TQQQ ranks 1st and LABU 11th of 30 funds in the 3x Leveraged Long Category.
LABU vs TQQQ
TQQQ −0.18pt a year
0.96%0.78%
TQQQ 138.8×the volume
415K57.5M
TQQQ +45.8pt
−7.9%+37.9%
LABU vs TQQQ Performance
−76.4%+64.2%
- LABU 0.96%
- TQQQ 0.78%, better
- LABU $673M
- TQQQ $32.1B
- LABU +89.6%, better
- TQQQ +7.1%
- LABU 0.37%
- TQQQ 0.78%, better
- LABU 168
- TQQQ 116
- LABU 415K sh
- TQQQ 57.5M sh, better
- LABU $256.47
- TQQQ $61.97
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | LABU | TQQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B62 | A97Higher |
| Mission | A84 | |
| Risk | C45 | B57Higher |
| Tradability | C49 | A97Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B59 | A79Higher |
Rank among 3x Leveraged Long funds
Same Category. LABU and TQQQ are both graded against the same 30 3x Leveraged Long funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
LABUB
TQQQA
In short
LABU Three times the daily move of an index of roughly 160 biotech stocks, the corner of the market where one trial readout resets the tape. Direxion's 2015-vintage bull leg, with a bear twin wired to the same benchmark.
TQQQ The original 3x Nasdaq-100 trade, live since 2010. Leverage resets every day, chasing three times the index's one-day move, and it is one of the most heavily traded names in its corner of the market.
Stated mandate
LABU The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 300% of the performance of the S&P Biotechnology Select Industry Index.
TQQQ The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to three times the daily performance of the Nasdaq-100 Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
LABU vs TQQQ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
LABU vs TQQQ Cost
Overpaying LABU vs TQQQ
$3,032
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
LABU 0.96%
$18,034
TQQQ 0.78%
$15,002
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | LABU | TQQQ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,695 | $1,388 | $307 |
| 20 | $6,383 | $5,268 | $1,115 |
| 30 | $18,034 | $15,002 | $3,032 |
- 0.96%LABU
- 0.78%TQQQ, cheaper
- Middle half of 3x Leveraged Long funds
- Median 0.96%
TQQQ 2nd cheapest of 30 funds
LABU 11th cheapest of 30 funds
LABU vs TQQQ Dividends
- LABU 0.37%
- TQQQ 0.78%, better
- LABU $0.91
- TQQQ $0.48
- LABU $0.91
- TQQQ $0.16
- LABU Dec 23, 2025
- TQQQ Sep 23, 2026
- LABU Dec 31, 2025
- TQQQ Sep 29, 2026
- LABU Quarterly
- TQQQ Quarterly
Distribution history
LABU vs TQQQ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- LABU
- TQQQ
Risk facts
- Volatility
- LABU 76.7%TQQQ 56.9%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- LABU 0.96TQQQ 0.98, better
- Worst fall
- LABU −97.1%TQQQ −81.7%, better
- Market sensitivity
- LABU 3.16TQQQ 3.71
LABU and TQQQ in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.96% · 0.94%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.78% · 0.94%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.96% · 0.88%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.78% · 0.88%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.96% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.78% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
