JUSA ranks 1st and FRTY 72nd of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.
FRTY vs JUSA
JUSA −0.42pt a year
0.60%0.18%
JUSA 4.5×the volume
22K98.8K
FRTY vs JUSA Performance
−4.3%+10.8%
- FRTY 0.60%
- JUSA 0.18%, better
- FRTY $140M
- JUSA $745M
- FRTY −4.3%
- JUSA +10.8%, better
- FRTY 0.19%
- JUSA 0.72%, better
- FRTY 42
- JUSA 263
- FRTY 22K sh
- JUSA 98.8K sh, better
- FRTY $21.86
- JUSA $67.75
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FRTY | JUSA |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D34 | A99Higher |
| Mission | A84 | |
| Risk | F21 | A92Higher |
| Tradability | D36 | B58Higher |
| Holdings | B66 | A84Higher |
| Durability | B61 | A76Higher |
Rank among US Active Growth funds
Same Category. FRTY and JUSA are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FRTYD
JUSAA
In short
FRTY Alger's stock-picking house style in ETF form: roughly 40 mid-cap growth names, chosen for what the manager calls Positive Dynamic Change. In a peer group stacked with cheap large-cap index-huggers, it's the concentrated mid-cap outlier.
JUSA Active stock picking in index clothing: J.P. Morgan analysts tilt roughly 300 large caps while sector weights and risk stay close to the S&P 500, for 0.18% a year with no waiver attached.
Stated mandate
FRTY The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation by investing in a focused portfolio of mid-cap companies selected through fundamental research for promising growth potential. Its manager emphasizes companies experiencing Positive Dynamic Change.
JUSA The fund seeks capital appreciation through active, fundamental, bottom-up selection of large-cap U.S. equities. It targets companies with strong long-term earnings potential and attractive valuations relative to peers.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FRTY vs JUSA Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FRTY vs JUSA Cost
Overpaying FRTY vs JUSA
$8,068
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FRTY 0.60%
$11,817
JUSA 0.18%
$3,749
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FRTY | JUSA | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,076 | $328 | $748 |
| 20 | $4,116 | $1,281 | $2,835 |
| 30 | $11,817 | $3,749 | $8,068 |
- 0.60%FRTY
- 0.18%JUSA, cheaper
- Middle half of US Active Growth funds
- Median 0.55%
JUSA cheapest of 90 funds
FRTY 59th cheapest of 90 funds
FRTY vs JUSA Dividends
- FRTY 0.19%
- JUSA 0.72%, better
- FRTY $0.04
- JUSA $0.49
- FRTY $0.04
- JUSA $0.13
- FRTY Dec 18, 2025
- JUSA Sep 22, 2026
- FRTY Dec 31, 2025
- JUSA Sep 24, 2026
- FRTY Annual
- JUSA Quarterly
Distribution history
FRTY vs JUSA Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FRTY 23.6%JUSA 11.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- FRTY 0.84JUSA 1.41
- Worst fall
- FRTY −53.1%JUSA −14.0%
- Market sensitivity
- FRTY 1.41JUSA 0.98
FRTY and JUSA in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.60% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

