Skip to content

ENDW vs MPRO

Cambria Endowment Style ETF

ENDWANasdaq

Monarch ProCap ETF

MPROCCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

ENDW −0.81pt a year

ENDW0.22%MPRO1.03%

Avg volume · 30D

MPRO 1.4×the volume

ENDW17.1KMPRO23.3K

ENDW vs MPRO Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+14.9%ENDW+12.0%MPRO

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. ENDW +14.9%. MPRO +12.0%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%5%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
ENDW 0.22%, better
MPRO 1.03%
Fund size
ENDW $160M
MPRO $253M
1Y total return
ENDW +14.9%, better
MPRO +12.0%
Yield (12M)
ENDW 2.37%, better
MPRO 1.80%
Holdings
ENDW 73
MPRO 7
Avg volume (30D)
ENDW 17.1K sh
MPRO 23.3K sh, better
NAV per share
ENDW $34.35
MPRO $32.93
52W range

ETF.net Grade

ENDW: Cost 100, Risk 75, Mission 81, Tradability 69, Holdings 62, Durability 65. MPRO: Cost 27, Risk 76, Mission 35, Tradability 79, Holdings 37, Durability 78.
Pillar letters and Scores for ENDW, MPRO, with each pillar’s weight
PillarENDWMPRO
Cost30% weightA100HigherD27
Mission25% weightA81HigherD35
Risk15% weightA75A76Higher
Tradability15% weightB69A79Higher
Holdings10% weightB62HigherD37
Durability5% weightB65A78Higher

Rank among Tactical Allocation funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. ENDW and MPRO are both graded against the same 46 Tactical Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Tactical Allocation⁠

Category · 46 funds
See all 46 ›

ENDW ranks 1st and MPRO 29th of 46 funds in the Tactical Allocation Category.

  1. Rank 1AENDWCambria Endowment Style ETFScore 81
  2. Rank 2AGMODGMO Dynamic Allocation ETFScore 76
  3. Rank 29CDALIFirst Trust Dorsey Wright DALI Equity ETFScore 47
  4. Rank 29CMPROMonarch ProCap ETFScore 47
  5. Rank 32CTSPXTwin Oak Active Opportunities ETFScore 45

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

ENDWACambria Endowment Style ETF

MPROCMonarch ProCap ETF

In short

ENDW The endowment playbook in one ticker: global stocks, bonds and real assets, actively steered by Cambria, with built-in leverage, for 0.22% a year. Endowment ambition without the endowment fee schedule.

MPRO MPRO reads employment data to place the economy in one of four cycle phases, then rotates a 6-to-9 ETF portfolio across bonds, five stock sectors and a dash of gold. Rules-based macro allocation in one ticker, at 1.03% with no waiver.

Stated mandate

ENDW ENDW seeks income and capital appreciation. It is actively managed to provide exposure to multiple major asset classes through underlying ETFs or individual equities.

MPRO The Fund seeks to replicate, before fees and expenses, the performance of the Monarch ProCap Index. It uses a replication-indexing strategy to pursue that objective.

Why people hold it

  • ENDW 0.22% a year against a roughly 0.95% median for tactical allocation funds, and cheaper than the other standouts in the group such as ONOF (0.39%) and GMOD (0.50%).
  • One ticker spans US, developed and emerging markets across equities, bonds and real assets, roughly 70 positions, with value and momentum screens applied on top.cambriafunds.com
  • Capital efficient by design: the manager expects notional exposure of 100% to 150% of assets, using Treasury futures alongside the underlying ETF sleeves.usnews.combusinesswire.com
  • Pays income quarterly, and on our review it sits among the strongest implementations in the tactical allocation group.
  • MPRO The macro playbook in one ticker: the index sorts the cycle into expansion, peak, contraction or trough, then sets the bond/stock split and picks five of the eleven GICS sectors.sec.gov
  • Guardrails are written down, not improvised: 6 to 9 holdings, stocks and bonds each held between 15% and 75%, and up to 10% in alternatives such as gold or currency ETFs.sec.gov
  • Running since 2021 and now a fund in the hundreds of millions, with Kingsview building the index and Penserra on the trading desk. Distributions come quarterly.sec.gov

