PTBD ranks 3rd and MPRO 29th of 46 funds in the Tactical Allocation Category.
MPRO vs PTBD
PTBD −0.43pt a year
1.03%0.60%
MPRO 1.3×the volume
23.3K18.6K
MPRO +7.5pt
+5.9%−1.6%
MPRO vs PTBD Performance
+33.3%−7.9%
- MPRO 1.03%
- PTBD 0.60%, better
- MPRO $253M
- PTBD $83M
- MPRO +12.0%, better
- PTBD −0.1%
- MPRO 1.80%
- PTBD 6.36%, better
- MPRO 7
- PTBD 1047
- MPRO 23.3K sh, better
- PTBD 18.6K sh
- MPRO $32.93
- PTBD $18.34
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | MPRO | PTBD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D27 | A83Higher |
| Mission | D35 | |
| Risk | A76Higher | B60 |
| Tradability | A79Higher | C50 |
| Holdings | D37 | A90Higher |
| Durability | A78 | A83Higher |
Rank among Tactical Allocation funds
Same Category. MPRO and PTBD are both graded against the same 46 Tactical Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
MPROC
PTBDA
In short
MPRO MPRO reads employment data to place the economy in one of four cycle phases, then rotates a 6-to-9 ETF portfolio across bonds, five stock sectors and a dash of gold. Rules-based macro allocation in one ticker, at 1.03% with no waiver.
PTBD Trend following, pointed at bonds instead of stocks. A published rulebook shifts PTBD between high yield corporates and intermediate Treasuries as their relative strength changes, dialing credit risk up or down by formula rather than by opinion.
Stated mandate
MPRO The Fund seeks to replicate, before fees and expenses, the performance of the Monarch ProCap Index. It uses a replication-indexing strategy to pursue that objective.
PTBD The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the Pacer Trendpilot US Bond Index through a rules-based strategy that alternates between high-yield corporate bonds and U.S. Treasury bonds.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
MPRO vs PTBD Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
MPRO vs PTBD Cost
Overpaying MPRO vs PTBD
$7,356
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
MPRO 1.03%
$19,173
PTBD 0.60%
$11,817
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | MPRO | PTBD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,814 | $1,076 | $738 |
| 20 | $6,807 | $4,116 | $2,691 |
| 30 | $19,173 | $11,817 | $7,356 |
- 1.03%MPRO
- 0.60%PTBD, cheaper
- Middle half of Tactical Allocation funds
- Median 0.93%
PTBD 8th cheapest of 46 funds
MPRO 33rd cheapest of 46 funds
MPRO vs PTBD Dividends
- MPRO 1.80%
- PTBD 6.36%, better
- MPRO $0.60
- PTBD $1.17
- MPRO $0.16
- PTBD $0.10
- MPRO Sep 24, 2026
- PTBD Oct 22, 2026
- MPRO Sep 29, 2026
- PTBD Oct 26, 2026
- MPRO Quarterly
- PTBD Monthly
Distribution history
MPRO vs PTBD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- MPRO
- PTBD
Risk facts
- Volatility
- MPRO 9.0%PTBD 5.2%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- MPRO 0.93, betterPTBD 0.08
- Worst fall
- MPRO −14.5%, betterPTBD −24.8%
- Market sensitivity
- MPRO 0.87PTBD 0.74
Popular comparisons
- 1.03% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.03% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.03% · 0.72%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.72%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.