LRGC ranks 3rd and FDG 41st of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.
FDG vs LRGC
LRGC −0.06pt a year
0.45%0.39%
LRGC 3.0×the volume
11.3K34K
FDG +5.1pt
+25.2%+20.1%
FDG vs LRGC Performance
0.0%+11.6%
- FDG 0.45%
- LRGC 0.39%, better
- FDG $401M
- LRGC $1.33B
- FDG 0.0%
- LRGC +11.6%, better
- FDG 0.00%
- LRGC 0.53%, better
- FDG 44
- LRGC 73
- FDG 11.3K sh
- LRGC 34K sh, better
- FDG $118.87
- LRGC $83.23
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FDG | LRGC |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A71 | A82Higher |
| Mission | A70 | A79Higher |
| Risk | D34 | A92Higher |
| Tradability | C43 | A85Higher |
| Holdings | D30 | A77Higher |
| Durability | A73 | A79Higher |
Rank among US Active Growth funds
Same Category. FDG and LRGC are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FDGC
LRGCA
In short
FDG Roughly 40 stocks, no index to hug: FDG is American Century's high-conviction swing at US large-cap growth, running since 2020 and priced under the typical active fund in its peer group.
LRGC AB's stock pickers in an ETF wrapper: roughly 70 large-cap US names picked with fundamental research plus quant screens, measured against the S&P 500. Active conviction, priced under the typical active peer.
Stated mandate
FDG The fund seeks long-term capital growth through a high-conviction portfolio of large-cap growth companies selected for opportunities to sustain above-average growth.
LRGC The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital. It is actively managed and normally invests at least 80% of net assets in equities of large-capitalization U.S. companies.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FDG vs LRGC Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FDG vs LRGC Cost
Overpaying FDG vs LRGC
$1,143
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FDG 0.45%
$9,041
LRGC 0.39%
$7,898
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FDG | LRGC | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $812 | $705 | $107 |
| 20 | $3,128 | $2,725 | $403 |
| 30 | $9,041 | $7,898 | $1,143 |
- 0.45%FDG
- 0.39%LRGC, cheaper
- Middle half of US Active Growth funds
- Median 0.55%
LRGC 14th cheapest of 90 funds
FDG 26th cheapest of 90 funds
FDG vs LRGC Dividends
- FDG 0.00%
- LRGC 0.53%, better
- FDG None
- LRGC $0.45
- FDG
- LRGC $0.45
- FDG
- LRGC Dec 17, 2025
- FDG
- LRGC Dec 18, 2025
- FDG
- LRGC Annual
Distribution history
FDG vs LRGC Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FDG 20.3%LRGC 12.7%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- FDG 1.06LRGC 1.26, better
- Worst fall
- FDG −43.6%LRGC −19.4%
- Market sensitivity
- FDG 1.30LRGC 1.00
FDG and LRGC in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.45% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
