FELG ranks 4th and FRTY 72nd of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.
FELG vs FRTY
FELG −0.42pt a year
0.18%0.60%
FELG 17.2×the volume
379K22K
FELG vs FRTY Performance
−0.5%−4.3%
- FELG 0.18%, better
- FRTY 0.60%
- FELG $5.78B
- FRTY $140M
- FELG −0.5%, better
- FRTY −4.3%
- FELG 0.37%, better
- FRTY 0.19%
- FELG 133
- FRTY 42
- FELG 379K sh, better
- FRTY 22K sh
- FELG $42.20
- FRTY $21.86
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FELG | FRTY |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A99Higher | D34 |
| Mission | A82 | |
| Risk | C51Higher | F21 |
| Tradability | A85Higher | D36 |
| Holdings | C52 | B66Higher |
| Durability | A95Higher | B61 |
Rank among US Active Growth funds
Same Category. FELG and FRTY are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FELGA
FRTYD
In short
FELG Active stock-picking on an index-fund budget. FELG charges 0.18% to tilt around the Russell 1000 Growth Index rather than copy it, running a strategy whose track record dates to 2007.
FRTY Alger's stock-picking house style in ETF form: roughly 40 mid-cap growth names, chosen for what the manager calls Positive Dynamic Change. In a peer group stacked with cheap large-cap index-huggers, it's the concentrated mid-cap outlier.
Stated mandate
FELG The fund seeks capital appreciation and normally invests at least 80% of its assets in common stocks included in the Russell 1000® Growth Index.
FRTY The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation by investing in a focused portfolio of mid-cap companies selected through fundamental research for promising growth potential. Its manager emphasizes companies experiencing Positive Dynamic Change.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FELG vs FRTY Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FELG vs FRTY Cost
Overpaying FRTY vs FELG
$8,068
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FELG 0.18%
$3,749
FRTY 0.60%
$11,817
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FELG | FRTY | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $328 | $1,076 | $748 |
| 20 | $1,281 | $4,116 | $2,835 |
| 30 | $3,749 | $11,817 | $8,068 |
- 0.18%FELG, cheaper
- 0.60%FRTY
- Middle half of US Active Growth funds
- Median 0.55%
FELG cheapest of 90 funds
FRTY 59th cheapest of 90 funds
FELG vs FRTY Dividends
- FELG 0.37%, better
- FRTY 0.19%
- FELG $0.16
- FRTY $0.04
- FELG $0.04
- FRTY $0.04
- FELG Sep 18, 2026
- FRTY Dec 18, 2025
- FELG Sep 22, 2026
- FRTY Dec 31, 2025
- FELG Quarterly
- FRTY Annual
Distribution history
FELG vs FRTY Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FELG 16.3%FRTY 23.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- FELG 0.93FRTY 0.84
- Worst fall
- FELG −23.9%FRTY −53.1%
- Market sensitivity
- FELG 1.23FRTY 1.41
FELG and FRTY in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.18% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
