42, Holdings 68, Durability 62. ILIT: Cost 97, Risk 30, Mission not scored, Tradability 26, Holdings 68, Durability 41.
Pillar letters and Scores for EMET, ILIT, with each pillar’s weight
PillarEMETILIT
Cost30% weightB58A97Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightC53HigherD30
Tradability15% weightC42HigherD26
Holdings10% weightB68B68
Durability5% weightB62HigherC41

Rank among Critical Materials funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. EMET and ILIT are both graded against the same 12 Critical Materials funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Critical Materials⁠

Category · 12 funds
See all 12 ›

ILIT ranks 2nd and EMET 5th of 12 funds in the Critical Materials Category.

  1. Rank 1AREMXVanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETFScore 75
  2. Rank 2BEARTGlobal X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETFScore 61
  3. Rank 2BILITiShares Lithium Miners and Producers ETFScore 61
  4. Rank 4BSETMSprott Critical Materials ETFScore 56
  5. Rank 5CEMETVanEck Copper and Green Metals ETFScore 55
  6. Rank 6CFMTLFirst Trust Indxx Critical Metals ETFScore 53

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

EMETCVanEck Copper and Green Metals ETF

ILITBiShares Lithium Miners and Producers ETF

In short

EMET Copper is the spine of electrification, but wiring a grid takes a whole shelf of metals. EMET tracks a global index of the companies that mine, refine and recycle them, about 60 names, for 0.62% a year.

ILIT Most lithium funds blend miners with EV makers and battery tech. ILIT stays at the source: an index of global companies whose main business is digging lithium ore or making lithium compounds, about 40 names, for 0.47% a year.

Stated mandate

EMET The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the MarketVector Global Electrification Metals Index. That index covers companies involved in producing, refining, processing, and recycling metals critical to global electrification.

ILIT ILIT aims to replicate an index of U.S. and non-U.S. equity issuers whose principal activities are lithium-ore mining or lithium-compound manufacturing.

Why people hold it

  • EMET The mandate reaches past the mine: the index covers producing, refining, processing and recycling of electrification metals, so midstream and scrap names qualify too.vaneck.com
  • 0.62% a year sits just under the midpoint of its critical-materials peer group, and the hunting ground is global rather than one country's mining sector.
  • Not a one-metal wager: copper sits alongside the other metals the index treats as critical to electrification, spread across roughly 60 companies.
  • ILIT Straight to the rock. The index holds only firms whose principal business is lithium-ore mining or lithium-compound manufacturing, so EV assemblers and electronics names stay out.ishares.com
  • 0.47% a year undercuts most of the critical-materials shelf, including SETM (0.65%) and EART (0.59%).
  • Rules-based and transparent: it replicates the STOXX Global Lithium Miners and Producers Index (STXLIMEV) rather than a manager's stock picks.
  • Global by design. The mandate spans US, developed international and emerging market issuers instead of stopping at the US border.

Worth knowing

  • EMET One of the smaller, more thinly traded funds in this corner of the market, so the real cost of getting in and out can exceed the headline fee.
  • Broader metals exposure comes cheaper: PICK (0.39%) and VanEck's own REMX (0.53%) undercut it, though neither is built around the electrification basket.
  • Miner equities move with metal prices, and with a 2021 launch this one has not yet run through a full commodity cycle.
  • ILIT Small asset base and light trading volume, so bid-ask spreads can run wider than on the big diversified mining funds.
  • One metal, roughly 40 stocks. Lithium-linked shares have been a volatile ride, and a portfolio this concentrated feels every move in the metal.
  • Launched in 2023, so the track record is short, and cash distributions land only once or twice a year.

Full EMET profile⁠

Full ILIT profile⁠

EMET vs ILIT Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

EMET vs ILIT Cost

Overpaying EMET vs ILIT

$2,761

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • EMET 0.62%

    $12,179

  • ILIT 0.47%

    $9,418

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • EMET 0.62%
  • ILIT 0.47%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5K$5K$7.5K$10K$12.5K051015202530EMET $12,179ILIT $9,418

Year by year

YearEMETILITOverpaying
10$1,111$847$264
20$4,246$3,261$985
30$12,179$9,418$2,761

Expense ratio

  • 0.62%EMET
  • 0.47%ILIT, cheaper
  • Middle half of Critical Materials funds
  • Median 0.64%

ILIT cheapest of 12 funds

EMET 6th cheapest of 12 funds

EMET vs ILIT Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 9, 2026
Yield (12M)
EMET 1.84%
ILIT 3.04%, better
Payout (12M)
EMET $0.68
ILIT $0.32
Last payment
EMET $0.68
ILIT $0.02
Ex-dividend
EMET Dec 22, 2025
ILIT Jun 15, 2026
Paid on
EMET Dec 26, 2025
ILIT Jun 18, 2026
Frequency
EMET Annual
ILIT Twice a year

Distribution history

Per share, 2022 to 2026, same scale for both

EMETAnnual · 4 paymentsAll EMET payments⁠
One bar per payment. 4 payments from 2022 to 2026 YTD. Dec 19, 2022 $0.73; Dec 18, 2023 $0.49; Dec 23, 2024 $0.39; Dec 22, 2025 $0.68. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.5020232026YTD
ILITTwice a year · 6 paymentsAll ILIT payments⁠
One bar per payment. 6 payments from 2022 to 2026 YTD. Dec 20, 2023 $0.12; Jun 11, 2024 $0.08; Dec 17, 2024 $0.50; Jun 16, 2025 $0.06; Dec 16, 2025 $0.30; Jun 15, 2026 $0.02. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.5020232026YTD

EMET vs ILIT Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
EMET No dataILIT 46.6%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
EMET No dataILIT −0.11
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
EMET No dataILIT −73.7%since Jun 2023
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
EMET 1.02ILIT 1.66

Popular comparisons

  • EMETCvsREMXA

    VanEck Copper and Green Metals ETF · VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.62% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ILITBvsREMXA

    iShares Lithium Miners and Producers ETF · VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.47% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • EMETCvsEARTB

    VanEck Copper and Green Metals ETF · Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.62% · 0.59%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ILITBvsEARTB

    iShares Lithium Miners and Producers ETF · Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.47% · 0.59%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • EMETCvsSETMB

    VanEck Copper and Green Metals ETF · Sprott Critical Materials ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.62% · 0.65%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ILITBvsSETMB

    iShares Lithium Miners and Producers ETF · Sprott Critical Materials ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.47% · 0.65%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.