Skip to content

FEBU vs PSMJ

AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Feb ETF

FEBUDCboe

Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF

PSMJBCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

PSMJ −0.25pt a year

FEBU0.74%PSMJ0.49%

Avg volume · 30D

PSMJ 1.1×the volume

FEBU5.34KPSMJ5.98K

FEBU vs PSMJ Performance

Nov 7, 2025 – Nov 9, 2026

+8.2%FEBU+8.5%PSMJ

Nov 7, 2025 to Nov 9, 2026. FEBU +8.2%. PSMJ +8.5%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−2.5%0%2.5%5%12.5%Nov 2025May 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
FEBU 0.74%
PSMJ 0.49%, better
Fund size
FEBU $45M
PSMJ $106M
1Y total return
FEBU +8.2%
PSMJ +8.5%, better
Yield (12M)
FEBU No data
PSMJ 0.00%
Holdings
FEBU 2
PSMJ 3
Avg volume (30D)
FEBU 5.34K sh
PSMJ 5.98K sh, better
NAV per share
FEBU $29.09
PSMJ $33.87
52W range

ETF.net Grade

FEBU: Cost 51, Risk 12, Mission not scored, Tradability 36, Holdings 54, Durability 34. PSMJ: Cost 70, Risk 53, Mission not scored, Tradability 48, Holdings not scored, Durability 64.
Pillar letters and Scores for FEBU, PSMJ, with each pillar’s weight
PillarFEBUPSMJ
Cost30% weightC51A70Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightF12C53Higher
Tradability15% weightD36C48Higher
Holdings10% weightC54Not scored
Durability5% weightD34B64Higher

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. FEBU and PSMJ are both graded against the same 51 S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 15%⁠

Category · 51 funds
See all 51 ›

PSMJ ranks 2nd and FEBU 45th of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 15% Category.

  1. Rank 1BPSMOPacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETFScore 63
  2. Rank 2BPSMJPacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETFScore 60
  3. Rank 3BPSMRPacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETFScore 57
  4. Rank 45DARLUAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Apr ETFScore 39
  5. Rank 45DFEBUAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Feb ETFScore 39
  6. Rank 45DNVBUAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Nov ETFScore 39

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

FEBUDAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Feb ETF

PSMJBPacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF

In short

FEBU No data

PSMJ Pacer's July-dated stop on the Swan SOS ladder: FLEX options on SPY that buffer the first 15% of a fall over a roughly one-year period, with upside capped in return. At 0.49%, it undercuts most of the buffer aisle.

Stated mandate

FEBU No data

PSMJ The Fund seeks to track the returns of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust up to a predetermined cap while providing a downside buffer over an approximately one-year period.

Why people hold it

FEBU No data

  • PSMJ Charges 0.49% a year against a 0.79% median for its buffered-SPY cohort, the same 0.79% Innovator's Power Buffer funds (PJUL, PJAN, POCT) charge for a similar job.
  • The deal is legible: FLEX options on SPY absorb the first 15% of a decline over the outcome period, and match the ETF's gains up to a cap struck each July.paceretfs.compaceretfs.com 2
  • Those FLEX options are customizable exchange-traded contracts settled through the Options Clearing Corporation, and Durango-based Swan Global Management sub-advises the strategy.paceretfs.com
  • One of four Moderate-series funds with staggered start months (PSMD, PSMR, PSMJ, PSMO), so a July reset can be stacked against other entry points rather than standing alone.paceretfs.com

Worth knowing

FEBU No data

  • PSMJ The 15% buffer and the cap belong to the full outcome period. Step in mid-period and you inherit whatever cap and buffer remain, not the starting terms.paceretfs.com
  • Thinly traded next to the largest buffer funds, so spreads and limit orders deserve more of your attention at the point of entry.
  • No regular income stream here: the options structure delivers its result through share price rather than distributions.paceretfs.com

Full FEBU profile⁠

Full PSMJ profile⁠

FEBU vs PSMJ Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

FEBU vs PSMJ Cost

Overpaying FEBU vs PSMJ

$4,515

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • FEBU 0.74%

    $14,307

  • PSMJ 0.49%

    $9,792

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • FEBU 0.74%
  • PSMJ 0.49%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530FEBU $14,307PSMJ $9,792

Year by year

YearFEBUPSMJOverpaying
10$1,319$883$436
20$5,015$3,394$1,621
30$14,307$9,792$4,515

Expense ratio

  • 0.74%FEBU
  • 0.49%PSMJ, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
  • Median 0.79%

PSMJ 5th cheapest of 51 funds

FEBU 18th cheapest of 51 funds

FEBU vs PSMJ Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 9, 2026
Yield (12M)
FEBU No data
PSMJ 0.00%
Payout (12M)
FEBU None
PSMJ None

Distribution history

Per share, 2021, same scale for both

FEBUAll FEBU payments⁠

No distribution history available.

PSMJ1 paymentAll PSMJ payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment in 2021. Dec 23, 2021 $0.0038. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.00252021

FEBU vs PSMJ Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
FEBU 8.8%since Mar 2025PSMJ 6.3%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
FEBU 0.77since Mar 2025PSMJ 1.47
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
FEBU −11.8%since Feb 2025PSMJ −10.9%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
FEBU 0.68PSMJ 0.47

Popular comparisons

  • FEBUDvsPSMOB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Feb ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSMJBvsPSMOB

    Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FEBUDvsPSMRB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Feb ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSMJBvsPSMRB

    Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FEBUDvsBUFCB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Feb ETF · AB Conservative Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSMJBvsBUFCB

    Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF · AB Conservative Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.