Skip to content
etf.net

FDTX vs XITK

Fidelity Disruptive Technology ETF

FDTXBNasdaq

State Street SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF

XITKANYSE Arca

Overlap

11.2%by weight

Expense ratio

XITK −0.05pt a year

FDTX0.50%XITK0.45%

Avg volume · 30D

FDTX 20.4×the volume

FDTX43.8KXITK2.15K

3Y return · a year

FDTX +12.0pt

FDTX+30.8%XITK+18.8%

FDTX vs XITK Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+18.6%FDTX+0.6%XITK

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. FDTX +18.6%. XITK +0.6%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%−10%10%30%40%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
FDTX 0.50%
XITK 0.45%, better
Fund size
FDTX $311M
XITK $67M
1Y total return
FDTX +18.6%, better
XITK +0.6%
Yield (12M)
FDTX 0.00%
XITK 0.00%
Holdings
FDTX 46
XITK 95
Avg volume (30D)
FDTX 43.8K sh, better
XITK 2.15K sh
NAV per share
FDTX $51.25
XITK $197.42
52W range

ETF.net Grade

FDTX: Cost 81, Risk 51, Mission not scored, Tradability 56, Holdings 53, Durability 73. XITK: Cost 95, Risk 37, Mission not scored, Tradability 65, Holdings 81, Durability 73.
Pillar letters and Scores for FDTX, XITK, with each pillar’s weight
PillarFDTXXITK
Cost30% weightA81A95Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightC51HigherD37
Tradability15% weightB56B65Higher
Holdings10% weightC53A81Higher
Durability5% weightA73A73

Rank among Disruptive Innovation funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. FDTX and XITK are both graded against the same 30 Disruptive Innovation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Disruptive Innovation⁠

Category · 30 funds
See all 30 ›

XITK ranks 4th and FDTX 6th of 30 funds in the Disruptive Innovation Category.

  1. Rank 1AXTiShares Future Exponential Technologies ETFScore 86
  2. Rank 2AKOMPState Street SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETFScore 83
  3. Rank 3ATRFMAAM Transformers ETFScore 74
  4. Rank 4AXITKState Street SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETFScore 73
  5. Rank 5AGINNGoldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETFScore 70
  6. Rank 6BDTECALPS Disruptive Technologies ETFScore 65
  7. Rank 6BFDTXFidelity Disruptive Technology ETFScore 65
  8. Rank 6BTNXTT. Rowe Price Innovation Leaders ETFScore 65

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

FDTXBFidelity Disruptive Technology ETF

XITKAState Street SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF

In short

FDTX Fidelity's own read on disruptive tech, boiled down to roughly 50 names and priced below the typical thematic fund. Running since April 2020, it goes narrow where broad tech funds go wide.

XITK Most innovation funds pick a theme and hope. XITK lets the data pick: FactSet ranks tech and electronic-media segments by growth, keeps the top quartile, then equal-weights roughly 100 names so no single giant runs the show.

Stated mandate

FDTX The fund seeks long-term capital growth and normally invests at least 80% of its assets in securities of disruptive technology companies.

XITK The fund seeks to track the total return of the FactSet Innovative Technology Index before fees and expenses. Its mandate targets innovative technology-related companies with robust revenue growth and leading-edge products or services.

Why people hold it

  • FDTX Charges 0.50% a year against a 0.65% median for disruptive-innovation funds. On a thematic shelf, that is a genuine discount.
  • Roughly 50 holdings, with at least 80% of assets committed to disruptive technology companies and a stated goal of long-term capital growth. Concentrated enough that individual winners register.fidelity.com
  • Live since April 2020, a longer run than most theme funds get, and one of the stronger profiles in the disruptive-innovation peer group.
  • Mid-size asset base and moderate trading volume, so getting in and out is usually straightforward rather than a hunt for a counterparty.
  • XITK Costs 0.45% a year, comfortably under the 0.65% median for disruptive-innovation funds, and it does it inside a plain index wrapper from a major ETF shop.
  • Equal weighting at each reset gives the hundredth holding the same slot as the first, so results lean on the whole basket rather than two or three mega-caps.factset.com
  • Screens segments, not slogans: only companies drawing most of their revenue from the fastest-growing corners of tech and electronic media make the cut.factset.comssga.com
  • Trading since 2016, giving it a live record across several tech cycles, and it sits in the upper tier of our innovation-fund cohort review.

Worth knowing

  • FDTX Cheaper doors to the same theme exist. Index-based KOMP runs at 0.20%, well under this fund's 0.50%.
  • About 50 stocks in one technology theme is a narrow book. Expect sharper moves in both directions than a diversified fund delivers.
  • No third-party index is named in the mandate, so what counts as 'disruptive' is Fidelity's judgment rather than a published rulebook.fidelity.com
  • XITK Growth-screened tech, equal-weighted, means smaller names carry a giant's weight. Expect a rougher ride than a cap-weighted tech fund.
  • Thinly traded for its category and modest in size, so bid-ask spreads can run wider than the household-name tech ETFs.
  • Cheaper shelfmates exist: KOMP runs a broad new-economy basket for 0.20%.

