EWC ranks 1st and EWP 10th of 38 funds in the Developed Single Country Category.
EWC vs EWP
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
0.50%0.50%
EWC 3.7×the volume
1.68M453K
EWC +0.4pt
+11.4%+11.0%
EWC vs EWP Performance
+71.2%+133.5%
- EWC 0.50%
- EWP 0.50%
- EWC $7.58B
- EWP $1.94B
- EWC +21.1%, better
- EWP +15.7%
- EWC 1.24%
- EWP 2.96%, better
- EWC 83
- EWP 25
- EWC 1.68M sh, better
- EWP 453K sh
- EWC $60.62
- EWP $56.31
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EWC | EWP |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B55 | B55 |
| Mission | A90Higher | A79 |
| Risk | A87Higher | A70 |
| Tradability | A97Higher | B67 |
| Holdings | A78Higher | D34 |
| Durability | A80Higher | A75 |
Rank among Developed Single Country funds
Same Category. EWC and EWP are both graded against the same 38 Developed Single Country funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EWCA
EWPB
In short
EWC A 1996 original: Canada's large and mid caps in one ticker, back when single-country funds were still a novelty. About 80 names, held through a capped MSCI index built so one giant can't swamp the basket.
EWP Spain in one ticker. Trading since 1996, back when single-country ETFs were a novelty, EWP still does one job: track an index of Spanish equities and hold a capped basket of the country's largest listed companies.
Stated mandate
EWC The fund seeks to track an index representing Canadian equities, providing exposure to large- and mid-sized companies in Canada.
EWP The fund seeks to track an index composed of Spanish equities.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EWC vs EWP Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EWC vs EWP Cost
Same expense ratio
$9,979
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EWC 0.50%
$9,979
EWP 0.50%
$9,979
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EWC | EWP |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | $900 | $900 |
| 20 | $3,460 | $3,460 |
| 30 | $9,979 | $9,979 |
- 0.50%EWC
- 0.50%EWP
- Middle half of Developed Single Country funds
- Median 0.50%
EWC 14th cheapest of 38 funds
EWP 14th cheapest of 38 funds
EWC vs EWP Dividends
- EWC 1.24%
- EWP 2.96%, better
- EWC $0.75
- EWP $1.66
- EWC $0.28
- EWP $0.92
- EWC Jun 15, 2026
- EWP Jun 15, 2026
- EWC Jun 18, 2026
- EWP Jun 18, 2026
- EWC Twice a year
- EWP Twice a year
Distribution history
EWC vs EWP Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- EWC
- EWP
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EWC 13.1%, betterEWP 16.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- EWC 1.54EWP 1.54Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Worst fall
- EWC −24.8%, betterEWP −30.2%
- Market sensitivity
- EWC 0.88EWP 0.86
EWC and EWP in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.50% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





