Skip to content
etf.net

ENDW vs GMOM

Cambria Endowment Style ETF

ENDWANasdaq

Cambria Global Momentum ETF

GMOMBCboe

Overlap

26.4%by weight

Expense ratio

ENDW −0.73pt a year

ENDW0.22%GMOM0.95%

Avg volume · 30D

ENDW 2.1×the volume

ENDW17.1KGMOM8.17K

ENDW vs GMOM Performance

Nov 3, 2025 – Nov 3, 2026

+14.0%ENDW+16.0%GMOM

Nov 3, 2025 to Nov 3, 2026. ENDW +14.0%. GMOM +16.0%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%5%10%20%Nov 2025May 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
ENDW 0.22%, better
GMOM 0.95%
Fund size
ENDW $160M
GMOM $80M
1Y total return
ENDW +14.0%
GMOM +16.0%, better
Yield (12M)
ENDW 2.39%, better
GMOM 1.55%
Holdings
ENDW 72
GMOM 14
Avg volume (30D)
ENDW 17.1K sh, better
GMOM 8.17K sh
NAV per share
ENDW $34.26
GMOM $37.46
52W range

ETF.net Grade

ENDW: Cost 100, Risk 76, Mission 81, Tradability 70, Holdings 62, Durability 65. GMOM: Cost 44, Risk 45, Mission 71, Tradability 54, Holdings 62, Durability 84.
Pillar letters and Scores for ENDW, GMOM, with each pillar’s weight
PillarENDWGMOM
Cost30% weightA100HigherC44
Mission25% weightA81HigherA71
Risk15% weightA76HigherC45
Tradability15% weightA70HigherC54
Holdings10% weightB62B62
Durability5% weightB65A84Higher

Rank among Tactical Allocation funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. ENDW and GMOM are both graded against the same 46 Tactical Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Tactical Allocation⁠

Category · 46 funds
See all 46 ›

ENDW ranks 1st and GMOM 18th of 46 funds in the Tactical Allocation Category.

  1. Rank 1AENDWCambria Endowment Style ETFScore 81
  2. Rank 2AGMODGMO Dynamic Allocation ETFScore 76
  3. Rank 18BBDGSBridges Capital Tactical ETFScore 56
  4. Rank 18BGMOMCambria Global Momentum ETFScore 56
  5. Rank 20BGMMAGammaRoad Market Navigation ETFScore 55

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

ENDWACambria Endowment Style ETF

GMOMBCambria Global Momentum ETF

In short

ENDW The endowment playbook in one ticker: global stocks, bonds and real assets, actively steered by Cambria, with built-in leverage, for 0.22% a year. Endowment ambition without the endowment fee schedule.

GMOM A go-anywhere trend follower in one ticker: GMOM ranks global stock, bond, commodity and currency ETFs, holds what is trending up, and can retreat to cash and short-term bonds when trends break. Live since 2014, 0.95% all-in.

Stated mandate

ENDW ENDW seeks income and capital appreciation. It is actively managed to provide exposure to multiple major asset classes through underlying ETFs or individual equities.

GMOM The fund seeks capital preservation and growth through a disciplined, globally diversified quantitative approach spanning equity, fixed income, commodities, and currencies, without depending on a particular market direction.

Why people hold it

  • ENDW 0.22% a year against a roughly 0.95% median for tactical allocation funds, and cheaper than the other standouts in the group such as ONOF (0.39%) and GMOD (0.50%).
  • One ticker spans US, developed and emerging markets across equities, bonds and real assets, roughly 70 positions, with value and momentum screens applied on top.cambriafunds.com
  • Capital efficient by design: the manager expects notional exposure of 100% to 150% of assets, using Treasury futures alongside the underlying ETF sleeves.usnews.combusinesswire.com
  • Pays income quarterly, and on our review it sits among the strongest implementations in the tactical allocation group.
  • GMOM Owns ETFs, not single names: a broad global menu of equity, bond, commodity and currency funds, sorted by momentum and long-term trend, with cash and bonds as the fallback.cambriafunds.com
  • Of the 0.95% total expense ratio, 0.36 points is the fee on the ETFs it holds; the rest is the management fee. Near the typical cost in its tactical multi-asset group.cambriafunds.com
  • Trading since November 2014 and run by Cambria founder Meb Faber on his own published tactical-allocation research, so the rulebook predates the fund.cambriafunds.comcambriafunds.com 2

