PSMO ranks 1st and FEBU 45th of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 15% Category.
FEBU vs PSMO
PSMO −0.25pt a year
0.74%0.49%
PSMO 1.5×the volume
5.34K8.14K
FEBU vs PSMO Performance
+8.2%+10.5%
- FEBU 0.74%
- PSMO 0.49%, better
- FEBU $45M
- PSMO $117M
- FEBU +8.2%
- PSMO +10.5%, better
- FEBU 2
- PSMO 3
- FEBU 5.34K sh
- PSMO 8.14K sh, better
- FEBU $29.09
- PSMO $32.98
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FEBU | PSMO |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C51 | A70Higher |
| Mission | A95 | |
| Risk | F12 | C47Higher |
| Tradability | D36 | B66Higher |
| Holdings | C54 | |
| Durability | D34 | B66Higher |
Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
Same Category. FEBU and PSMO are both graded against the same 51 S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FEBUD
PSMOB
In short
PSMO A 15% cushion against SPY's first losses, reset every October, for 0.49% a year. Most defined-outcome funds charge more, and the trade is a cap on the upside that gets set fresh at the start of each period.
Stated mandate
PSMO The fund seeks to track the returns of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust up to a stated cap while buffering the first 15% of losses during an approximately one-year outcome period.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FEBU vs PSMO Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FEBU vs PSMO Cost
Overpaying FEBU vs PSMO
$4,515
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FEBU 0.74%
$14,307
PSMO 0.49%
$9,792
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FEBU | PSMO | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,319 | $883 | $436 |
| 20 | $5,015 | $3,394 | $1,621 |
| 30 | $14,307 | $9,792 | $4,515 |
- 0.74%FEBU
- 0.49%PSMO, cheaper
- Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
- Median 0.79%
PSMO 5th cheapest of 51 funds
FEBU 18th cheapest of 51 funds
FEBU vs PSMO Dividends
- FEBU None
- PSMO None
Distribution history
FEBU vs PSMO Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FEBU 8.8%PSMO 5.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- FEBU 0.77PSMO 1.31
- Worst fall
- FEBU −11.8%PSMO −9.8%
- Market sensitivity
- FEBU 0.68PSMO 0.41
Popular comparisons
- 0.74% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.