FDEV ranks 4th and JHMD 20th of 30 funds in the International Multifactor Category.
FDEV vs JHMD
FDEV −0.21pt a year
0.18%0.39%
JHMD 3.2×the volume
29.3K94.7K
JHMD +0.8pt
+7.8%+8.6%
FDEV vs JHMD Performance
+45.8%+51.4%
- FDEV 0.18%, better
- JHMD 0.39%
- FDEV $276M
- JHMD $995M
- FDEV +16.6%, better
- JHMD +13.2%
- FDEV 3.27%, better
- JHMD 3.08%
- FDEV 210
- JHMD 570
- FDEV 29.3K sh
- JHMD 94.7K sh, better
- FDEV $37.31
- JHMD $44.43
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FDEV | JHMD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A91Higher | D33 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | A78Higher | D37 |
| Tradability | B59 | B60Higher |
| Holdings | C48 | B68Higher |
| Durability | C42 | B57Higher |
Rank among International Multifactor funds
Same Category. FDEV and JHMD are both graded against the same 30 International Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FDEVA
JHMDC
In short
FDEV Four factors (value, quality, momentum, low volatility) blended into one developed-markets index fund at 0.18% a year. Fidelity's answer to paying up for a single-factor tilt overseas.
JHMD A Dimensional-designed index in a John Hancock wrapper: roughly 600 large developed-market stocks outside North America, weighted toward the smaller, cheaper, more profitable end of the pool. Factor investing from the firm that wrote the playbook, in plain index form.
Stated mandate
FDEV The fund seeks returns generally corresponding to the Fidelity International Multifactor Index before fees and expenses.
JHMD The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the performance of the John Hancock Dimensional Developed International Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FDEV vs JHMD Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FDEV vs JHMD Cost
Overpaying JHMD vs FDEV
$4,149
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FDEV 0.18%
$3,749
JHMD 0.39%
$7,898
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FDEV | JHMD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $328 | $705 | $377 |
| 20 | $1,281 | $2,725 | $1,444 |
| 30 | $3,749 | $7,898 | $4,149 |
- 0.18%FDEV, cheaper
- 0.39%JHMD
- Middle half of International Multifactor funds
- Median 0.34%
FDEV 3rd cheapest of 30 funds
JHMD 20th cheapest of 30 funds
FDEV vs JHMD Dividends
- FDEV 3.27%, better
- JHMD 3.08%
- FDEV $1.22
- JHMD $1.36
- FDEV $0.33
- JHMD $0.77
- FDEV Sep 18, 2026
- JHMD Jun 26, 2026
- FDEV Sep 22, 2026
- JHMD Jun 30, 2026
- FDEV Quarterly
- JHMD Twice a year
Distribution history
FDEV vs JHMD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FDEV
- JHMD
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FDEV 10.5%, betterJHMD 11.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- FDEV 1.31, betterJHMD 1.18
- Worst fall
- FDEV −27.9%, betterJHMD −28.9%
- Market sensitivity
- FDEV 0.65JHMD 0.90
Popular comparisons
- 0.18% · 0.16%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.16%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.