Worth knowing

  • ENDW It owns other ETFs, which charge their own fees on top of the 0.22% management fee, so the all-in cost of ownership runs higher than the headline.cambriafunds.com
  • Leverage works both ways. Notional exposure above 100% of assets magnifies moves in either direction, and Cambria itself calls the risk profile aggressive.businesswire.com
  • Launched in 2025 and still modest in size, so the record is short and shares change hands less often than mainstream index funds.
  • GMOM Thinly traded next to the giants of multi-asset investing, so the bid-ask spread can matter more than the expense ratio on small orders.
  • Trend rules look backward: the fund can sit out the start of a rally and can whipsaw in choppy, directionless markets. That is the mechanism working as written.cambriafunds.com
  • Cambria's own ENDW sits in the same tactical multi-asset category at 0.22%, so this fund's trend engine is the costlier route from the same shop.

Full ENDW profile⁠

Full GMOM profile⁠

ENDW vs GMOM Holdings

How ENDW and GMOM differ

Overlap by weight

26.4%

Shared holdings make up 41.1% of GMOM and 26.4% of ENDW.

Level by level

  • Holdings4 in both26.4%
  • Countryby domicile80.1%
  • Sector11 Sectors82.6%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

Sector weights in ENDW and GMOM, widest gap first
SectorMore in ENDWMore in GMOMGap
EnergyGMOM +7.9 points
Real EstateENDW +6.9 points
Health CareENDW +3.9 points
IndustrialsGMOM +3.7 points
MaterialsGMOM +3.2 points
FinancialsENDW +3.0 points
Consumer DiscretionaryENDW +2.6 points
TechnologyGMOM +2.6 points
CommunicationENDW +0.8 points
Consumer StaplesENDW +0.1 points
UtilitiesSame weight

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in ENDW and GMOM, widest gap first
CountryMore in ENDWMore in GMOMGap
United StatesENDW +19.1 points
United KingdomGMOM +3.2 points
CanadaGMOM +2.1 points
South AfricaGMOM +1.7 points
ChinaGMOM +1.3 points
BrazilGMOM +1.3 points
PolandGMOM +1.2 points
TaiwanGMOM +0.9 points
Other countries (29)GMOM +7.4 points

Outside the US: ENDW 52% developed, 48% emerging. GMOM 51% developed, 49% emerging.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • ENDW72.7%
  • GMOM83.4%

Securities held

  • ENDW72
  • GMOM14

Asset class

ENDW
Equity
GMOM
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in ENDW68
  • In both4
  • Only in GMOM10

Only in ENDW

68 securities, 73.6% of ENDW by weight

  • US 10YR NOTE (CBT)Dec2622.56%
  • Cambria Value and Momentum ETF7.46%
  • State Street SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF4.41%

Only in GMOM

10 securities, 59.0% of GMOM by weight

  • Cambria Micro and SmallCap Shareholder Yield ETF11.09%
  • iShares Global Energy ETF6.72%
  • Invesco DB Energy Fund6.59%

Weight gaps

All 4 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in ENDW and GMOM, widest gap first
HoldingMore in ENDWMore in GMOMGap
Cambria Global Value ETFGVALGMOM +7.78 points
Cambria Emerging Shareholder Yield ETFEYLDGMOM +3.55 points
Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETFFYLDGMOM +1.83 points
Cambria Chesapeake Pure Trend ETFMFUTGMOM +1.51 points

All 72 ENDW holdings⁠All 14 GMOM holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

