FLGB ranks 3rd and NORW 27th of 38 funds in the Developed Single Country Category.
FLGB vs NORW
FLGB −0.41pt a year
0.09%0.50%
FLGB 3.6×the volume
106K29.1K
FLGB +2.8pt
+11.7%+8.9%
FLGB vs NORW Performance
+74.3%+53.2%
- FLGB 0.09%, better
- NORW 0.50%
- FLGB $878M
- NORW $96M
- FLGB +15.9%
- NORW +44.0%, better
- FLGB 2.87%
- NORW 6.61%, better
- FLGB 89
- NORW 61
- FLGB 106K sh, better
- NORW 29.1K sh
- FLGB $36.82
- NORW $38.37
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FLGB | NORW |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A93Higher | B55 |
| Mission | A73Higher | F14 |
| Risk | A73Higher | B62 |
| Tradability | B62Higher | C47 |
| Holdings | A72Higher | B60 |
| Durability | C53Higher | D39 |
Rank among Developed Single Country funds
Same Category. FLGB and NORW are both graded against the same 38 Developed Single Country funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FLGBA
NORWC
In short
FLGB Britain in one ticker for nine basis points. Franklin's UK tracker follows a capped FTSE index of roughly 110 British companies and charges a small fraction of what the typical index fund in its peer group costs.
NORW Norway in one ticker: not a skim of the blue chips, but the large, mid and small caps that make up nearly all of Oslo's investable market, with index caps that keep any single giant from taking over.
Stated mandate
FLGB The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the performance of the FTSE UK RIC Capped Index.
NORW NORW seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the MSCI Norway IMI 25/50 Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FLGB vs NORW Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FLGB vs NORW Cost
Overpaying NORW vs FLGB
$8,081
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FLGB 0.09%
$1,898
NORW 0.50%
$9,979
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FLGB | NORW | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $165 | $900 | $735 |
| 20 | $646 | $3,460 | $2,814 |
| 30 | $1,898 | $9,979 | $8,081 |
- 0.09%FLGB, cheaper
- 0.50%NORW
- Middle half of Developed Single Country funds
- Median 0.50%
FLGB cheapest of 38 funds
NORW 14th cheapest of 38 funds
FLGB vs NORW Dividends
- FLGB 2.87%
- NORW 6.61%, better
- FLGB $1.06
- NORW $2.53
- FLGB $0.47
- NORW $2.10
- FLGB Jun 26, 2026
- NORW Jun 29, 2026
- FLGB Jul 6, 2026
- NORW Jul 7, 2026
- FLGB Twice a year
- NORW Twice a year
Distribution history
FLGB vs NORW Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FLGB
- NORW
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FLGB 11.0%, betterNORW 18.4%
- Return per unit of risk
- FLGB 1.44, betterNORW 1.07
- Worst fall
- FLGB −25.9%, betterNORW −32.7%
- Market sensitivity
- FLGB 0.75NORW 0.46
FLGB and NORW in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.09% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.



