EWC ranks 1st and NORW 27th of 38 funds in the Developed Single Country Category.
EWC vs NORW
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
0.50%0.50%
EWC 57.8×the volume
1.68M29.1K
EWC +2.1pt
+11.4%+9.3%
EWC vs NORW Performance
+71.2%+53.2%
- EWC 0.50%
- NORW 0.50%
- EWC $7.58B
- NORW $96M
- EWC +21.1%
- NORW +44.0%, better
- EWC 1.24%
- NORW 6.61%, better
- EWC 83
- NORW 61
- EWC 1.68M sh, better
- NORW 29.1K sh
- EWC $60.62
- NORW $38.37
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EWC | NORW |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B55 | B55 |
| Mission | A90Higher | F14 |
| Risk | A87Higher | B62 |
| Tradability | A97Higher | C47 |
| Holdings | A78Higher | B60 |
| Durability | A80Higher | D39 |
Rank among Developed Single Country funds
Same Category. EWC and NORW are both graded against the same 38 Developed Single Country funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EWCA
NORWC
In short
EWC A 1996 original: Canada's large and mid caps in one ticker, back when single-country funds were still a novelty. About 80 names, held through a capped MSCI index built so one giant can't swamp the basket.
NORW Norway in one ticker: not a skim of the blue chips, but the large, mid and small caps that make up nearly all of Oslo's investable market, with index caps that keep any single giant from taking over.
Stated mandate
EWC The fund seeks to track an index representing Canadian equities, providing exposure to large- and mid-sized companies in Canada.
NORW NORW seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the MSCI Norway IMI 25/50 Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EWC vs NORW Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EWC vs NORW Cost
Same expense ratio
$9,979
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EWC 0.50%
$9,979
NORW 0.50%
$9,979
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EWC | NORW |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | $900 | $900 |
| 20 | $3,460 | $3,460 |
| 30 | $9,979 | $9,979 |
- 0.50%EWC
- 0.50%NORW
- Middle half of Developed Single Country funds
- Median 0.50%
EWC 14th cheapest of 38 funds
NORW 14th cheapest of 38 funds
EWC vs NORW Dividends
- EWC 1.24%
- NORW 6.61%, better
- EWC $0.75
- NORW $2.53
- EWC $0.28
- NORW $2.10
- EWC Jun 15, 2026
- NORW Jun 29, 2026
- EWC Jun 18, 2026
- NORW Jul 7, 2026
- EWC Twice a year
- NORW Twice a year
Distribution history
EWC vs NORW Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- EWC
- NORW
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EWC 13.1%, betterNORW 18.4%
- Return per unit of risk
- EWC 1.54, betterNORW 1.07
- Worst fall
- EWC −24.8%, betterNORW −32.7%
- Market sensitivity
- EWC 0.88NORW 0.46
EWC and NORW in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.50% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





