EWM ranks 4th and EZA 5th of 21 funds in the Emerging Markets Single Country Category.
EWM vs EZA
EWM −0.09pt a year
0.50%0.59%
EWM 1.3×the volume
214K164K
EZA +4.5pt
+2.4%+6.9%
EWM vs EZA Performance
+23.7%+65.5%
- EWM 0.50%, better
- EZA 0.59%
- EWM $230M
- EZA $439M
- EWM +7.8%, better
- EZA +4.4%
- EWM 3.71%
- EZA 8.17%, better
- EWM 25
- EZA 31
- EWM 214K sh, better
- EZA 164K sh
- EWM $26.87
- EZA $61.80
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EWM | EZA |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A88Higher | C50 |
| Mission | C43 | B69Higher |
| Risk | A78Higher | C40 |
| Tradability | B55 | A80Higher |
| Holdings | C41 | A76Higher |
| Durability | B56 | A71Higher |
Rank among Emerging Markets Single Country funds
Same Category. EWM and EZA are both graded against the same 21 Emerging Markets Single Country funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EWMB
EZAB
In short
EWM Malaysia in one ticker, running since 1996. EWM tracks the MSCI Malaysia index, a cap-weighted slice of Kuala Lumpur's largest listed companies, and charges less than the typical single-country emerging markets fund.
EZA Since 2003, the plain US-listed way to own the Johannesburg market: about 27 large and mid-cap South African stocks, with index caps keeping any one corporate group from taking over the portfolio.
Stated mandate
EWM The fund seeks to track an index composed of Malaysian equities.
EZA The fund seeks to track an index made up of South African equities.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EWM vs EZA Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EWM vs EZA Cost
Overpaying EZA vs EWM
$1,656
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EWM 0.50%
$9,979
EZA 0.59%
$11,635
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EWM | EZA | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $900 | $1,058 | $158 |
| 20 | $3,460 | $4,051 | $591 |
| 30 | $9,979 | $11,635 | $1,656 |
- 0.50%EWM, cheaper
- 0.59%EZA
- Middle half of Emerging Markets Single Country funds
- Median 0.59%
EWM 3rd cheapest of 21 funds
EZA 7th cheapest of 21 funds
EWM vs EZA Dividends
- EWM 3.71%
- EZA 8.17%, better
- EWM $1.00
- EZA $5.05
- EWM $0.57
- EZA $1.43
- EWM Jun 15, 2026
- EZA Jun 15, 2026
- EWM Jun 18, 2026
- EZA Jun 22, 2026
- EWM Twice a year
- EZA Twice a year
Distribution history
EWM vs EZA Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- EWM
- EZA
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EWM 13.0%, betterEZA 22.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- EWM 0.68EZA 0.92, better
- Worst fall
- EWM −22.2%, betterEZA −34.9%
- Market sensitivity
- EWM 0.46EZA 1.12
Popular comparisons
- 0.50% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.