EART ranks 2nd and EMET 5th of 12 funds in the Critical Materials Category.
EART vs EMET
EART −0.03pt a year
0.59%0.62%
EART 3.6×the volume
17.1K4.78K
EART vs EMET Performance
−16.3%−14.8%
- EART 0.59%, better
- EMET 0.62%
- EART $41M
- EMET $30M
- EART 0.74%
- EMET 1.84%, better
- EART 51
- EMET 62
- EART 17.1K sh, better
- EMET 4.78K sh
- EART $24.32
- EMET $35.65
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EART | EMET |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B69Higher | B58 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C44 | C53Higher |
| Tradability | C48Higher | C42 |
| Holdings | A78Higher | B68 |
| Durability | A70Higher | B62 |
Rank among Critical Materials funds
Same Category. EART and EMET are both graded against the same 12 Critical Materials funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EARTB
EMETC
In short
EART Rare earths are the headline, but the basket runs wider: ten critical-material categories, from copper and lithium to cobalt and carbon fiber, screened so miners must earn at least half their revenue from the stuff.
EMET Copper is the spine of electrification, but wiring a grid takes a whole shelf of metals. EMET tracks a global index of the companies that mine, refine and recycle them, about 60 names, for 0.62% a year.
Stated mandate
EART The fund seeks exposure to companies producing rare-earth components, metals, and other raw or composite materials needed for expanding critical technologies, including electric vehicles, energy storage, robotics, and radar systems.
EMET The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the MarketVector Global Electrification Metals Index. That index covers companies involved in producing, refining, processing, and recycling metals critical to global electrification.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EART vs EMET Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EART vs EMET Cost
Overpaying EMET vs EART
$544
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EART 0.59%
$11,635
EMET 0.62%
$12,179
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EART | EMET | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,058 | $1,111 | $53 |
| 20 | $4,051 | $4,246 | $195 |
| 30 | $11,635 | $12,179 | $544 |
- 0.59%EART, cheaper
- 0.62%EMET
- Middle half of Critical Materials funds
- Median 0.64%
EART 5th cheapest of 12 funds
EMET 6th cheapest of 12 funds
EART vs EMET Dividends
- EART 0.74%
- EMET 1.84%, better
- EART $0.19
- EMET $0.68
- EART $0.14
- EMET $0.68
- EART Jun 29, 2026
- EMET Dec 22, 2025
- EART Jul 7, 2026
- EMET Dec 26, 2025
- EART Twice a year
- EMET Annual
Distribution history
EART vs EMET Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Market sensitivity
- EART 1.29EMET 1.02
EART and EMET in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.59% · 0.53%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.62% · 0.53%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.62% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.62% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
