FAS ranks 3rd and EURL 22nd of 30 funds in the 3x Leveraged Long Category.
EURL vs FAS
FAS −0.16pt a year
1.04%0.88%
FAS 27.5×the volume
15K413K
FAS +10.8pt
+10.1%+20.9%
EURL vs FAS Performance
+23.6%+31.4%
- EURL 1.04%
- FAS 0.88%, better
- EURL $41M
- FAS $2.17B
- EURL +17.7%, better
- FAS +12.3%
- EURL 1.98%
- FAS 8.87%, better
- EURL 9
- FAS 87
- EURL 15K sh
- FAS 413K sh, better
- EURL $43.57
- FAS $168.18
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EURL | FAS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F20 | A92Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B69 | B69 |
| Tradability | D30 | A73Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | C44 | B66Higher |
Rank among 3x Leveraged Long funds
Same Category. EURL and FAS are both graded against the same 30 3x Leveraged Long funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EURLD
FASA
In short
EURL Most 3x bull funds point at US indexes and sectors. EURL aims the same machinery at Europe, seeking 300% of the FTSE Developed Europe All Cap Index's move for one day at a time, at 1.04% net of a waiver through September 1, 2027.
FAS Born in November 2008 with the banking system on fire, FAS aims to deliver three times the daily move of the Financial Select Sector Index. A one-day tool on roughly 80 financial stocks, built around a single-day objective.
Stated mandate
EURL The fund seeks a daily return equal to 300% of the FTSE Developed Europe All Cap Index's performance, before fees and expenses. Its objective applies to a single day rather than longer cumulative periods.
FAS The fund seeks a daily return equal to three times the performance of the Financial Select Sector Index, before fees and expenses. It is designed for a single-day objective rather than a multiple of the index’s cumulative return over longer periods.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EURL vs FAS Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EURL vs FAS Cost
Overpaying EURL vs FAS
$2,629
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EURL 1.04%
$19,334
FAS 0.88%
$16,705
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EURL | FAS | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,831 | $1,559 | $272 |
| 20 | $6,867 | $5,891 | $976 |
| 30 | $19,334 | $16,705 | $2,629 |
- 1.04%EURL
- 0.88%FAS, cheaper
- Middle half of 3x Leveraged Long funds
- Median 0.96%
FAS 4th cheapest of 30 funds
EURL 24th cheapest of 30 funds
EURL vs FAS Dividends
- EURL 1.98%
- FAS 8.87%, better
- EURL $0.84
- FAS $14.62
- EURL $0.15
- FAS $1.00
- EURL Sep 22, 2026
- FAS Sep 22, 2026
- EURL Sep 29, 2026
- FAS Sep 29, 2026
- EURL Quarterly
- FAS Quarterly
Distribution history
EURL vs FAS Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- EURL
- FAS
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EURL 39.3%, betterFAS 46.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- EURL 0.98FAS 1.03, better
- Worst fall
- EURL −74.7%FAS −66.9%, better
- Market sensitivity
- EURL 2.02FAS 2.63
Popular comparisons
- 1.04% · 0.78%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.88% · 0.78%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.04% · 0.94%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.88% · 0.94%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.04% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.88% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.