QEMM ranks 4th and JPEM 6th of 20 funds in the Emerging Markets Multifactor Category.
JPEM vs QEMM
QEMM −0.14pt a year
0.44%0.30%
JPEM 4.5×the volume
17.4K3.85K
QEMM +0.8pt
+6.6%+7.4%
JPEM vs QEMM Performance
+36.6%+39.0%
- JPEM 0.44%
- QEMM 0.30%, better
- JPEM $362M
- QEMM $56M
- JPEM +7.6%
- QEMM +16.8%, better
- JPEM 4.68%, better
- QEMM 4.65%
- JPEM 562
- QEMM 836
- JPEM 17.4K sh, better
- QEMM 3.85K sh
- JPEM $61.28
- QEMM $76.87
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | JPEM | QEMM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C53 | A82Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | A74Higher | B67 |
| Tradability | B68Higher | D36 |
| Holdings | B63Higher | B59 |
| Durability | A72Higher | C52 |
Rank among Emerging Markets Multifactor funds
Same Category. JPEM and QEMM are both graded against the same 20 Emerging Markets Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
JPEMB
QEMMB
In short
JPEM A 2015-vintage multifactor read on emerging markets: JPMorgan spreads roughly 600 names across value, quality and momentum rather than letting the biggest companies set the weights.
QEMM Instead of betting on one factor, QEMM buys value, quality and low volatility across emerging markets at once, packing roughly 800 stocks into a single MSCI factor-blend index for 0.30% a year.
Stated mandate
JPEM The fund is designed to provide emerging-markets equity exposure with potentially improved risk-adjusted returns versus a market-cap-weighted index.
QEMM The fund seeks to track the MSCI Emerging Markets (EM) Factor Mix A-Series Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
JPEM vs QEMM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
JPEM vs QEMM Cost
Overpaying JPEM vs QEMM
$2,703
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
JPEM 0.44%
$8,852
QEMM 0.30%
$6,149
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | JPEM | QEMM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $794 | $545 | $249 |
| 20 | $3,061 | $2,113 | $948 |
| 30 | $8,852 | $6,149 | $2,703 |
- 0.44%JPEM
- 0.30%QEMM, cheaper
- Middle half of Emerging Markets Multifactor funds
- Median 0.44%
QEMM 4th cheapest of 20 funds
JPEM 10th cheapest of 20 funds
JPEM vs QEMM Dividends
- JPEM 4.68%, better
- QEMM 4.65%
- JPEM $2.88
- QEMM $3.52
- JPEM $0.80
- QEMM $1.05
- JPEM Sep 22, 2026
- QEMM Jun 1, 2026
- JPEM Sep 24, 2026
- QEMM Jun 5, 2026
- JPEM Quarterly
- QEMM Twice a year
Distribution history
JPEM vs QEMM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- JPEM
- QEMM
Risk facts
- Volatility
- JPEM 10.1%, betterQEMM 13.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- JPEM 0.88QEMM 1.00, better
- Worst fall
- JPEM −21.6%, betterQEMM −27.1%
- Market sensitivity
- JPEM 0.64QEMM 0.95
Popular comparisons
- 0.44% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.44% · 0.36%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.36%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.44% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.