Skip to content

FCA vs FLCH

First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund

FCACNasdaq

Franklin FTSE China ETF

FLCHANYSE Arca

Overlap

9.7%by weight

Expense ratio

FLCH −0.61pt a year

FCA0.80%FLCH0.19%

Avg volume · 30D

FLCH 2.5×the volume

FCA44.2KFLCH108K

5Y return · a year

FCA +5.2pt

FCA+1.1%FLCH−4.1%

FCA vs FLCH Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+5.6%FCA−18.7%FLCH

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. FCA +5.6%. FLCH −18.7%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−40%20%40%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
FCA 0.80%
FLCH 0.19%, better
Fund size
FCA $27M
FLCH $252M
1Y total return
FCA −12.7%, better
FLCH −20.9%
Yield (12M)
FCA 5.99%, better
FLCH 2.63%
Holdings
FCA 53
FLCH 1112
Avg volume (30D)
FCA 44.2K sh
FLCH 108K sh, better
NAV per share
FCA $23.72
FLCH $19.38
52W range

ETF.net Grade

FCA: Cost 21, Risk 62, Mission 58, Tradability 44, Holdings 68, Durability 66. FLCH: Cost 100, Risk 64, Mission 87, Tradability 62, Holdings 65, Durability 70.
Pillar letters and Scores for FCA, FLCH, with each pillar’s weight
PillarFCAFLCH
Cost30% weightF21A100Higher
Mission25% weightB58A87Higher
Risk15% weightB62B64Higher
Tradability15% weightC44B62Higher
Holdings10% weightB68HigherB65
Durability5% weightB66A70Higher

Rank among China funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. FCA and FLCH are both graded against the same 28 China funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

China⁠

Category · 28 funds
See all 28 ›

FLCH ranks 2nd and FCA 18th of 28 funds in the China Category.

  1. Rank 1ACXSEWisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises FundScore 81
  2. Rank 2AFLCHFranklin FTSE China ETFScore 80
  3. Rank 3AMCHIiShares MSCI China ETFScore 77
  4. Rank 18CCHIQGlobal X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETFScore 46
  5. Rank 18CFCAFirst Trust China AlphaDEX FundScore 46
  6. Rank 20CNBCENeuberger Berman China Equity ETFScore 44

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

FCACFirst Trust China AlphaDEX Fund

FLCHAFranklin FTSE China ETF

In short

FCA Most China ETFs just hold the market. FCA screens the Nasdaq China universe on growth and value factors, keeping roughly 50 names weighted by rank rather than size. A quant twist on China exposure, running since 2011.

FLCH Cheap and wide, in the best way. FLCH holds roughly a thousand Chinese stocks and charges 0.19% a year, a fraction of what most single-country China funds ask. Whole market, small toll.

Stated mandate

FCA The fund seeks to generally match, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the Nasdaq AlphaDEX China Index. It normally invests at least 90% of net assets in securities comprising that index and uses an indexing approach.

FLCH The Fund seeks investment results that closely correspond, before fees and expenses, to the performance of the FTSE China RIC Capped Index.

Why people hold it

  • FCA Not a cap-weighted mirror. The AlphaDEX screen ranks the Nasdaq China universe on growth and value factors, then selects and weights the survivors by rank, so the biggest listing isn't automatically the biggest position.firsttrust.ca
  • Concentrated on purpose: roughly 50 stocks instead of the hundreds in a broad China index. Every holding has to earn its slot through the screen.
  • Launched in 2011, which makes it one of the longer-tenured China funds on the shelf. The rules have been through multiple China booms and busts, not just a back-test.
  • Rules, not hunches. It normally keeps at least 90% of net assets in its Nasdaq index constituents and uses a straight indexing approach, so nobody is trading headlines for you.
  • FLCH 0.19% a year, against a roughly 0.70% median for China funds. It also undercuts the category stalwarts MCHI and GXC, both at 0.59%.
  • About 1,000 holdings, so you own the long tail of Chinese listings rather than a short list of mega-cap headline names.
  • One job, done tightly: mirror the FTSE China RIC Capped Index before fees. On tracking it ranks among the strongest builds in its China peer group.sec.gov

