Skip to content
etf.net

KOMP vs XITK

State Street SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF

KOMPANYSE Arca

State Street SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF

XITKANYSE Arca

Overlap

6.0%by weight

Expense ratio

KOMP −0.25pt a year

KOMP0.20%XITK0.45%

Avg volume · 30D

KOMP 32.5×the volume

KOMP70KXITK2.15K

5Y return · a year

KOMP +4.4pt

KOMP+0.6%XITK−3.8%

KOMP vs XITK Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+3.2%KOMP−17.4%XITK

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. KOMP +3.2%. XITK −17.4%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−60%−40%20%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
KOMP 0.20%, better
XITK 0.45%
Fund size
KOMP $2.57B
XITK $67M
1Y total return
KOMP −1.6%
XITK +0.6%, better
Yield (12M)
KOMP 1.63%, better
XITK 0.00%
Holdings
KOMP 501
XITK 95
Avg volume (30D)
KOMP 70K sh, better
XITK 2.15K sh
NAV per share
KOMP $64.63
XITK $197.42
52W range

ETF.net Grade

KOMP: Cost 100, Risk 55, Mission not scored, Tradability 77, Holdings 88, Durability 88. XITK: Cost 95, Risk 37, Mission not scored, Tradability 65, Holdings 81, Durability 73.
Pillar letters and Scores for KOMP, XITK, with each pillar’s weight
PillarKOMPXITK
Cost30% weightA100HigherA95
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightB55HigherD37
Tradability15% weightA77HigherB65
Holdings10% weightA88HigherA81
Durability5% weightA88HigherA73

Rank among Disruptive Innovation funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. KOMP and XITK are both graded against the same 30 Disruptive Innovation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Disruptive Innovation⁠

Category · 30 funds
See all 30 ›

KOMP ranks 2nd and XITK 4th of 30 funds in the Disruptive Innovation Category.

  1. Rank 1AXTiShares Future Exponential Technologies ETFScore 86
  2. Rank 2AKOMPState Street SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETFScore 83
  3. Rank 3ATRFMAAM Transformers ETFScore 74
  4. Rank 4AXITKState Street SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETFScore 73
  5. Rank 5AGINNGoldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETFScore 70

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

KOMPAState Street SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF

XITKAState Street SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF

In short

KOMP Most thematic funds bet on one idea. KOMP buys the whole Fourth Industrial Revolution: 20-plus Kensho subsectors, from robotics to genetic engineering, spread across roughly 500 global stocks for 0.20% a year.

XITK Most innovation funds pick a theme and hope. XITK lets the data pick: FactSet ranks tech and electronic-media segments by growth, keeps the top quartile, then equal-weights roughly 100 names so no single giant runs the show.

Stated mandate

KOMP The Fund seeks investment results that generally correspond, before fees and expenses, to the total return performance of the S&P Kensho New Economies Composite Index.

XITK The fund seeks to track the total return of the FactSet Innovative Technology Index before fees and expenses. Its mandate targets innovative technology-related companies with robust revenue growth and leading-edge products or services.

Why people hold it

  • KOMP 0.20% a year, under a third of the typical disruptive-innovation fund's fee and below peers like XT (0.46%) and TRFM (0.49%).
  • Kensho's language-processing engine scans regulatory filings for context and keywords, so membership rests on what a company discloses it does, not an old sector label.ssga.comspglobal.com
  • About 500 global names across 20-plus subsectors, equal weighted within each group with extra weight to 'core' operators. One mega-cap can't run the show.spglobal.com
  • Trading since 2018 and now a multi-billion-dollar fund, it sits among the strongest implementations in the disruptive-innovation group.
  • XITK Costs 0.45% a year, comfortably under the 0.65% median for disruptive-innovation funds, and it does it inside a plain index wrapper from a major ETF shop.
  • Equal weighting at each reset gives the hundredth holding the same slot as the first, so results lean on the whole basket rather than two or three mega-caps.factset.com
  • Screens segments, not slogans: only companies drawing most of their revenue from the fastest-growing corners of tech and electronic media make the cut.factset.comssga.com
  • Trading since 2016, giving it a live record across several tech cycles, and it sits in the upper tier of our innovation-fund cohort review.

Worth knowing

  • KOMP Equal weighting reaches down into smaller, earlier-stage innovators, so swings run wider than a plain broad-market index fund.spglobal.com
  • Subsector weights follow a risk-adjusted-return formula with annual reconstitution, so the mix drifts toward industries that have recently performed well.ssga.comspglobal.com
  • Breadth cuts both ways: a pure play on one theme like AI or space gets diluted here across the entire innovation map.spglobal.com
  • XITK Growth-screened tech, equal-weighted, means smaller names carry a giant's weight. Expect a rougher ride than a cap-weighted tech fund.
  • Thinly traded for its category and modest in size, so bid-ask spreads can run wider than the household-name tech ETFs.
  • Cheaper shelfmates exist: KOMP runs a broad new-economy basket for 0.20%.

Full KOMP profile⁠

Full XITK profile⁠

KOMP vs XITK Holdings

How KOMP and XITK differ

Overlap by weight

6.0%

Shared holdings make up 15.6% of XITK and 6.4% of KOMP.

