EWW ranks 1st and EPU 9th of 21 funds in the Emerging Markets Single Country Category.
EPU vs EWW
EWW −0.09pt a year
0.59%0.50%
EWW 31.6×the volume
36.8K1.16M
EPU +6.0pt
+13.3%+7.3%
EPU vs EWW Performance
+238.4%+86.1%
- EPU 0.59%
- EWW 0.50%, better
- EPU $496M
- EWW $1.56B
- EPU +32.1%, better
- EWW +18.0%
- EPU 2.10%
- EWW 3.25%, better
- EPU 33
- EWW 42
- EPU 36.8K sh
- EWW 1.16M sh, better
- EPU $80.70
- EWW $74.42
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EPU | EWW |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C50 | A88Higher |
| Mission | B63 | B67Higher |
| Risk | B60Higher | B55 |
| Tradability | C43 | A100Higher |
| Holdings | F15 | B61Higher |
| Durability | A72 | A81Higher |
Rank among Emerging Markets Single Country funds
Same Category. EPU and EWW are both graded against the same 21 Emerging Markets Single Country funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EPUC
EWWA
In short
EPU Peru in one ticker. iShares has run this since 2009, tracking a capped MSCI Peru index that holds only about two dozen names, and the fund's own title flags exposure reaching beyond Lima-listed shares.
EWW Mexico in one ticker, doing that job since 1996. Roughly 40 of the country's biggest listed names, capped so no single company runs the show, for 0.50% a year.
Stated mandate
EPU The Fund seeks to track an equity index with exposure to Peru, specifically the MSCI All Peru Capped Index.
EWW The fund seeks to track an index composed of Mexican equities and provides targeted exposure to companies in Mexico.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EPU vs EWW Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EPU vs EWW Cost
Overpaying EPU vs EWW
$1,656
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EPU 0.59%
$11,635
EWW 0.50%
$9,979
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EPU | EWW | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,058 | $900 | $158 |
| 20 | $4,051 | $3,460 | $591 |
| 30 | $11,635 | $9,979 | $1,656 |
- 0.59%EPU
- 0.50%EWW, cheaper
- Middle half of Emerging Markets Single Country funds
- Median 0.59%
EWW 3rd cheapest of 21 funds
EPU 7th cheapest of 21 funds
EPU vs EWW Dividends
- EPU 2.10%
- EWW 3.25%, better
- EPU $1.71
- EWW $2.46
- EPU $1.42
- EWW $1.14
- EPU Jun 15, 2026
- EWW Jun 15, 2026
- EPU Jun 18, 2026
- EWW Jun 18, 2026
- EPU Twice a year
- EWW Twice a year
Distribution history
EPU vs EWW Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- EPU
- EWW
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EPU 23.8%EWW 20.1%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- EPU 1.55, betterEWW 0.56
- Worst fall
- EPU −35.5%EWW −31.2%, better
- Market sensitivity
- EPU 1.13EWW 1.06
Popular comparisons
- 0.59% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.