Worth knowing

  • FCA The screen costs money: 0.80% a year, versus a fraction of that at plain cap-weighted China trackers such as FLCH (0.19%) and CXSE (0.32%).
  • Small asset base and thin trading volume. Bid-ask spreads and order size matter more here than at the category giants, and premiums or discounts can widen.
  • Factor weighting means returns can drift well away from the headline China indexes in either direction. That divergence is the point, and it cuts both ways.
  • FLCH It is China or nothing. Policy shifts, regulatory news and the currency drive the ride, with no other market in the basket to cushion it.
  • Mid-sized and only moderately traded next to the category's giants, so bid-ask spreads can bite more on larger orders.
  • Cash comes once or twice a year, not monthly. This is an equity index vehicle, not an income schedule.

Full FCA profile⁠

Full FLCH profile⁠

FCA vs FLCH Holdings

How FCA and FLCH differ

Overlap by weight

9.7%

Shared holdings make up 92.0% of FCA and 9.7% of FLCH.

Level by level

  • Holdings47 in both9.7%
  • Sector11 Sectors68.6%
  • Countryby domicile96.3%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

Sector weights in FCA and FLCH, widest gap first
SectorMore in FCAMore in FLCH
Consumer DiscretionaryFLCH +13.8 points
CommunicationFLCH +12.6 points
EnergyFCA +8.8 points
Health CareFCA +5.4 points
IndustrialsFCA +5.2 points
UtilitiesFCA +5.1 points
TechnologyFCA +3.6 points
Consumer StaplesFLCH +3.3 points
MaterialsFCA +1.9 points
Real EstateFLCH +1.6 points
FinancialsFCA +1.4 points

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in FCA and FLCH, widest gap first
CountryMore in FCAMore in FLCH
ChinaFLCH +3.2 points
Hong KongFCA +2.1 points
United StatesFCA +1.6 points
Other countries (3)FLCH +0.5 points

Outside the US: FCA 4% developed, 96% emerging. FLCH 2% developed, 98% emerging.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • FCA36.7%
  • FLCH39.3%

Securities held

  • FCA50
  • FLCH1,109

Asset class

FCA
Equity
FLCH
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in FCA3
  • In both47
  • Only in FLCH1,062

Only in FCA

3 securities, 7.0% of FCA by weight

  • Lenovo Group Limited3.12%
  • AAC Technologies Holdings Inc.2.49%
  • Shenzhou International Group Holdings Limited1.41%

Only in FLCH

1,062 securities, 90.3% of FLCH by weight

  • Tencent Holdings Ltd11.56%
  • Alibaba Group Holding Ltd8.88%
  • China Construction Bank-H4.38%

Weight gaps

All 47 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in FCA and FLCH, widest gap first
HoldingMore in FCAMore in FLCH
Cosco Shipping Holdings Company, Ltd. (Class H)FCA +4.79 points
ENN Energy Holdings LimitedFCA +4.20 points
PetroChina Company Limited (Class H)FCA +3.58 points
China Oilfield Services Limited (Class H)FCA +3.54 points
China Tower Corporation Limited (Class H)FCA +3.48 points
China Reinsurance (Group) Corporation (Class H)FCA +3.07 points
Anhui Conch Cement Company Limited (Class H)FCA +2.86 points
Sinotruk (Hong Kong) LimitedFCA +2.79 points

All 50 FCA holdings⁠All 967 FLCH holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

FCA vs FLCH Cost

Overpaying FCA vs FLCH

$11,394

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • FCA 0.80%

    $15,346

  • FLCH 0.19%

    $3,952

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • FCA 0.80%
  • FLCH 0.19%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530FCA $15,346FLCH $3,952

