FAS ranks 3rd and LABU 11th of 30 funds in the 3x Leveraged Long Category.
FAS vs LABU
FAS −0.08pt a year
0.88%0.96%
LABU 1.00×the volume
413K415K
FAS +28.8pt
+20.9%−7.9%
FAS vs LABU Performance
+31.4%−76.4%
- FAS 0.88%, better
- LABU 0.96%
- FAS $2.17B
- LABU $673M
- FAS +12.3%
- LABU +89.6%, better
- FAS 8.87%, better
- LABU 0.37%
- FAS 87
- LABU 168
- FAS 413K sh
- LABU 415K sh, better
- FAS $168.18
- LABU $256.47
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FAS | LABU |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A92Higher | B62 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B69Higher | C45 |
| Tradability | A73Higher | C49 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B66Higher | B59 |
Rank among 3x Leveraged Long funds
Same Category. FAS and LABU are both graded against the same 30 3x Leveraged Long funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FASA
LABUB
In short
FAS Born in November 2008 with the banking system on fire, FAS aims to deliver three times the daily move of the Financial Select Sector Index. A one-day tool on roughly 80 financial stocks, built around a single-day objective.
LABU Three times the daily move of an index of roughly 160 biotech stocks, the corner of the market where one trial readout resets the tape. Direxion's 2015-vintage bull leg, with a bear twin wired to the same benchmark.
Stated mandate
FAS The fund seeks a daily return equal to three times the performance of the Financial Select Sector Index, before fees and expenses. It is designed for a single-day objective rather than a multiple of the index’s cumulative return over longer periods.
LABU The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 300% of the performance of the S&P Biotechnology Select Industry Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FAS vs LABU Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FAS vs LABU Cost
Overpaying LABU vs FAS
$1,329
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FAS 0.88%
$16,705
LABU 0.96%
$18,034
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FAS | LABU | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,559 | $1,695 | $136 |
| 20 | $5,891 | $6,383 | $492 |
| 30 | $16,705 | $18,034 | $1,329 |
- 0.88%FAS, cheaper
- 0.96%LABU
- Middle half of 3x Leveraged Long funds
- Median 0.96%
FAS 4th cheapest of 30 funds
LABU 11th cheapest of 30 funds
FAS vs LABU Dividends
- FAS 8.87%, better
- LABU 0.37%
- FAS $14.62
- LABU $0.91
- FAS $1.00
- LABU $0.91
- FAS Sep 22, 2026
- LABU Dec 23, 2025
- FAS Sep 29, 2026
- LABU Dec 31, 2025
- FAS Quarterly
- LABU Quarterly
Distribution history
FAS vs LABU Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FAS
- LABU
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FAS 46.3%, betterLABU 76.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- FAS 1.03, betterLABU 0.96
- Worst fall
- FAS −66.9%, betterLABU −97.1%
- Market sensitivity
- FAS 2.63LABU 3.16
FAS and LABU in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.88% · 0.78%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.96% · 0.78%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.88% · 0.94%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.96% · 0.94%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.88% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.96% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
