PTBD ranks 3rd and GMOM 18th of 46 funds in the Tactical Allocation Category.
GMOM vs PTBD
PTBD −0.35pt a year
0.95%0.60%
PTBD 2.3×the volume
8.17K18.8K
GMOM +8.4pt
+6.7%−1.7%
GMOM vs PTBD Performance
+38.2%−8.1%
- GMOM 0.95%
- PTBD 0.60%, better
- GMOM $80M
- PTBD $83M
- GMOM +16.0%, better
- PTBD +0.1%
- GMOM 1.55%
- PTBD 6.35%, better
- GMOM 14
- PTBD 1050
- GMOM 8.17K sh
- PTBD 18.8K sh, better
- GMOM $37.46
- PTBD $18.38
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GMOM | PTBD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C44 | A83Higher |
| Mission | A71 | |
| Risk | C45 | B60Higher |
| Tradability | C54Higher | C49 |
| Holdings | B62 | A90Higher |
| Durability | A84Higher | A83 |
Rank among Tactical Allocation funds
Same Category. GMOM and PTBD are both graded against the same 46 Tactical Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GMOMB
PTBDA
In short
GMOM A go-anywhere trend follower in one ticker: GMOM ranks global stock, bond, commodity and currency ETFs, holds what is trending up, and can retreat to cash and short-term bonds when trends break. Live since 2014, 0.95% all-in.
PTBD Trend following, pointed at bonds instead of stocks. A published rulebook shifts PTBD between high yield corporates and intermediate Treasuries as their relative strength changes, dialing credit risk up or down by formula rather than by opinion.
Stated mandate
GMOM The fund seeks capital preservation and growth through a disciplined, globally diversified quantitative approach spanning equity, fixed income, commodities, and currencies, without depending on a particular market direction.
PTBD The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the Pacer Trendpilot US Bond Index through a rules-based strategy that alternates between high-yield corporate bonds and U.S. Treasury bonds.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GMOM vs PTBD Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GMOM vs PTBD Cost
Overpaying GMOM vs PTBD
$6,052
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GMOM 0.95%
$17,869
PTBD 0.60%
$11,817
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GMOM | PTBD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,678 | $1,076 | $602 |
| 20 | $6,322 | $4,116 | $2,206 |
| 30 | $17,869 | $11,817 | $6,052 |
- 0.95%GMOM
- 0.60%PTBD, cheaper
- Middle half of Tactical Allocation funds
- Median 0.93%
PTBD 8th cheapest of 46 funds
GMOM 25th cheapest of 46 funds
GMOM vs PTBD Dividends
- GMOM 1.55%
- PTBD 6.35%, better
- GMOM $0.58
- PTBD $1.17
- GMOM $0.10
- PTBD $0.10
- GMOM Sep 22, 2026
- PTBD Oct 22, 2026
- GMOM Sep 23, 2026
- PTBD Oct 26, 2026
- GMOM Quarterly
- PTBD Monthly
Distribution history
GMOM vs PTBD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- GMOM
- PTBD
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GMOM 10.6%PTBD 5.2%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- GMOM 1.05, betterPTBD 0.08
- Worst fall
- GMOM −19.2%, betterPTBD −24.8%
- Market sensitivity
- GMOM 0.96PTBD 0.74
Popular comparisons
- 0.95% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.72%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.72%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.