FLMX ranks 2nd and EZA 5th of 21 funds in the Emerging Markets Single Country Category.
EZA vs FLMX
FLMX −0.40pt a year
0.59%0.19%
EZA 16.1×the volume
164K10.2K
FLMX +1.9pt
+10.6%+12.5%
EZA vs FLMX Performance
+65.5%+80.3%
- EZA 0.59%
- FLMX 0.19%, better
- EZA $439M
- FLMX $82M
- EZA +4.4%
- FLMX +16.3%, better
- EZA 8.17%, better
- FLMX 3.91%
- EZA 31
- FLMX 39
- EZA 164K sh, better
- FLMX 10.2K sh
- EZA $61.80
- FLMX $36.31
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EZA | FLMX |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C50 | A100Higher |
| Mission | B69Higher | B65 |
| Risk | C40 | C54Higher |
| Tradability | A80Higher | C48 |
| Holdings | A76Higher | B64 |
| Durability | A71Higher | D37 |
Rank among Emerging Markets Single Country funds
Same Category. EZA and FLMX are both graded against the same 21 Emerging Markets Single Country funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EZAB
FLMXB
In short
EZA Since 2003, the plain US-listed way to own the Johannesburg market: about 27 large and mid-cap South African stocks, with index caps keeping any one corporate group from taking over the portfolio.
FLMX Mexico exposure at a discount. Franklin's tracker charges 0.19%, a fraction of what single-country emerging-market funds usually cost, and holds a compact basket of the country's largest listed companies.
Stated mandate
EZA The fund seeks to track an index made up of South African equities.
FLMX The Fund seeks to track the performance of the FTSE Mexico Capped Index before fees and expenses through an indexing strategy, investing at least 80% of assets in index components or related exposure.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EZA vs FLMX Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EZA vs FLMX Cost
Overpaying EZA vs FLMX
$7,683
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EZA 0.59%
$11,635
FLMX 0.19%
$3,952
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EZA | FLMX | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,058 | $347 | $711 |
| 20 | $4,051 | $1,351 | $2,700 |
| 30 | $11,635 | $3,952 | $7,683 |
- 0.59%EZA
- 0.19%FLMX, cheaper
- Middle half of Emerging Markets Single Country funds
- Median 0.59%
FLMX cheapest of 21 funds
EZA 7th cheapest of 21 funds
EZA vs FLMX Dividends
- EZA 8.17%, better
- FLMX 3.91%
- EZA $5.05
- FLMX $1.42
- EZA $1.43
- FLMX $0.72
- EZA Jun 15, 2026
- FLMX Jun 26, 2026
- EZA Jun 22, 2026
- FLMX Jul 6, 2026
- EZA Twice a year
- FLMX Twice a year
Distribution history
EZA vs FLMX Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- EZA
- FLMX
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EZA 22.2%FLMX 20.0%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- EZA 0.92, betterFLMX 0.55
- Worst fall
- EZA −34.9%FLMX −31.7%, better
- Market sensitivity
- EZA 1.12FLMX 1.08
Popular comparisons
- 0.59% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.