TRFM ranks 3rd and XITK 4th of 30 funds in the Disruptive Innovation Category.
TRFM vs XITK
XITK −0.04pt a year
0.49%0.45%
TRFM 18.6×the volume
40.1K2.15K
TRFM vs XITK Performance
+5.8%+0.6%
- TRFM 0.49%
- XITK 0.45%, better
- TRFM $313M
- XITK $67M
- TRFM +5.8%, better
- XITK +0.6%
- TRFM
- XITK 0.00%
- TRFM 266
- XITK 95
- TRFM 40.1K sh, better
- XITK 2.15K sh
- TRFM $53.79
- XITK $197.42
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | TRFM | XITK |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A81 | A95Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B66Higher | D37 |
| Tradability | A70Higher | B65 |
| Holdings | A89Higher | A81 |
| Durability | C50 | A73Higher |
Rank among Disruptive Innovation funds
Same Category. TRFM and XITK are both graded against the same 30 Disruptive Innovation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
TRFMA
XITKA
In short
TRFM Most disruption funds buy the story. TRFM screens for companies actually writing R&D checks, then spreads the theme across a couple hundred US-listed names instead of a concentrated bet on thirty.
XITK Most innovation funds pick a theme and hope. XITK lets the data pick: FactSet ranks tech and electronic-media segments by growth, keeps the top quartile, then equal-weights roughly 100 names so no single giant runs the show.
Stated mandate
TRFM The Fund passively tracks the total return of the Pence Transformers Index before fees and expenses. The index targets U.S.-listed equity securities of companies positioned to benefit from significant changes in consumer behavior and technological innovation.
XITK The fund seeks to track the total return of the FactSet Innovative Technology Index before fees and expenses. Its mandate targets innovative technology-related companies with robust revenue growth and leading-edge products or services.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
TRFM vs XITK Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
TRFM vs XITK Cost
Overpaying TRFM vs XITK
$751
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
TRFM 0.49%
$9,792
XITK 0.45%
$9,041
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | TRFM | XITK | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $883 | $812 | $71 |
| 20 | $3,394 | $3,128 | $266 |
| 30 | $9,792 | $9,041 | $751 |
- 0.49%TRFM
- 0.45%XITK, cheaper
- Middle half of Disruptive Innovation funds
- Median 0.65%
XITK 2nd cheapest of 30 funds
TRFM 4th cheapest of 30 funds
TRFM vs XITK Dividends
- TRFM
- XITK 0.00%
- TRFM
- XITK None
- TRFM $0.08
- XITK
- TRFM Dec 31, 2025
- XITK
- TRFM Jan 5, 2026
- XITK
- TRFM Irregular
- XITK
Distribution history
TRFM vs XITK Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- TRFM 23.3%, betterXITK 25.4%
- Return per unit of risk
- TRFM 1.02, betterXITK 0.63
- Worst fall
- TRFM −28.4%XITK −61.4%
- Market sensitivity
- TRFM 1.64XITK 1.67
Popular comparisons
- 0.49% · 0.46%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.46%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.