EWC ranks 1st and ENOR 34th of 38 funds in the Developed Single Country Category.
ENOR vs EWC
EWC −0.03pt a year
0.53%0.50%
EWC 16.3×the volume
103K1.68M
EWC +1.6pt
+9.8%+11.4%
ENOR vs EWC Performance
+53.8%+71.2%
- ENOR 0.53%
- EWC 0.50%, better
- ENOR $347M
- EWC $7.58B
- ENOR +44.0%, better
- EWC +21.1%
- ENOR 4.89%, better
- EWC 1.24%
- ENOR 62
- EWC 83
- ENOR 103K sh
- EWC 1.68M sh, better
- ENOR $37.87
- EWC $60.62
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ENOR | EWC |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D30 | B55Higher |
| Mission | F12 | A90Higher |
| Risk | B62 | A87Higher |
| Tradability | C41 | A97Higher |
| Holdings | B56 | A78Higher |
| Durability | B61 | A80Higher |
Rank among Developed Single Country funds
Same Category. ENOR and EWC are both graded against the same 38 Developed Single Country funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ENORD
EWCA
In short
ENOR One ticker for Norway's listed market, large caps down to small. The index reaches roughly 99% of the country's investable stocks and applies caps that stop any single giant from swallowing the fund.
EWC A 1996 original: Canada's large and mid caps in one ticker, back when single-country funds were still a novelty. About 80 names, held through a capped MSCI index built so one giant can't swamp the basket.
Stated mandate
ENOR The fund seeks to track an index composed of Norwegian equities and provides targeted, single-country exposure to companies in Norway.
EWC The fund seeks to track an index representing Canadian equities, providing exposure to large- and mid-sized companies in Canada.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ENOR vs EWC Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ENOR vs EWC Cost
Overpaying ENOR vs EWC
$557
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ENOR 0.53%
$10,536
EWC 0.50%
$9,979
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ENOR | EWC | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $953 | $900 | $53 |
| 20 | $3,658 | $3,460 | $198 |
| 30 | $10,536 | $9,979 | $557 |
- 0.53%ENOR
- 0.50%EWC, cheaper
- Middle half of Developed Single Country funds
- Median 0.50%
EWC 14th cheapest of 38 funds
ENOR 26th cheapest of 38 funds
ENOR vs EWC Dividends
- ENOR 4.89%, better
- EWC 1.24%
- ENOR $1.84
- EWC $0.75
- ENOR $1.56
- EWC $0.28
- ENOR Jun 15, 2026
- EWC Jun 15, 2026
- ENOR Jun 18, 2026
- EWC Jun 18, 2026
- ENOR Twice a year
- EWC Twice a year
Distribution history
ENOR vs EWC Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- ENOR
- EWC
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ENOR 18.5%EWC 13.1%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- ENOR 1.07EWC 1.54, better
- Worst fall
- ENOR −32.6%EWC −24.8%, better
- Market sensitivity
- ENOR 0.50EWC 0.88
ENOR and EWC in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.53% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.53% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.53% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





