MCHI ranks 3rd and FCA 18th of 28 funds in the China Category.
FCA vs MCHI
MCHI −0.21pt a year
0.80%0.59%
MCHI 50.6×the volume
44.2K2.24M
FCA +3.8pt
+6.1%+2.3%
FCA vs MCHI Performance
+5.6%−20.6%
- FCA 0.80%
- MCHI 0.59%, better
- FCA $27M
- MCHI $5.49B
- FCA −12.7%, better
- MCHI −21.3%
- FCA 5.99%, better
- MCHI 2.23%
- FCA 53
- MCHI 581
- FCA 44.2K sh
- MCHI 2.24M sh, better
- FCA $23.72
- MCHI $48.89
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FCA | MCHI |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F21 | A78Higher |
| Mission | B58 | A87Higher |
| Risk | B62 | B62 |
| Tradability | C44 | A88Higher |
| Holdings | B68Higher | B58 |
| Durability | B66 | A91Higher |
Rank among China funds
Same Category. FCA and MCHI are both graded against the same 28 China funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FCAC
MCHIA
In short
FCA Most China ETFs just hold the market. FCA screens the Nasdaq China universe on growth and value factors, keeping roughly 50 names weighted by rank rather than size. A quant twist on China exposure, running since 2011.
MCHI The default one-ticker way to own China. MCHI has tracked the MSCI China Index since 2011, holding roughly 600 stocks open to international investors, and it stays actively traded.
Stated mandate
FCA The fund seeks to generally match, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the Nasdaq AlphaDEX China Index. It normally invests at least 90% of net assets in securities comprising that index and uses an indexing approach.
MCHI The fund seeks to track an index of Chinese equities available to international investors.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FCA vs MCHI Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FCA vs MCHI Cost
Overpaying FCA vs MCHI
$3,711
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FCA 0.80%
$15,346
MCHI 0.59%
$11,635
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FCA | MCHI | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,422 | $1,058 | $364 |
| 20 | $5,393 | $4,051 | $1,342 |
| 30 | $15,346 | $11,635 | $3,711 |
- 0.80%FCA
- 0.59%MCHI, cheaper
- Middle half of China funds
- Median 0.65%
MCHI 5th cheapest of 28 funds
FCA 23rd cheapest of 28 funds
FCA vs MCHI Dividends
- FCA 5.99%, better
- MCHI 2.23%
- FCA $1.42
- MCHI $1.10
- FCA $0.89
- MCHI $0.36
- FCA Sep 24, 2026
- MCHI Jun 15, 2026
- FCA Sep 30, 2026
- MCHI Jun 18, 2026
- FCA Quarterly
- MCHI Twice a year
Distribution history
FCA vs MCHI Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FCA
- MCHI
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FCA 21.5%MCHI 21.2%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- FCA 0.52, betterMCHI 0.26
- Worst fall
- FCA −34.5%, betterMCHI −49.2%
- Market sensitivity
- FCA 0.69MCHI 0.63
FCA and MCHI in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.80% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.80% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.80% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





