FDIS ranks 2nd and XRT 3rd of 14 funds in the Consumer Discretionary (Broad) Category.
FDIS vs XRT
FDIS −0.27pt a year
0.08%0.35%
XRT 35.1×the volume
109K3.83M
FDIS +4.3pt
+13.6%+9.3%
FDIS vs XRT Performance
+19.1%+1.8%
- FDIS 0.08%, better
- XRT 0.35%
- FDIS $1.63B
- XRT $405M
- FDIS −1.7%
- XRT +10.5%, better
- FDIS 0.77%
- XRT 0.84%, better
- FDIS 242
- XRT 76
- FDIS 109K sh
- XRT 3.83M sh, better
- FDIS $100.14
- XRT $88.99
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FDIS | XRT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A96Higher | C50 |
| Mission | A85 | |
| Risk | C42 | B65Higher |
| Tradability | B60 | A87Higher |
| Holdings | C51 | A85Higher |
| Durability | B58 | B59Higher |
Rank among Consumer Discretionary (Broad) funds
Same Category. FDIS and XRT are both graded against the same 14 Consumer Discretionary (Broad) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FDISB
XRTB
In short
FDIS Cheap and wide. FDIS holds about 300 US consumer discretionary stocks rather than the sector's mega-cap handful, and charges 0.08% while the typical fund in its peer group asks roughly four times that.
XRT Pure retail, not broad consumer discretionary. XRT equal-weights roughly 80 store chains and online sellers, so a small-cap mall retailer carries about as much freight as a mega-cap giant. It has been the sector's trading vehicle since 2006.
Stated mandate
FDIS The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the performance of the MSCI USA IMI Consumer Discretionary 25/50 Index.
XRT The fund seeks to provide investment results that generally correspond to the total return performance of the S&P Retail Select Industry Index, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FDIS vs XRT Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FDIS vs XRT Cost
Overpaying XRT vs FDIS
$5,353
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FDIS 0.084%
$1,773
XRT 0.35%
$7,126
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FDIS | XRT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $154 | $634 | $480 |
| 20 | $603 | $2,454 | $1,851 |
| 30 | $1,773 | $7,126 | $5,353 |
- 0.08%FDIS, cheaper
- 0.35%XRT
- Middle half of Consumer Discretionary (Broad) funds
- Median 0.35%
FDIS 2nd cheapest of 14 funds
XRT 6th cheapest of 14 funds
FDIS vs XRT Dividends
- FDIS 0.77%
- XRT 0.84%, better
- FDIS $0.78
- XRT $0.74
- FDIS $0.20
- XRT $0.17
- FDIS Sep 18, 2026
- XRT Sep 21, 2026
- FDIS Sep 22, 2026
- XRT Sep 23, 2026
- FDIS Quarterly
- XRT Quarterly
Distribution history
FDIS vs XRT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FDIS
- XRT
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FDIS 18.2%, betterXRT 20.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- FDIS 0.65, betterXRT 0.61
- Worst fall
- FDIS −39.2%, betterXRT −44.6%
- Market sensitivity
- FDIS 1.26XRT 1.17
FDIS and XRT in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.08% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