Level by level

  • Holdings17 in both6.0%
  • Sector11 Sectors51.6%
  • Countryby domicile92.2%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

Sector weights in KOMP and XITK, widest gap first
SectorMore in KOMPMore in XITK
TechnologyXITK +42.5 points
IndustrialsKOMP +21.6 points
Health CareKOMP +11.0 points
CommunicationXITK +5.4 points
Consumer DiscretionaryKOMP +4.3 points
FinancialsKOMP +3.3 points
MaterialsKOMP +3.1 points
UtilitiesKOMP +3.0 points
EnergyKOMP +1.5 points
Consumer StaplesKOMP +0.6 points
Real EstateXITK +0.4 points

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in KOMP and XITK, widest gap first
CountryMore in KOMPMore in XITK
United StatesXITK +7.8 points
IsraelKOMP +1.9 points
CanadaKOMP +1.7 points
BrazilKOMP +0.8 points
South KoreaKOMP +0.6 points
JapanKOMP +0.5 points
United KingdomKOMP +0.5 points
Other countries (12)KOMP +1.8 points

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • KOMP11.1%
  • XITK22.1%

Securities held

  • KOMP498
  • XITK94

Asset class

KOMP
Equity
XITK
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in KOMP481
  • In both17
  • Only in XITK77

Only in KOMP

481 securities, 93.6% of KOMP by weight

  • Twist Bioscience Corp1.90%
  • 3D Systems Corp1.18%
  • Bruker Corp1.12%

Only in XITK

77 securities, 84.4% of XITK by weight

  • Axt Inc4.00%
  • Advanced Micro Devices2.62%
  • Silicon Motion Technol Adr2.53%

Weight gaps

All 17 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in KOMP and XITK, widest gap first
HoldingMore in KOMPMore in XITK
Datadog Inc Class ADDOGXITK +1.55 points
Rubrik Inc ARBRKXITK +1.32 points
Bill Holdings IncBILLXITK +0.84 points
Broadcom IncAVGOXITK +0.82 points
Innodata IncINODXITK +0.83 points
Doximity Inc Class ADOCSXITK +0.64 points
Workiva IncWKXITK +0.62 points
Reddit Inc Class ARDDTXITK +0.52 points

All 499 KOMP holdings⁠All 94 XITK holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

KOMP vs XITK Cost

Overpaying XITK vs KOMP

$4,886

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • KOMP 0.20%

    $4,155

  • XITK 0.45%

    $9,041

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • KOMP 0.20%
  • XITK 0.45%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K$10K051015202530XITK $9,041KOMP $4,155

Year by year

YearKOMPXITKOverpaying
10$365$812$447
20$1,421$3,128$1,707
30$4,155$9,041$4,886

Expense ratio

  • 0.20%KOMP, cheaper
  • 0.45%XITK
  • Middle half of Disruptive Innovation funds
  • Median 0.65%

KOMP cheapest of 30 funds

XITK 2nd cheapest of 30 funds

KOMP vs XITK Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
KOMP 1.63%, better
XITK 0.00%
Payout (12M)
KOMP $1.02
XITK None
Last payment
KOMP $0.13
XITK No data
Ex-dividend
KOMP Sep 21, 2026
XITK No data
Paid on
KOMP Sep 23, 2026
XITK No data
Frequency
KOMP Quarterly
XITK No data

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

KOMPQuarterly · 33 paymentsAll KOMP payments⁠
One bar per payment. 33 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 24, 2018 $0.04; Mar 18, 2019 $0.05; Jun 24, 2019 $0.03; Sep 23, 2019 $0.05; Dec 23, 2019 $0.11; Dec 30, 2019 $0.05; Mar 23, 2020 $0.06; Jun 22, 2020 $0.06; Sep 21, 2020 $0.07; Dec 21, 2020 $0.20; Mar 22, 2021 $0.22; Jun 21, 2021 $0.14; Sep 20, 2021 $0.13; Dec 20, 2021 $0.36; Mar 21, 2022 $0.08; Jun 21, 2022 $0.17; Sep 19, 2022 $0.17; Dec 19, 2022 $0.15; Mar 20, 2023 $0.10; Jun 20, 2023 $0.15; Sep 18, 2023 $0.12; Dec 18, 2023 $0.22; Mar 18, 2024 $0.08; Jun 24, 2024 $0.16; Sep 23, 2024 $0.10; Dec 23, 2024 $0.19; Mar 24, 2025 $0.12; Jun 23, 2025 $0.12; Sep 22, 2025 $0.14; Dec 22, 2025 $0.72; Mar 23, 2026 $0.07; Jun 22, 2026 $0.10; Sep 21, 2026 $0.13. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD
XITK9 paymentsAll XITK payments⁠
One bar per payment. 9 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 15, 2017 $1.36; Dec 24, 2018 $1.24; Dec 23, 2019 $0.16; Dec 21, 2020 $0.13; Jun 21, 2022 $0.06; Sep 19, 2022 $0.05; Jun 20, 2023 $0.0071; Sep 18, 2023 $0.0094; Dec 18, 2023 $0.10. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD

KOMP vs XITK Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • KOMP
  • XITK
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: XITK −61.4% · Nov 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−60%−40%−20%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
KOMP 22.3%, betterXITK 25.4%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
KOMP 0.76, betterXITK 0.63
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
KOMP −45.4%, betterXITK −61.4%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
KOMP 1.65XITK 1.67

KOMP and XITK in the news

All news⁠

Popular comparisons

  • KOMPAvsXTA

    State Street SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF · iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.20% · 0.46%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • XITKAvsXTA

    State Street SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF · iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.45% · 0.46%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • KOMPAvsTRFMA

    State Street SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF · AAM Transformers ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.20% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • XITKAvsTRFMA

    State Street SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF · AAM Transformers ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.45% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • KOMPAvsGINNA

    State Street SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF · Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.20% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • XITKAvsGINNA

    State Street SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF · Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.45% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.