EWC ranks 1st and ISRA 31st of 38 funds in the Developed Single Country Category.
EWC vs ISRA
EWC −0.09pt a year
0.50%0.59%
EWC 434.4×the volume
1.68M3.88K
EWC +0.9pt
+11.4%+10.5%
EWC vs ISRA Performance
+71.2%+36.7%
- EWC 0.50%, better
- ISRA 0.59%
- EWC $7.58B
- ISRA $152M
- EWC +21.1%, better
- ISRA +17.2%
- EWC 1.24%
- ISRA 1.36%, better
- EWC 83
- ISRA 82
- EWC 1.68M sh, better
- ISRA 3.88K sh
- EWC $60.62
- ISRA $63.93
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EWC | ISRA |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B55Higher | F18 |
| Mission | A90Higher | C47 |
| Risk | A87Higher | C52 |
| Tradability | A97Higher | D39 |
| Holdings | A78Higher | A72 |
| Durability | A80Higher | B55 |
Rank among Developed Single Country funds
Same Category. EWC and ISRA are both graded against the same 38 Developed Single Country funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EWCA
ISRAC
In short
EWC A 1996 original: Canada's large and mid caps in one ticker, back when single-country funds were still a novelty. About 80 names, held through a capped MSCI index built so one giant can't swamp the basket.
ISRA One ticker for Israel. ISRA tracks the BlueStar Israel Global Index, a benchmark built around companies generally considered Israeli rather than an Israel sleeve carved out of a world index, and it has been running since 2013.
Stated mandate
EWC The fund seeks to track an index representing Canadian equities, providing exposure to large- and mid-sized companies in Canada.
ISRA The fund seeks to replicate, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the BlueStar Israel Global Index, which represents equity securities of companies generally considered Israeli.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EWC vs ISRA Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EWC vs ISRA Cost
Overpaying ISRA vs EWC
$1,656
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EWC 0.50%
$9,979
ISRA 0.59%
$11,635
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EWC | ISRA | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $900 | $1,058 | $158 |
| 20 | $3,460 | $4,051 | $591 |
| 30 | $9,979 | $11,635 | $1,656 |
- 0.50%EWC, cheaper
- 0.59%ISRA
- Middle half of Developed Single Country funds
- Median 0.50%
EWC 14th cheapest of 38 funds
ISRA 29th cheapest of 38 funds
EWC vs ISRA Dividends
- EWC 1.24%
- ISRA 1.36%, better
- EWC $0.75
- ISRA $0.87
- EWC $0.28
- ISRA $0.87
- EWC Jun 15, 2026
- ISRA Dec 22, 2025
- EWC Jun 18, 2026
- ISRA Dec 26, 2025
- EWC Twice a year
- ISRA Annual
Distribution history
EWC vs ISRA Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- EWC
- ISRA
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EWC 13.1%, betterISRA 17.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- EWC 1.54, betterISRA 1.47
- Worst fall
- EWC −24.8%, betterISRA −45.0%
- Market sensitivity
- EWC 0.88ISRA 1.04
EWC and ISRA in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.50% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





