Skip to content

GMOD vs GMOM

GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF

GMODANYSE Arca

Cambria Global Momentum ETF

GMOMBCboe

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

GMOD −0.45pt a year

GMOD0.50%GMOM0.95%

Avg volume · 30D

GMOD 1.4×the volume

GMOD11.8KGMOM8.17K

GMOD vs GMOM Performance

Nov 3, 2025 – Nov 3, 2026

+11.7%GMOD+16.0%GMOM

Nov 3, 2025 to Nov 3, 2026. GMOD +11.7%. GMOM +16.0%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%5%20%Nov 2025May 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
GMOD 0.50%, better
GMOM 0.95%
Fund size
GMOD $51M
GMOM $80M
1Y total return
GMOD +11.7%
GMOM +16.0%, better
Yield (12M)
GMOD No data
GMOM 1.55%
Holdings
GMOD 21
GMOM 14
Avg volume (30D)
GMOD 11.8K sh, better
GMOM 8.17K sh
NAV per share
GMOD $27.81
GMOM $37.46
52W range

ETF.net Grade

GMOD: Cost 90, Risk 76, Mission 74, Tradability 72, Holdings 66, Durability 49. GMOM: Cost 44, Risk 45, Mission 71, Tradability 54, Holdings 62, Durability 84.
Pillar letters and Scores for GMOD, GMOM, with each pillar’s weight
PillarGMODGMOM
Cost30% weightA90HigherC44
Mission25% weightA74HigherA71
Risk15% weightA76HigherC45
Tradability15% weightA72HigherC54
Holdings10% weightB66HigherB62
Durability5% weightC49A84Higher

Rank among Tactical Allocation funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. GMOD and GMOM are both graded against the same 46 Tactical Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Tactical Allocation⁠

Category · 46 funds
See all 46 ›

GMOD ranks 2nd and GMOM 18th of 46 funds in the Tactical Allocation Category.

  1. Rank 1AENDWCambria Endowment Style ETFScore 81
  2. Rank 2AGMODGMO Dynamic Allocation ETFScore 76
  3. Rank 3APTBDPacer Trendpilot US Bond ETFScore 72
  4. Rank 18BBDGSBridges Capital Tactical ETFScore 56
  5. Rank 18BGMOMCambria Global Momentum ETFScore 56
  6. Rank 20BGMMAGammaRoad Market Navigation ETFScore 55

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

GMODAGMO Dynamic Allocation ETF

GMOMBCambria Global Momentum ETF

In short

GMOD GMO's 7-year asset class forecasts, finally wrapped in an ETF. It tilts toward what the firm's valuation models call cheap and away from what they call expensive, shifting between stocks, bonds and alternatives inside one ticker.

GMOM A go-anywhere trend follower in one ticker: GMOM ranks global stock, bond, commodity and currency ETFs, holds what is trending up, and can retreat to cash and short-term bonds when trends break. Live since 2014, 0.95% all-in.

Stated mandate

GMOD The Fund seeks positive total return. It allocates among asset classes using GMO's multi-year return forecasts and relative-risk assessments.

GMOM The fund seeks capital preservation and growth through a disciplined, globally diversified quantitative approach spanning equity, fixed income, commodities, and currencies, without depending on a particular market direction.

Why people hold it

  • GMOD 0.50% all-in, about half the typical fee in its tactical-allocation peer group, and a contractual waiver offsets the fees of the GMO funds it holds so costs are not stacked.sec.gov
  • GMO's first multi-asset strategy in an ETF, run by the asset allocation team behind the firm's long-running 7-year asset class forecasts.gmo.com
  • The equity dial can swing between 40% and 80% of assets under normal conditions, so the fund handles the reallocating rather than you selling positions to do it.gmo.com
  • Sits in the upper tier of a crowded tactical multi-asset group on cost and process clarity.
  • GMOM Owns ETFs, not single names: a broad global menu of equity, bond, commodity and currency funds, sorted by momentum and long-term trend, with cash and bonds as the fallback.cambriafunds.com
  • Of the 0.95% total expense ratio, 0.36 points is the fee on the ETFs it holds; the rest is the management fee. Near the typical cost in its tactical multi-asset group.cambriafunds.com
  • Trading since November 2014 and run by Cambria founder Meb Faber on his own published tactical-allocation research, so the rulebook predates the fund.cambriafunds.comcambriafunds.com 2

Worth knowing

  • GMOD New in 2025 and lightly traded so far, which can mean wider bid-ask spreads than the big allocation ETFs.
  • It owns other GMO funds, and the single 0.50% rate leans on a contractual waiver with an expiration date rather than a permanent cap.sec.gov
  • Cheaper tactical allocators exist (ENDW at 0.22%, ONOF at 0.39%), though each runs a different process.
  • GMOM Thinly traded next to the giants of multi-asset investing, so the bid-ask spread can matter more than the expense ratio on small orders.
  • Trend rules look backward: the fund can sit out the start of a rally and can whipsaw in choppy, directionless markets. That is the mechanism working as written.cambriafunds.com
  • Cambria's own ENDW sits in the same tactical multi-asset category at 0.22%, so this fund's trend engine is the costlier route from the same shop.

Full GMOD profile⁠

Full GMOM profile⁠

GMOD vs GMOM Holdings

How GMOD and GMOM differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of GMOD and 0.0% of GMOM.