Year by year

YearFCAFLCHOverpaying
10$1,422$347$1,075
20$5,393$1,351$4,042
30$15,346$3,952$11,394

Expense ratio

  • 0.80%FCA
  • 0.19%FLCH, cheaper
  • Middle half of China funds
  • Median 0.65%

FLCH cheapest of 28 funds

FCA 23rd cheapest of 28 funds

FCA vs FLCH Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
FCA 5.99%, better
FLCH 2.63%
Payout (12M)
FCA $1.42
FLCH $0.51
Last payment
FCA $0.89
FLCH $0.14
Ex-dividend
FCA Sep 24, 2026
FLCH Jun 26, 2026
Paid on
FCA Sep 30, 2026
FLCH Jul 6, 2026
Frequency
FCA Quarterly
FLCH Twice a year

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

FCAQuarterly · 32 paymentsAll FCA payments⁠
One bar per payment. 32 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Jun 22, 2017 $0.27; Sep 21, 2017 $0.13; Dec 21, 2017 $0.28; Jun 21, 2018 $0.24; Sep 14, 2018 $0.39; Dec 18, 2018 $0.10; Jun 14, 2019 $0.41; Sep 25, 2019 $0.35; Dec 13, 2019 $0.24; Jun 25, 2020 $0.52; Sep 24, 2020 $0.46; Dec 24, 2020 $0.21; Mar 25, 2021 $0.04; Jun 24, 2021 $0.27; Sep 23, 2021 $0.91; Dec 23, 2021 $0.12; Jun 24, 2022 $0.32; Sep 23, 2022 $0.36; Dec 23, 2022 $0.60; Jun 27, 2023 $0.52; Sep 22, 2023 $0.45; Dec 22, 2023 $0.08; Mar 21, 2024 $0.10; Jun 27, 2024 $0.37; Sep 26, 2024 $0.54; Dec 13, 2024 $0.02; Mar 27, 2025 $0.03; Jun 26, 2025 $0.34; Sep 25, 2025 $0.26; Dec 12, 2025 $0.13; Jun 25, 2026 $0.40; Sep 24, 2026 $0.89. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD
FLCHTwice a year · 18 paymentsAll FLCH payments⁠
One bar per payment. 18 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 20, 2017 $0.00084; Jun 20, 2018 $0.10; Dec 20, 2018 $0.29; Jun 11, 2019 $0.03; Dec 11, 2019 $0.46; Jun 11, 2020 $0.04; Dec 14, 2020 $0.25; Jun 10, 2021 $0.03; Dec 13, 2021 $0.34; Jun 17, 2022 $0.14; Dec 16, 2022 $0.36; Jun 16, 2023 $0.19; Dec 15, 2023 $0.37; Jun 21, 2024 $0.12; Dec 20, 2024 $0.41; Jun 20, 2025 $0.19; Dec 19, 2025 $0.37; Jun 26, 2026 $0.14. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD

FCA vs FLCH Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • FCA
  • FLCH
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: FLCH −48.1% · Oct 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−50%−40%−30%−20%−10%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
FCA 21.5%FLCH 21.1%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
FCA 0.52, betterFLCH 0.29
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
FCA −34.5%, betterFLCH −48.1%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
FCA 0.69FLCH 0.55

Popular comparisons

  • FCACvsCXSEA

    First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund · WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.80% · 0.32%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FLCHAvsCXSEA

    Franklin FTSE China ETF · WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.19% · 0.32%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FCACvsMCHIA

    First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund · iShares MSCI China ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.80% · 0.59%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FLCHAvsMCHIA

    Franklin FTSE China ETF · iShares MSCI China ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.19% · 0.59%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FCACvsGXCA

    First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund · State Street SPDR S&P China ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.80% · 0.59%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FLCHAvsGXCA

    Franklin FTSE China ETF · State Street SPDR S&P China ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.19% · 0.59%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.