ENDW vs GMOM Cost

Overpaying GMOM vs ENDW

$13,311

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • ENDW 0.22%

    $4,558

  • GMOM 0.95%

    $17,869

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • ENDW 0.22%
  • GMOM 0.95%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530GMOM $17,869ENDW $4,558

Year by year

YearENDWGMOMOverpaying
10$401$1,678$1,277
20$1,561$6,322$4,761
30$4,558$17,869$13,311

Expense ratio

  • 0.22%ENDW, cheaper
  • 0.95%GMOM
  • Middle half of Tactical Allocation funds
  • Median 0.93%

ENDW cheapest of 46 funds

GMOM 25th cheapest of 46 funds

ENDW vs GMOM Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 3, 2026
Yield (12M)
ENDW 2.39%, better
GMOM 1.55%
Payout (12M)
ENDW $0.82
GMOM $0.58
Last payment
ENDW $0.16
GMOM $0.10
Ex-dividend
ENDW Sep 28, 2026
GMOM Sep 22, 2026
Paid on
ENDW Sep 30, 2026
GMOM Sep 23, 2026
Frequency
ENDW Quarterly
GMOM Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

ENDWQuarterly · 6 paymentsAll ENDW payments⁠
One bar per payment. 6 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Jun 27, 2025 $0.06; Sep 29, 2025 $0.18; Dec 30, 2025 $0.35; Mar 30, 2026 $0.16; Jun 29, 2026 $0.15; Sep 28, 2026 $0.16. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502017202020232026YTD
GMOMQuarterly · 38 paymentsAll GMOM payments⁠
One bar per payment. 38 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 29, 2017 $0.06; Jun 28, 2017 $0.25; Sep 27, 2017 $0.12; Dec 28, 2017 $0.14; Jun 28, 2018 $0.16; Sep 27, 2018 $0.06; Dec 27, 2018 $0.25; Mar 29, 2019 $0.13; Jun 28, 2019 $0.12; Sep 27, 2019 $0.17; Dec 27, 2019 $0.25; Mar 27, 2020 $0.02; Jun 26, 2020 $0.06; Sep 25, 2020 $0.05; Dec 24, 2020 $0.19; Mar 26, 2021 $0.02; Jun 25, 2021 $0.16; Sep 24, 2021 $0.25; Dec 23, 2021 $0.59; Mar 28, 2022 $0.31; Jun 24, 2022 $0.14; Sep 23, 2022 $0.01; Dec 23, 2022 $0.25; Mar 27, 2023 $0.18; Jun 23, 2023 $0.35; Sep 22, 2023 $0.02; Dec 22, 2023 $0.44; Mar 22, 2024 $0.10; Jun 24, 2024 $0.10; Sep 23, 2024 $0.36; Dec 23, 2024 $0.07; Mar 25, 2025 $0.46; Jun 24, 2025 $0.20; Sep 23, 2025 $0.07; Dec 23, 2025 $0.28; Mar 25, 2026 $0.04; Jun 23, 2026 $0.15; Sep 22, 2026 $0.10. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502017202020232026YTD

ENDW vs GMOM Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
ENDW 9.2%since May 2025GMOM 10.6%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
ENDW 1.99since May 2025GMOM 1.05
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
ENDW −6.4%since Apr 2025GMOM −19.2%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
ENDW 0.59GMOM 0.96

Popular comparisons

  • ENDWAvsGMODA

    Cambria Endowment Style ETF · GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.22% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • GMOMBvsGMODA

    Cambria Global Momentum ETF · GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.95% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • ENDWAvsPTBDA

    Cambria Endowment Style ETF · Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.22% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • GMOMBvsPTBDA

    Cambria Global Momentum ETF · Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.95% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • ENDWAvsRISNA

    Cambria Endowment Style ETF · Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.22% · 0.72%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • GMOMBvsRISNA

    Cambria Global Momentum ETF · Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.95% · 0.72%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.