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Countryby domicile64.5%
  • Sector11 Sectors78.4%

Sector

Sector weights in GMOD and GMOM, widest gap first
SectorMore in GMODMore in GMOMGap
EnergyGMOM +14.1 points
Health CareGMOD +10.1 points
MaterialsGMOM +3.6 points
FinancialsGMOD +3.0 points
CommunicationGMOD +2.7 points
Consumer StaplesGMOD +2.4 points
IndustrialsGMOM +2.3 points
Consumer DiscretionaryGMOD +1.8 points
TechnologyGMOD +1.5 points
UtilitiesGMOM +1.3 points
Real EstateGMOM +0.2 points

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in GMOD and GMOM, widest gap first
CountryMore in GMODMore in GMOMGap
United StatesGMOD +27.3 points
South AfricaGMOM +4.8 points
United KingdomGMOM +4.0 points
ChinaGMOM +3.6 points
PolandGMOM +2.4 points
JapanGMOD +2.3 points
ThailandGMOM +2.2 points
BrazilGMOM +2.3 points
Other countries (33)GMOM +10.4 points

Outside the US: GMOD 73% developed, 27% emerging. GMOM 51% developed, 49% emerging.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • GMOD74.6%
  • GMOM83.4%

Securities held

  • GMOD20
  • GMOM14

Asset class

GMOD
Multi-Asset
GMOM
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in GMOD20
  • In both0
  • Only in GMOM14

Only in GMOD

20 securities, 97.4% of GMOD by weight

  • Ishares 7 10 Year Treasury Bon13.60%
  • Schwab Us Tips Etf9.72%
  • Gmo Us Quality Etf9.50%

Only in GMOM

14 securities, 100% of GMOM by weight

  • Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF12.01%
  • Cambria Global Value ETF11.98%
  • Cambria Emerging Shareholder Yield ETF11.49%

Weight gaps

GMOD and GMOM share no securities.

All GMOD holdings⁠All 14 GMOM holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

GMOD vs GMOM Cost

Overpaying GMOM vs GMOD

$7,890

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • GMOD 0.50%

    $9,979

  • GMOM 0.95%

    $17,869

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • GMOD 0.50%
  • GMOM 0.95%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530GMOM $17,869GMOD $9,979

Year by year

YearGMODGMOMOverpaying
10$900$1,678$778
20$3,460$6,322$2,862
30$9,979$17,869$7,890

Expense ratio

  • 0.50%GMOD, cheaper
  • 0.95%GMOM
  • Middle half of Tactical Allocation funds
  • Median 0.93%

GMOD 6th cheapest of 46 funds

GMOM 25th cheapest of 46 funds

GMOD vs GMOM Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 3, 2026
Yield (12M)
GMOD No data
GMOM 1.55%
Payout (12M)
GMOD No data
GMOM $0.58
Last payment
GMOD $0.14
GMOM $0.10
Ex-dividend
GMOD Jun 30, 2026
GMOM Sep 22, 2026
Paid on
GMOD Jul 1, 2026
GMOM Sep 23, 2026
Frequency
GMOD Twice a year
GMOM Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

GMODTwice a year · 2 paymentsAll GMOD payments⁠
One bar per payment. 2 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 30, 2025 $0.24; Jun 30, 2026 $0.14. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502017202020232026YTD
GMOMQuarterly · 38 paymentsAll GMOM payments⁠
One bar per payment. 38 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 29, 2017 $0.06; Jun 28, 2017 $0.25; Sep 27, 2017 $0.12; Dec 28, 2017 $0.14; Jun 28, 2018 $0.16; Sep 27, 2018 $0.06; Dec 27, 2018 $0.25; Mar 29, 2019 $0.13; Jun 28, 2019 $0.12; Sep 27, 2019 $0.17; Dec 27, 2019 $0.25; Mar 27, 2020 $0.02; Jun 26, 2020 $0.06; Sep 25, 2020 $0.05; Dec 24, 2020 $0.19; Mar 26, 2021 $0.02; Jun 25, 2021 $0.16; Sep 24, 2021 $0.25; Dec 23, 2021 $0.59; Mar 28, 2022 $0.31; Jun 24, 2022 $0.14; Sep 23, 2022 $0.01; Dec 23, 2022 $0.25; Mar 27, 2023 $0.18; Jun 23, 2023 $0.35; Sep 22, 2023 $0.02; Dec 22, 2023 $0.44; Mar 22, 2024 $0.10; Jun 24, 2024 $0.10; Sep 23, 2024 $0.36; Dec 23, 2024 $0.07; Mar 25, 2025 $0.46; Jun 24, 2025 $0.20; Sep 23, 2025 $0.07; Dec 23, 2025 $0.28; Mar 25, 2026 $0.04; Jun 23, 2026 $0.15; Sep 22, 2026 $0.10. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502017202020232026YTD

GMOD vs GMOM Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
GMOD 8.7%since Nov 2025GMOM 10.6%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
GMOD 0.89since Nov 2025GMOM 1.05
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
GMOD −6.5%since Oct 2025GMOM −19.2%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
GMOD 0.48GMOM 0.96

Popular comparisons

  • GMODAvsENDWA

    GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF · Cambria Endowment Style ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.22%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GMOMBvsENDWA

    Cambria Global Momentum ETF · Cambria Endowment Style ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.95% · 0.22%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GMODAvsPTBDA

    GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF · Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GMOMBvsPTBDA

    Cambria Global Momentum ETF · Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.95% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GMODAvsRISNA

    GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF · Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.72%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GMOMBvsRISNA

    Cambria Global Momentum ETF · Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.95% · 0.72%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.