REMX ranks 1st and EMET 5th of 12 funds in the Critical Materials Category.
EMET vs REMX
REMX −0.09pt a year
0.62%0.53%
REMX 156.1×the volume
4.78K746K
EMET vs REMX Performance
−14.8%−30.3%
- EMET 0.62%
- REMX 0.53%, better
- EMET $30M
- REMX $1.46B
- EMET
- REMX −16.2%
- EMET 1.84%
- REMX 2.42%, better
- EMET 62
- REMX 36
- EMET 4.78K sh
- REMX 746K sh, better
- EMET $35.65
- REMX $51.50
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EMET | REMX |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B58 | A89Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C53Higher | D32 |
| Tradability | C42 | A97Higher |
| Holdings | B68Higher | B55 |
| Durability | B62 | A92Higher |
Rank among Critical Materials funds
Same Category. EMET and REMX are both graded against the same 12 Critical Materials funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EMETC
REMXA
In short
EMET Copper is the spine of electrification, but wiring a grid takes a whole shelf of metals. EMET tracks a global index of the companies that mine, refine and recycle them, about 60 names, for 0.62% a year.
REMX The original rare earths ETF. Trading since 2010, it holds roughly 30 miners, refiners and recyclers of the metals behind magnets, EV motors and defense hardware, in one concentrated global basket priced under most of its critical-materials rivals.
Stated mandate
EMET The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the MarketVector Global Electrification Metals Index. That index covers companies involved in producing, refining, processing, and recycling metals critical to global electrification.
REMX The fund seeks global exposure to companies involved in producing, refining, and recycling rare earth and strategic metals and minerals, while tracking the MVIS Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals Index before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EMET vs REMX Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EMET vs REMX Cost
Overpaying EMET vs REMX
$1,643
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EMET 0.62%
$12,179
REMX 0.53%
$10,536
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EMET | REMX | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,111 | $953 | $158 |
| 20 | $4,246 | $3,658 | $588 |
| 30 | $12,179 | $10,536 | $1,643 |
- 0.62%EMET
- 0.53%REMX, cheaper
- Middle half of Critical Materials funds
- Median 0.64%
REMX 2nd cheapest of 12 funds
EMET 6th cheapest of 12 funds
EMET vs REMX Dividends
- EMET 1.84%
- REMX 2.42%, better
- EMET $0.68
- REMX $1.30
- EMET $0.68
- REMX $1.30
- EMET Dec 22, 2025
- REMX Dec 22, 2025
- EMET Dec 26, 2025
- REMX Dec 26, 2025
- EMET Annual
- REMX Annual
Distribution history
EMET vs REMX Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EMET REMX 45.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- EMET REMX 0.06
- Worst fall
- EMET REMX −73.3%
- Market sensitivity
- EMET 1.02REMX 1.59
EMET and REMX in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.62% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.53% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.62% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.53% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.62% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.53% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.




