Skip to content

GMOD vs MPRO

GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF

GMODANYSE Arca

Monarch ProCap ETF

MPROCCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

GMOD −0.53pt a year

GMOD0.50%MPRO1.03%

Avg volume · 30D

MPRO 2.0×the volume

GMOD11.8KMPRO23.3K

GMOD vs MPRO Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+11.8%GMOD+12.0%MPRO

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. GMOD +11.8%. MPRO +12.0%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%2.5%5%7.5%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
GMOD 0.50%, better
MPRO 1.03%
Fund size
GMOD $49M
MPRO $253M
1Y total return
GMOD +11.8%
MPRO +12.0%, better
Yield (12M)
GMOD No data
MPRO 1.80%
Holdings
GMOD 20
MPRO 7
Avg volume (30D)
GMOD 11.8K sh
MPRO 23.3K sh, better
NAV per share
GMOD $27.77
MPRO $32.93
52W range

ETF.net Grade

GMOD: Cost 90, Risk 75, Mission 74, Tradability 73, Holdings 64, Durability 49. MPRO: Cost 27, Risk 76, Mission 35, Tradability 79, Holdings 37, Durability 78.
Pillar letters and Scores for GMOD, MPRO, with each pillar’s weight
PillarGMODMPRO
Cost30% weightA90HigherD27
Mission25% weightA74HigherD35
Risk15% weightA75A76Higher
Tradability15% weightA73A79Higher
Holdings10% weightB64HigherD37
Durability5% weightC49A78Higher

Rank among Tactical Allocation funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. GMOD and MPRO are both graded against the same 46 Tactical Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Tactical Allocation⁠

Category · 46 funds
See all 46 ›

GMOD ranks 2nd and MPRO 29th of 46 funds in the Tactical Allocation Category.

  1. Rank 1AENDWCambria Endowment Style ETFScore 81
  2. Rank 2AGMODGMO Dynamic Allocation ETFScore 76
  3. Rank 3APTBDPacer Trendpilot US Bond ETFScore 72
  4. Rank 29CDALIFirst Trust Dorsey Wright DALI Equity ETFScore 47
  5. Rank 29CMPROMonarch ProCap ETFScore 47
  6. Rank 32CTSPXTwin Oak Active Opportunities ETFScore 45

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

GMODAGMO Dynamic Allocation ETF

MPROCMonarch ProCap ETF

In short

GMOD GMO's 7-year asset class forecasts, finally wrapped in an ETF. It tilts toward what the firm's valuation models call cheap and away from what they call expensive, shifting between stocks, bonds and alternatives inside one ticker.

MPRO MPRO reads employment data to place the economy in one of four cycle phases, then rotates a 6-to-9 ETF portfolio across bonds, five stock sectors and a dash of gold. Rules-based macro allocation in one ticker, at 1.03% with no waiver.

Stated mandate

GMOD The Fund seeks positive total return. It allocates among asset classes using GMO's multi-year return forecasts and relative-risk assessments.

MPRO The Fund seeks to replicate, before fees and expenses, the performance of the Monarch ProCap Index. It uses a replication-indexing strategy to pursue that objective.

Why people hold it

  • GMOD 0.50% all-in, about half the typical fee in its tactical-allocation peer group, and a contractual waiver offsets the fees of the GMO funds it holds so costs are not stacked.sec.gov
  • GMO's first multi-asset strategy in an ETF, run by the asset allocation team behind the firm's long-running 7-year asset class forecasts.gmo.com
  • The equity dial can swing between 40% and 80% of assets under normal conditions, so the fund handles the reallocating rather than you selling positions to do it.gmo.com
  • Sits in the upper tier of a crowded tactical multi-asset group on cost and process clarity.
  • MPRO The macro playbook in one ticker: the index sorts the cycle into expansion, peak, contraction or trough, then sets the bond/stock split and picks five of the eleven GICS sectors.sec.gov
  • Guardrails are written down, not improvised: 6 to 9 holdings, stocks and bonds each held between 15% and 75%, and up to 10% in alternatives such as gold or currency ETFs.sec.gov
  • Running since 2021 and now a fund in the hundreds of millions, with Kingsview building the index and Penserra on the trading desk. Distributions come quarterly.sec.gov

