FLKR ranks 15th and EWH 19th of 38 funds in the Developed Single Country Category.
EWH vs FLKR
FLKR −0.41pt a year
0.50%0.09%
EWH 3.5×the volume
2.9M830K
FLKR +14.0pt
+2.1%+16.1%
EWH vs FLKR Performance
+11.2%+110.9%
- EWH 0.50%
- FLKR 0.09%, better
- EWH $1.24B
- FLKR $1.79B
- EWH +9.7%
- FLKR +62.5%, better
- EWH 4.60%, better
- FLKR 2.92%
- EWH 30
- FLKR 148
- EWH 2.9M sh, better
- FLKR 830K sh
- EWH $22.34
- FLKR $51.47
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EWH | FLKR |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B55 | A93Higher |
| Mission | C48 | B57Higher |
| Risk | D36Higher | D25 |
| Tradability | A82Higher | C49 |
| Holdings | D32 | C50Higher |
| Durability | A71Higher | B60 |
Rank among Developed Single Country funds
Same Category. EWH and FLKR are both graded against the same 38 Developed Single Country funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EWHC
FLKRB
In short
EWH Hong Kong in a single US ticker, listed back in 1996. Roughly two dozen large Hong Kong companies tracking MSCI's Hong Kong 25-50 index, from the first generation of single-country funds.
FLKR Korea in one passive basket for 0.09% a year, a fraction of the 0.50% typical single-country fee. Roughly 160 Korean names tracking a capped FTSE index, run as plain index plumbing rather than a stock-picking bet.
Stated mandate
EWH The fund seeks to track an index of Hong Kong equities, providing targeted exposure to companies in Hong Kong.
FLKR The Fund uses a passive indexing approach to seek returns that closely correspond, before fees and expenses, to the FTSE South Korea Capped Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EWH vs FLKR Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EWH vs FLKR Cost
Overpaying EWH vs FLKR
$8,081
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EWH 0.50%
$9,979
FLKR 0.09%
$1,898
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EWH | FLKR | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $900 | $165 | $735 |
| 20 | $3,460 | $646 | $2,814 |
| 30 | $9,979 | $1,898 | $8,081 |
- 0.50%EWH
- 0.09%FLKR, cheaper
- Middle half of Developed Single Country funds
- Median 0.50%
FLKR cheapest of 38 funds
EWH 14th cheapest of 38 funds
EWH vs FLKR Dividends
- EWH 4.60%, better
- FLKR 2.92%
- EWH $1.04
- FLKR $1.47
- EWH $0.35
- FLKR $0.30
- EWH Jun 15, 2026
- FLKR Jun 26, 2026
- EWH Jun 18, 2026
- FLKR Jul 6, 2026
- EWH Twice a year
- FLKR Twice a year
Distribution history
EWH vs FLKR Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- EWH
- FLKR
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EWH 18.6%, betterFLKR 43.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- EWH 0.62FLKR 0.97, better
- Worst fall
- EWH −36.3%, betterFLKR −41.3%
- Market sensitivity
- EWH 0.71FLKR 2.57
EWH and FLKR in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.50% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





