FLGB ranks 3rd and EWP 10th of 38 funds in the Developed Single Country Category.
EWP vs FLGB
FLGB −0.41pt a year
0.50%0.09%
EWP 4.3×the volume
453K106K
EWP +6.8pt
+18.5%+11.7%
EWP vs FLGB Performance
+133.5%+74.3%
- EWP 0.50%
- FLGB 0.09%, better
- EWP $1.94B
- FLGB $878M
- EWP +15.7%
- FLGB +15.9%, better
- EWP 2.96%, better
- FLGB 2.87%
- EWP 25
- FLGB 89
- EWP 453K sh, better
- FLGB 106K sh
- EWP $56.31
- FLGB $36.82
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EWP | FLGB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B55 | A93Higher |
| Mission | A79Higher | A73 |
| Risk | A70 | A73Higher |
| Tradability | B67Higher | B62 |
| Holdings | D34 | A72Higher |
| Durability | A75Higher | C53 |
Rank among Developed Single Country funds
Same Category. EWP and FLGB are both graded against the same 38 Developed Single Country funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EWPB
FLGBA
In short
EWP Spain in one ticker. Trading since 1996, back when single-country ETFs were a novelty, EWP still does one job: track an index of Spanish equities and hold a capped basket of the country's largest listed companies.
FLGB Britain in one ticker for nine basis points. Franklin's UK tracker follows a capped FTSE index of roughly 110 British companies and charges a small fraction of what the typical index fund in its peer group costs.
Stated mandate
EWP The fund seeks to track an index composed of Spanish equities.
FLGB The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the performance of the FTSE UK RIC Capped Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EWP vs FLGB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EWP vs FLGB Cost
Overpaying EWP vs FLGB
$8,081
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EWP 0.50%
$9,979
FLGB 0.09%
$1,898
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EWP | FLGB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $900 | $165 | $735 |
| 20 | $3,460 | $646 | $2,814 |
| 30 | $9,979 | $1,898 | $8,081 |
- 0.50%EWP
- 0.09%FLGB, cheaper
- Middle half of Developed Single Country funds
- Median 0.50%
FLGB cheapest of 38 funds
EWP 14th cheapest of 38 funds
EWP vs FLGB Dividends
- EWP 2.96%, better
- FLGB 2.87%
- EWP $1.66
- FLGB $1.06
- EWP $0.92
- FLGB $0.47
- EWP Jun 15, 2026
- FLGB Jun 26, 2026
- EWP Jun 18, 2026
- FLGB Jul 6, 2026
- EWP Twice a year
- FLGB Twice a year
Distribution history
EWP vs FLGB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- EWP
- FLGB
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EWP 16.5%FLGB 11.0%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- EWP 1.54, betterFLGB 1.44
- Worst fall
- EWP −30.2%FLGB −25.9%, better
- Market sensitivity
- EWP 0.86FLGB 0.75
EWP and FLGB in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.50% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.



