EWU ranks 6th and FLKR 15th of 38 funds in the Developed Single Country Category.
EWU vs FLKR
FLKR −0.41pt a year
0.50%0.09%
EWU 1.4×the volume
1.15M830K
FLKR +4.5pt
+11.6%+16.1%
EWU vs FLKR Performance
+72.8%+110.9%
- EWU 0.50%
- FLKR 0.09%, better
- EWU $3.73B
- FLKR $1.79B
- EWU +15.9%
- FLKR +62.5%, better
- EWU 3.13%, better
- FLKR 2.92%
- EWU 72
- FLKR 148
- EWU 1.15M sh, better
- FLKR 830K sh
- EWU $47.68
- FLKR $51.47
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EWU | FLKR |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B55 | A93Higher |
| Mission | A71Higher | B57 |
| Risk | A75Higher | D25 |
| Tradability | A81Higher | C49 |
| Holdings | B69Higher | C50 |
| Durability | A78Higher | B60 |
Rank among Developed Single Country funds
Same Category. EWU and FLKR are both graded against the same 38 Developed Single Country funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EWUB
FLKRB
In short
EWU Trading since 1996, EWU is the veteran one-ticker route into British blue chips: roughly 70 UK stocks in a single MSCI-tracked basket, held through Brexit, rate cycles and everything in between.
FLKR Korea in one passive basket for 0.09% a year, a fraction of the 0.50% typical single-country fee. Roughly 160 Korean names tracking a capped FTSE index, run as plain index plumbing rather than a stock-picking bet.
Stated mandate
EWU The fund seeks to track an index of U.K. equities, providing targeted exposure to companies in the United Kingdom and a way to express a single-country investment view.
FLKR The Fund uses a passive indexing approach to seek returns that closely correspond, before fees and expenses, to the FTSE South Korea Capped Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EWU vs FLKR Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EWU vs FLKR Cost
Overpaying EWU vs FLKR
$8,081
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EWU 0.50%
$9,979
FLKR 0.09%
$1,898
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EWU | FLKR | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $900 | $165 | $735 |
| 20 | $3,460 | $646 | $2,814 |
| 30 | $9,979 | $1,898 | $8,081 |
- 0.50%EWU
- 0.09%FLKR, cheaper
- Middle half of Developed Single Country funds
- Median 0.50%
FLKR cheapest of 38 funds
EWU 14th cheapest of 38 funds
EWU vs FLKR Dividends
- EWU 3.13%, better
- FLKR 2.92%
- EWU $1.50
- FLKR $1.47
- EWU $0.67
- FLKR $0.30
- EWU Jun 15, 2026
- FLKR Jun 26, 2026
- EWU Jun 18, 2026
- FLKR Jul 6, 2026
- EWU Twice a year
- FLKR Twice a year
Distribution history
EWU vs FLKR Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- EWU
- FLKR
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EWU 10.8%, betterFLKR 43.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- EWU 1.40, betterFLKR 0.97
- Worst fall
- EWU −24.9%, betterFLKR −41.3%
- Market sensitivity
- EWU 0.71FLKR 2.57
EWU and FLKR in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.50% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