Worth knowing

  • GMOD New in 2025 and lightly traded so far, which can mean wider bid-ask spreads than the big allocation ETFs.
  • It owns other GMO funds, and the single 0.50% rate leans on a contractual waiver with an expiration date rather than a permanent cap.sec.gov
  • Cheaper tactical allocators exist (ENDW at 0.22%, ONOF at 0.39%), though each runs a different process.
  • MPRO At 1.03% it sits above the typical fee in its tactical multi-asset category, and above rules-based peers like ENDW at 0.22% or GMOD at 0.50% net of a waiver through June 30, 2027.
  • The equity sleeve owns five of eleven sectors at a time, so when the cycle call changes the portfolio reshuffles and sector bets can run well off the broad market.sec.gov
  • It buys other ETFs, so those funds' own expenses ride underneath, and shares trade lightly enough that the bid/ask gap is worth checking.sec.gov

Full GMOD profile⁠

Full MPRO profile⁠

GMOD vs MPRO Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

GMOD vs MPRO Cost

Overpaying MPRO vs GMOD

$9,194

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • GMOD 0.50%

    $9,979

  • MPRO 1.03%

    $19,173

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • GMOD 0.50%
  • MPRO 1.03%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530MPRO $19,173GMOD $9,979

Year by year

YearGMODMPROOverpaying
10$900$1,814$914
20$3,460$6,807$3,347
30$9,979$19,173$9,194

Expense ratio

  • 0.50%GMOD, cheaper
  • 1.03%MPRO
  • Middle half of Tactical Allocation funds
  • Median 0.93%

GMOD 6th cheapest of 46 funds

MPRO 33rd cheapest of 46 funds

GMOD vs MPRO Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
GMOD No data
MPRO 1.80%
Payout (12M)
GMOD No data
MPRO $0.60
Last payment
GMOD $0.14
MPRO $0.16
Ex-dividend
GMOD Jun 30, 2026
MPRO Sep 24, 2026
Paid on
GMOD Jul 1, 2026
MPRO Sep 29, 2026
Frequency
GMOD Twice a year
MPRO Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2021 to 2026, same scale for both

GMODTwice a year · 2 paymentsAll GMOD payments⁠
One bar per payment. 2 payments from 2021 to 2026 YTD. Dec 30, 2025 $0.24; Jun 30, 2026 $0.14. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.2520232026YTD
MPROQuarterly · 22 paymentsAll MPRO payments⁠
One bar per payment. 22 payments from 2021 to 2026 YTD. Jun 25, 2021 $0.02; Sep 24, 2021 $0.07; Dec 20, 2021 $0.17; Mar 25, 2022 $0.04; Jun 24, 2022 $0.09; Sep 23, 2022 $0.05; Dec 20, 2022 $0.08; Mar 24, 2023 $0.04; Jun 23, 2023 $0.18; Sep 22, 2023 $0.06; Dec 20, 2023 $0.09; Mar 27, 2024 $0.07; Jun 27, 2024 $0.12; Sep 26, 2024 $0.14; Dec 19, 2024 $0.15; Mar 27, 2025 $0.08; Jun 27, 2025 $0.12; Sep 26, 2025 $0.19; Dec 18, 2025 $0.20; Mar 26, 2026 $0.09; Jun 25, 2026 $0.14; Sep 24, 2026 $0.16. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.2520232026YTD

GMOD vs MPRO Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
GMOD 8.7%since Nov 2025MPRO 9.0%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
GMOD 0.89since Nov 2025MPRO 0.93
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
GMOD −6.5%since Oct 2025MPRO −14.5%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
GMOD 0.48MPRO 0.87

Popular comparisons

  • GMODAvsENDWA

    GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF · Cambria Endowment Style ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.22%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • MPROCvsENDWA

    Monarch ProCap ETF · Cambria Endowment Style ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.03% · 0.22%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GMODAvsPTBDA

    GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF · Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • MPROCvsPTBDA

    Monarch ProCap ETF · Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.03% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GMODAvsRISNA

    GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF · Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.72%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • MPROCvsRISNA

    Monarch ProCap ETF · Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.03% · 0.72%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.