FLCA ranks 1st and EWP 10th of 38 funds in the Developed Single Country Category.
EWP vs FLCA
FLCA −0.41pt a year
0.50%0.09%
EWP 9.2×the volume
453K49K
EWP +6.8pt
+18.5%+11.7%
EWP vs FLCA Performance
+133.5%+73.7%
- EWP 0.50%
- FLCA 0.09%, better
- EWP $1.94B
- FLCA $857M
- EWP +15.7%
- FLCA +21.5%, better
- EWP 2.96%, better
- FLCA 1.70%
- EWP 25
- FLCA 92
- EWP 453K sh, better
- FLCA 49K sh
- EWP $56.31
- FLCA $54.21
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EWP | FLCA |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B55 | A93Higher |
| Mission | A79Higher | B65 |
| Risk | A70 | A87Higher |
| Tradability | B67 | B69Higher |
| Holdings | D34 | A81Higher |
| Durability | A75Higher | C53 |
Rank among Developed Single Country funds
Same Category. EWP and FLCA are both graded against the same 38 Developed Single Country funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EWPB
FLCAA
In short
EWP Spain in one ticker. Trading since 1996, back when single-country ETFs were a novelty, EWP still does one job: track an index of Spanish equities and hold a capped basket of the country's largest listed companies.
FLCA Canada in one ticker, at index-fund pricing. FLCA tracks the FTSE Canada Capped Index, about 50 large- and mid-cap Canadian names, for 0.09% a year.
Stated mandate
EWP The fund seeks to track an index composed of Spanish equities.
FLCA The fund seeks to track the FTSE Canada Capped Index, which measures the performance of Canadian large- and mid-capitalization stocks.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EWP vs FLCA Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EWP vs FLCA Cost
Overpaying EWP vs FLCA
$8,081
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EWP 0.50%
$9,979
FLCA 0.09%
$1,898
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EWP | FLCA | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $900 | $165 | $735 |
| 20 | $3,460 | $646 | $2,814 |
| 30 | $9,979 | $1,898 | $8,081 |
- 0.50%EWP
- 0.09%FLCA, cheaper
- Middle half of Developed Single Country funds
- Median 0.50%
FLCA cheapest of 38 funds
EWP 14th cheapest of 38 funds
EWP vs FLCA Dividends
- EWP 2.96%, better
- FLCA 1.70%
- EWP $1.66
- FLCA $0.92
- EWP $0.92
- FLCA $0.39
- EWP Jun 15, 2026
- FLCA Jun 26, 2026
- EWP Jun 18, 2026
- FLCA Jul 6, 2026
- EWP Twice a year
- FLCA Twice a year
Distribution history
EWP vs FLCA Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- EWP
- FLCA
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EWP 16.5%FLCA 13.1%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- EWP 1.54FLCA 1.54Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Worst fall
- EWP −30.2%FLCA −24.2%, better
- Market sensitivity
- EWP 0.86FLCA 0.81
Popular comparisons
- 0.50% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.


