XT ranks 1st and XITK 4th of 30 funds in the Disruptive Innovation Category.
XITK vs XT
XITK −0.01pt a year
0.45%0.46%
XT 32.1×the volume
2.15K69.1K
XT +1.6pt
+12.9%+14.5%
XITK vs XT Performance
−17.4%+42.3%
- XITK 0.45%, better
- XT 0.46%
- XITK $67M
- XT $3.98B
- XITK +0.6%
- XT +20.1%, better
- XITK 0.00%
- XT 6.82%, better
- XITK 95
- XT 216
- XITK 2.15K sh
- XT 69.1K sh, better
- XITK $197.42
- XT $83.53
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | XITK | XT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A95 | A95 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | D37 | A91Higher |
| Tradability | B65 | A77Higher |
| Holdings | A81Higher | B66 |
| Durability | A73 | A96Higher |
Rank among Disruptive Innovation funds
Same Category. XITK and XT are both graded against the same 30 Disruptive Innovation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
XITKA
XTA
In short
XITK Most innovation funds pick a theme and hope. XITK lets the data pick: FactSet ranks tech and electronic-media segments by growth, keeps the top quartile, then equal-weights roughly 100 names so no single giant runs the show.
XT Innovation, spread thin on purpose. XT holds roughly 200 global companies scored by Morningstar analysts for exposure to a handful of exponential tech themes, so no single moonshot carries the fund.
Stated mandate
XITK The fund seeks to track the total return of the FactSet Innovative Technology Index before fees and expenses. Its mandate targets innovative technology-related companies with robust revenue growth and leading-edge products or services.
XT XT seeks to track an index of stocks from developed and emerging markets whose companies create or use exponential technologies. The strategy targets technologies with potential economic benefits, including the ability to displace older technologies or create new markets.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
XITK vs XT Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
XITK vs XT Cost
Overpaying XT vs XITK
$189
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
XITK 0.45%
$9,041
XT 0.46%
$9,230
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | XITK | XT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $812 | $830 | $18 |
| 20 | $3,128 | $3,195 | $67 |
| 30 | $9,041 | $9,230 | $189 |
- 0.45%XITK, cheaper
- 0.46%XT
- Middle half of Disruptive Innovation funds
- Median 0.65%
XITK 2nd cheapest of 30 funds
XT 3rd cheapest of 30 funds
XITK vs XT Dividends
- XITK 0.00%
- XT 6.82%, better
- XITK None
- XT $5.69
- XITK
- XT $0.36
- XITK
- XT Jun 15, 2026
- XITK
- XT Jun 18, 2026
- XITK
- XT Twice a year
Distribution history
XITK vs XT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- XITK
- XT
Risk facts
- Volatility
- XITK 25.4%XT 16.5%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- XITK 0.63XT 1.08, better
- Worst fall
- XITK −61.4%XT −34.4%, better
- Market sensitivity
- XITK 1.67XT 1.35
XITK and XT in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.45% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.46% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.46% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.46% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

