BBCA ranks 4th and EWP 10th of 38 funds in the Developed Single Country Category.
BBCA vs EWP
BBCA −0.31pt a year
0.19%0.50%
EWP 1.4×the volume
330K453K
EWP +7.0pt
+11.5%+18.5%
BBCA vs EWP Performance
+72.5%+133.5%
- BBCA 0.19%, better
- EWP 0.50%
- BBCA $11.9B
- EWP $1.94B
- BBCA +22.1%, better
- EWP +15.7%
- BBCA 1.68%
- EWP 2.96%, better
- BBCA 78
- EWP 25
- BBCA 330K sh
- EWP 453K sh, better
- BBCA $104.51
- EWP $56.31
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BBCA | EWP |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A82Higher | B55 |
| Mission | B59 | A79Higher |
| Risk | A87Higher | A70 |
| Tradability | B55 | B67Higher |
| Holdings | A76Higher | D34 |
| Durability | B58 | A75Higher |
Rank among Developed Single Country funds
Same Category. BBCA and EWP are both graded against the same 38 Developed Single Country funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BBCAA
EWPB
In short
BBCA Canada, at a discount. BBCA tracks a Morningstar index of roughly 80 Canadian stocks for 0.19% a year, a fraction of what most single-country funds charge, and it has grown into a multi-billion-dollar fund since its 2018 launch.
EWP Spain in one ticker. Trading since 1996, back when single-country ETFs were a novelty, EWP still does one job: track an index of Spanish equities and hold a capped basket of the country's largest listed companies.
Stated mandate
BBCA The fund seeks to track the Morningstar Canada Target Market Exposure Index before fees and expenses. It uses a passive indexing approach to approximate the index rather than outperform it.
EWP The fund seeks to track an index composed of Spanish equities.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BBCA vs EWP Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BBCA vs EWP Cost
Overpaying EWP vs BBCA
$6,027
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BBCA 0.19%
$3,952
EWP 0.50%
$9,979
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BBCA | EWP | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $347 | $900 | $553 |
| 20 | $1,351 | $3,460 | $2,109 |
| 30 | $3,952 | $9,979 | $6,027 |
- 0.19%BBCA, cheaper
- 0.50%EWP
- Middle half of Developed Single Country funds
- Median 0.50%
BBCA 7th cheapest of 38 funds
EWP 14th cheapest of 38 funds
BBCA vs EWP Dividends
- BBCA 1.68%
- EWP 2.96%, better
- BBCA $1.75
- EWP $1.66
- BBCA $0.42
- EWP $0.92
- BBCA Sep 22, 2026
- EWP Jun 15, 2026
- BBCA Sep 24, 2026
- EWP Jun 18, 2026
- BBCA Quarterly
- EWP Twice a year
Distribution history
BBCA vs EWP Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- BBCA
- EWP
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BBCA 12.9%, betterEWP 16.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- BBCA 1.55, betterEWP 1.54
- Worst fall
- BBCA −24.4%, betterEWP −30.2%
- Market sensitivity
- BBCA 0.88EWP 0.86
BBCA and EWP in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.19% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.


