FELG ranks 4th and LGRO 18th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.
FELG vs LGRO
FELG −0.32pt a year
0.18%0.50%
FELG 47.8×the volume
364K7.61K
FELG vs LGRO Performance
−5.7%+8.8%
- FELG 0.18%, better
- LGRO 0.50%
- FELG $5.44B
- LGRO $136M
- FELG −5.7%
- LGRO +8.8%, better
- FELG 0.39%, better
- LGRO 0.34%
- FELG 137
- LGRO 49
- FELG 364K sh, better
- LGRO 7.61K sh
- FELG $39.56
- LGRO $44.73
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FELG | LGRO |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A99Higher | B62 |
| Mission | A82 | |
| Risk | C52 | B68Higher |
| Tradability | A85Higher | B64 |
| Holdings | C52 | B68Higher |
| Durability | A95Higher | B64 |
Rank among US Active Growth funds
Same Category. FELG and LGRO are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FELGA
LGROB
In short
FELG Active stock-picking on an index-fund budget. FELG charges 0.18% to tilt around the Russell 1000 Growth Index rather than copy it, running a strategy whose track record dates to 2007.
LGRO A boutique manager's concentrated take on large-cap growth: roughly 50 quality-and-growth names, actively chosen against the Bloomberg US 1000 Growth Index, at a fee that sits just under the typical active peer.
Stated mandate
FELG The fund seeks capital appreciation and normally invests at least 80% of its assets in common stocks included in the Russell 1000® Growth Index.
LGRO LGRO seeks maximum total return and above-peer-average risk-adjusted returns.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FELG vs LGRO Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FELG vs LGRO Cost
Overpaying LGRO vs FELG
$6,230
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FELG 0.18%
$3,749
LGRO 0.50%
$9,979
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FELG | LGRO | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $328 | $900 | $572 |
| 20 | $1,281 | $3,460 | $2,179 |
| 30 | $3,749 | $9,979 | $6,230 |
- 0.18%FELG, cheaper
- 0.50%LGRO
- Middle half of US Active Growth funds
- Median 0.55%
FELG cheapest of 90 funds
LGRO 33rd cheapest of 90 funds
FELG vs LGRO Dividends
- FELG 0.39%, better
- LGRO 0.34%
- FELG $0.16
- LGRO $0.15
- FELG $0.04
- LGRO $0.03
- FELG Sep 18, 2026
- LGRO Sep 17, 2026
- FELG Sep 22, 2026
- LGRO Sep 22, 2026
- FELG Quarterly
- LGRO Quarterly
Distribution history
FELG vs LGRO Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FELG 16.3%LGRO 16.3%Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Return per unit of risk
- FELG 0.93LGRO 1.21
- Worst fall
- FELG −23.9%LGRO −23.2%
- Market sensitivity
- FELG 1.23LGRO 1.24
FELG and LGRO in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.18% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.


