EWW ranks 1st and EZA 5th of 21 funds in the Emerging Markets Single Country Category.
EWW vs EZA
EWW −0.09pt a year
0.50%0.59%
EWW 7.1×the volume
1.16M164K
EZA +0.2pt
+6.7%+6.9%
EWW vs EZA Performance
+81.4%+65.5%
- EWW 0.50%, better
- EZA 0.59%
- EWW $1.56B
- EZA $439M
- EWW +15.8%, better
- EZA +4.4%
- EWW 3.31%
- EZA 8.17%, better
- EWW 42
- EZA 31
- EWW 1.16M sh, better
- EZA 164K sh
- EWW $74.42
- EZA $61.80
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EWW | EZA |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A88Higher | C50 |
| Mission | B67 | B69Higher |
| Risk | B55Higher | C40 |
| Tradability | A100Higher | A80 |
| Holdings | B61 | A76Higher |
| Durability | A81Higher | A71 |
Rank among Emerging Markets Single Country funds
Same Category. EWW and EZA are both graded against the same 21 Emerging Markets Single Country funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EWWA
EZAB
In short
EWW Mexico in one ticker, doing that job since 1996. Roughly 40 of the country's biggest listed names, capped so no single company runs the show, for 0.50% a year.
EZA Since 2003, the plain US-listed way to own the Johannesburg market: about 27 large and mid-cap South African stocks, with index caps keeping any one corporate group from taking over the portfolio.
Stated mandate
EWW The fund seeks to track an index composed of Mexican equities and provides targeted exposure to companies in Mexico.
EZA The fund seeks to track an index made up of South African equities.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EWW vs EZA Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EWW vs EZA Cost
Overpaying EZA vs EWW
$1,656
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EWW 0.50%
$9,979
EZA 0.59%
$11,635
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EWW | EZA | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $900 | $1,058 | $158 |
| 20 | $3,460 | $4,051 | $591 |
| 30 | $9,979 | $11,635 | $1,656 |
- 0.50%EWW, cheaper
- 0.59%EZA
- Middle half of Emerging Markets Single Country funds
- Median 0.59%
EWW 3rd cheapest of 21 funds
EZA 7th cheapest of 21 funds
EWW vs EZA Dividends
- EWW 3.31%
- EZA 8.17%, better
- EWW $2.46
- EZA $5.05
- EWW $1.14
- EZA $1.43
- EWW Jun 15, 2026
- EZA Jun 15, 2026
- EWW Jun 18, 2026
- EZA Jun 22, 2026
- EWW Twice a year
- EZA Twice a year
Distribution history
EWW vs EZA Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- EWW
- EZA
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EWW 20.1%, betterEZA 22.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- EWW 0.56EZA 0.92, better
- Worst fall
- EWW −31.2%, betterEZA −34.9%
- Market sensitivity
- EWW 1.06EZA 1.12
Popular comparisons
- 0.50% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.