CXSE ranks 1st and FCA 18th of 28 funds in the China Category.
CXSE vs FCA
CXSE −0.48pt a year
0.32%0.80%
FCA 1.2×the volume
37.2K44.2K
FCA +3.0pt
+3.1%+6.1%
CXSE vs FCA Performance
−39.0%+5.6%
- CXSE 0.32%, better
- FCA 0.80%
- CXSE $372M
- FCA $27M
- CXSE −24.9%
- FCA −12.7%, better
- CXSE 2.22%
- FCA 5.99%, better
- CXSE 241
- FCA 53
- CXSE 37.2K sh
- FCA 44.2K sh, better
- CXSE $31.37
- FCA $23.72
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CXSE | FCA |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A97Higher | F21 |
| Mission | A100Higher | B58 |
| Risk | C47 | B62Higher |
| Tradability | B63Higher | C44 |
| Holdings | A74Higher | B68 |
| Durability | A79Higher | B66 |
Rank among China funds
Same Category. CXSE and FCA are both graded against the same 28 China funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CXSEA
FCAC
In short
CXSE CXSE tracks an index that screens state-owned enterprises out of China, leaving the privately run companies. A tilt toward entrepreneurs rather than Beijing's balance sheet, at a fee well under the typical China fund.
FCA Most China ETFs just hold the market. FCA screens the Nasdaq China universe on growth and value factors, keeping roughly 50 names weighted by rank rather than size. A quant twist on China exposure, running since 2011.
Stated mandate
CXSE The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Index.
FCA The fund seeks to generally match, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the Nasdaq AlphaDEX China Index. It normally invests at least 90% of net assets in securities comprising that index and uses an indexing approach.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CXSE vs FCA Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CXSE vs FCA Cost
Overpaying FCA vs CXSE
$8,804
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CXSE 0.32%
$6,542
FCA 0.80%
$15,346
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CXSE | FCA | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $580 | $1,422 | $842 |
| 20 | $2,250 | $5,393 | $3,143 |
| 30 | $6,542 | $15,346 | $8,804 |
- 0.32%CXSE, cheaper
- 0.80%FCA
- Middle half of China funds
- Median 0.65%
CXSE 2nd cheapest of 28 funds
FCA 23rd cheapest of 28 funds
CXSE vs FCA Dividends
- CXSE 2.22%
- FCA 5.99%, better
- CXSE $0.69
- FCA $1.42
- CXSE $0.26
- FCA $0.89
- CXSE Sep 25, 2026
- FCA Sep 24, 2026
- CXSE Sep 29, 2026
- FCA Sep 30, 2026
- CXSE Quarterly
- FCA Quarterly
Distribution history
CXSE vs FCA Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- CXSE
- FCA
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CXSE 24.9%FCA 21.5%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- CXSE 0.12FCA 0.52, better
- Worst fall
- CXSE −57.6%FCA −34.5%, better
- Market sensitivity
- CXSE 0.75FCA 0.69
Popular comparisons
- 0.32% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.80% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.32% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.80% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.32% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.80% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.