Worth knowing

  • ENDW It owns other ETFs, which charge their own fees on top of the 0.22% management fee, so the all-in cost of ownership runs higher than the headline.cambriafunds.com
  • Leverage works both ways. Notional exposure above 100% of assets magnifies moves in either direction, and Cambria itself calls the risk profile aggressive.businesswire.com
  • Launched in 2025 and still modest in size, so the record is short and shares change hands less often than mainstream index funds.
  • MPRO At 1.03% it sits above the typical fee in its tactical multi-asset category, and above rules-based peers like ENDW at 0.22% or GMOD at 0.50% net of a waiver through June 30, 2027.
  • The equity sleeve owns five of eleven sectors at a time, so when the cycle call changes the portfolio reshuffles and sector bets can run well off the broad market.sec.gov
  • It buys other ETFs, so those funds' own expenses ride underneath, and shares trade lightly enough that the bid/ask gap is worth checking.sec.gov

Full ENDW profile⁠

Full MPRO profile⁠

ENDW vs MPRO Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

ENDW vs MPRO Cost

Overpaying MPRO vs ENDW

$14,615

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • ENDW 0.22%

    $4,558

  • MPRO 1.03%

    $19,173

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • ENDW 0.22%
  • MPRO 1.03%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530MPRO $19,173ENDW $4,558

Year by year

YearENDWMPROOverpaying
10$401$1,814$1,413
20$1,561$6,807$5,246
30$4,558$19,173$14,615

Expense ratio

  • 0.22%ENDW, cheaper
  • 1.03%MPRO
  • Middle half of Tactical Allocation funds
  • Median 0.93%

ENDW cheapest of 46 funds

MPRO 33rd cheapest of 46 funds

ENDW vs MPRO Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
ENDW 2.37%, better
MPRO 1.80%
Payout (12M)
ENDW $0.82
MPRO $0.60
Last payment
ENDW $0.16
MPRO $0.16
Ex-dividend
ENDW Sep 28, 2026
MPRO Sep 24, 2026
Paid on
ENDW Sep 30, 2026
MPRO Sep 29, 2026
Frequency
ENDW Quarterly
MPRO Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2021 to 2026, same scale for both

ENDWQuarterly · 6 paymentsAll ENDW payments⁠
One bar per payment. 6 payments from 2021 to 2026 YTD. Jun 27, 2025 $0.06; Sep 29, 2025 $0.18; Dec 30, 2025 $0.35; Mar 30, 2026 $0.16; Jun 29, 2026 $0.15; Sep 28, 2026 $0.16. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.2520232026YTD
MPROQuarterly · 22 paymentsAll MPRO payments⁠
One bar per payment. 22 payments from 2021 to 2026 YTD. Jun 25, 2021 $0.02; Sep 24, 2021 $0.07; Dec 20, 2021 $0.17; Mar 25, 2022 $0.04; Jun 24, 2022 $0.09; Sep 23, 2022 $0.05; Dec 20, 2022 $0.08; Mar 24, 2023 $0.04; Jun 23, 2023 $0.18; Sep 22, 2023 $0.06; Dec 20, 2023 $0.09; Mar 27, 2024 $0.07; Jun 27, 2024 $0.12; Sep 26, 2024 $0.14; Dec 19, 2024 $0.15; Mar 27, 2025 $0.08; Jun 27, 2025 $0.12; Sep 26, 2025 $0.19; Dec 18, 2025 $0.20; Mar 26, 2026 $0.09; Jun 25, 2026 $0.14; Sep 24, 2026 $0.16. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.2520232026YTD

ENDW vs MPRO Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
ENDW 9.2%since May 2025MPRO 9.0%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
ENDW 1.99since May 2025MPRO 0.93
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
ENDW −6.4%since Apr 2025MPRO −14.5%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
ENDW 0.61MPRO 0.87

Popular comparisons

  • ENDWAvsGMODA

    Cambria Endowment Style ETF · GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.22% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • MPROCvsGMODA

    Monarch ProCap ETF · GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.03% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ENDWAvsPTBDA

    Cambria Endowment Style ETF · Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.22% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • MPROCvsPTBDA

    Monarch ProCap ETF · Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.03% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ENDWAvsRISNA

    Cambria Endowment Style ETF · Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.22% · 0.72%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • MPROCvsRISNA

    Monarch ProCap ETF · Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.03% · 0.72%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.