Full FDTX profile⁠

Full XITK profile⁠

FDTX vs XITK Holdings

How FDTX and XITK differ

Overlap by weight

11.2%

Shared holdings make up 26.9% of FDTX and 12.9% of XITK.

Level by level

  • Holdings8 in both11.2%
  • Countryby domicile79.3%
  • Sector7 Sectors93.2%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

Sector weights in FDTX and XITK, widest gap first
SectorMore in FDTXMore in XITK
Consumer DiscretionaryFDTX +5.1 points
Health CareXITK +4.2 points
TechnologyFDTX +1.8 points
FinancialsXITK +0.9 points
IndustrialsXITK +0.8 points
CommunicationXITK +0.6 points
Real EstateXITK +0.4 points

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in FDTX and XITK, widest gap first
CountryMore in FDTXMore in XITK
United StatesXITK +17.9 points
TaiwanFDTX +8.7 points
CanadaFDTX +5.7 points
JapanFDTX +2.8 points
ChinaXITK +2.2 points
MexicoFDTX +1.3 points
NetherlandsFDTX +1.2 points
SwitzerlandFDTX +1.1 points
IsraelXITK +0.6 points

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • FDTX46.9%
  • XITK22.1%

Securities held

  • FDTX41
  • XITK94

Asset class

FDTX
Equity
XITK
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in FDTX33
  • In both8
  • Only in XITK86

Only in FDTX

33 securities, 73.2% of FDTX by weight

  • Taiwan Semic Mfg Co Ltd Sp Adr5.99%
  • Palo Alto Networks Inc4.80%
  • Shopify Inc Class A (Us)4.67%

Only in XITK

86 securities, 87.0% of XITK by weight

  • Axt Inc4.00%
  • Applied Optoelectronics Inc2.41%
  • Digitalocean Holdings Inc2.04%

Weight gaps

All 8 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in FDTX and XITK, widest gap first
HoldingMore in FDTXMore in XITK
Palantir Technologies IncPLTRFDTX +4.74 points
NVIDIA CorpNVDAFDTX +3.33 points
Meta Platforms Inc Class AMETAFDTX +2.72 points
Datadog Inc Class ADDOGFDTX +2.61 points
Advanced Micro Devices IncAMDFDTX +1.70 points
Silicon Motion Tech Corp AdrSIMOXITK +1.21 points
Arista Networks IncANETFDTX +0.56 points
Jfrog LtdFROGXITK +0.52 points

All 50 FDTX holdings⁠All 94 XITK holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

FDTX vs XITK Cost

Overpaying FDTX vs XITK

$938

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • FDTX 0.50%

    $9,979

  • XITK 0.45%

    $9,041

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • FDTX 0.50%
  • XITK 0.45%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K$10K051015202530FDTX $9,979XITK $9,041

Year by year

YearFDTXXITKOverpaying
10$900$812$88
20$3,460$3,128$332
30$9,979$9,041$938

Expense ratio

  • 0.50%FDTX
  • 0.45%XITK, cheaper
  • Middle half of Disruptive Innovation funds
  • Median 0.65%

XITK 2nd cheapest of 30 funds

FDTX 6th cheapest of 30 funds

FDTX vs XITK Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
FDTX 0.00%
XITK 0.00%
Payout (12M)
FDTX None
XITK None

Distribution history

Per share, 2016 to 2025, same scale for both

FDTX1 paymentAll FDTX payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2016 to 2025. Jun 20, 2025 $0.002. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12016201920222025
XITK11 paymentsAll XITK payments⁠
One bar per payment. 11 payments from 2016 to 2025. Sep 16, 2016 $0.03; Dec 16, 2016 $1.06; Dec 15, 2017 $1.36; Dec 24, 2018 $1.24; Dec 23, 2019 $0.16; Dec 21, 2020 $0.13; Jun 21, 2022 $0.06; Sep 19, 2022 $0.05; Jun 20, 2023 $0.0071; Sep 18, 2023 $0.0094; Dec 18, 2023 $0.10. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12016201920222025

FDTX vs XITK Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
FDTX 27.9%XITK 25.4%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
FDTX 0.94, betterXITK 0.63
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
FDTX −27.2%since Jun 2023XITK −61.4%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
FDTX 1.70XITK 1.67

FDTX and XITK in the news

All news⁠

Popular comparisons

  • FDTXBvsXTA

    Fidelity Disruptive Technology ETF · iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.46%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • XITKAvsXTA

    State Street SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF · iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.45% · 0.46%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • FDTXBvsKOMPA

    Fidelity Disruptive Technology ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.20%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • XITKAvsKOMPA

    State Street SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.45% · 0.20%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • FDTXBvsTRFMA

    Fidelity Disruptive Technology ETF · AAM Transformers ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • XITKAvsTRFMA

    State Street SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF · AAM Transformers ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.45% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.