EWM ranks 3rd and EPU 9th of 21 funds in the Emerging Markets Single Country Category.
EPU vs EWM
EWM −0.09pt a year
0.59%0.50%
EWM 5.8×the volume
36.8K214K
EPU +10.8pt
+13.3%+2.5%
EPU vs EWM Performance
+238.4%+26.3%
- EPU 0.59%
- EWM 0.50%, better
- EPU $496M
- EWM $230M
- EPU +32.1%, better
- EWM +8.2%
- EPU 2.10%
- EWM 3.70%, better
- EPU 33
- EWM 25
- EPU 36.8K sh
- EWM 214K sh, better
- EPU $80.70
- EWM $26.87
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EPU | EWM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C50 | A88Higher |
| Mission | B63Higher | C43 |
| Risk | B60 | A78Higher |
| Tradability | C43 | B55Higher |
| Holdings | F15 | C41Higher |
| Durability | A72Higher | B56 |
Rank among Emerging Markets Single Country funds
Same Category. EPU and EWM are both graded against the same 21 Emerging Markets Single Country funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EPUC
EWMB
In short
EPU Peru in one ticker. iShares has run this since 2009, tracking a capped MSCI Peru index that holds only about two dozen names, and the fund's own title flags exposure reaching beyond Lima-listed shares.
EWM Malaysia in one ticker, running since 1996. EWM tracks the MSCI Malaysia index, a cap-weighted slice of Kuala Lumpur's largest listed companies, and charges less than the typical single-country emerging markets fund.
Stated mandate
EPU The Fund seeks to track an equity index with exposure to Peru, specifically the MSCI All Peru Capped Index.
EWM The fund seeks to track an index composed of Malaysian equities.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EPU vs EWM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EPU vs EWM Cost
Overpaying EPU vs EWM
$1,656
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EPU 0.59%
$11,635
EWM 0.50%
$9,979
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EPU | EWM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,058 | $900 | $158 |
| 20 | $4,051 | $3,460 | $591 |
| 30 | $11,635 | $9,979 | $1,656 |
- 0.59%EPU
- 0.50%EWM, cheaper
- Middle half of Emerging Markets Single Country funds
- Median 0.59%
EWM 3rd cheapest of 21 funds
EPU 7th cheapest of 21 funds
EPU vs EWM Dividends
- EPU 2.10%
- EWM 3.70%, better
- EPU $1.71
- EWM $1.00
- EPU $1.42
- EWM $0.57
- EPU Jun 15, 2026
- EWM Jun 15, 2026
- EPU Jun 18, 2026
- EWM Jun 18, 2026
- EPU Twice a year
- EWM Twice a year
Distribution history
EPU vs EWM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- EPU
- EWM
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EPU 23.8%EWM 13.0%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- EPU 1.55, betterEWM 0.68
- Worst fall
- EPU −35.5%EWM −22.2%, better
- Market sensitivity
- EPU 1.13EWM 0.46
Popular comparisons
- 0.59% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.